| [2020] FWCA 6314 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Independent Education Union of Australia – Queensland and Northern Territory Branch
(AG2020/3421)
ROSEWOOD & DISTRICT KINDERGARTEN AND PRESCHOOL EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION COLLECTIVE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2020
Educational services | |
COMMISSIONER YILMAZ | MELBOURNE, 24 NOVEMBER 2020 |
Application for approval of the Rosewood & District Kindergarten and Preschool Early Childhood Education Collective Enterprise Agreement 2020.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Rosewood & District Kindergarten and Preschool Early Childhood Education Collective Enterprise Agreement 2020 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made by the Independent Education Union of Australia – Queensland and Northern Territory Branch. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 are relevant to this application for approval and have been met.
[3] The Independent Education Union of Australia being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement is approved and in accordance with s.54, will operate from 1 December 2020. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2022.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE509616 PR724844>
- AGLC
- Independent Education Union of Australia – Queensland and Northern Territory Branch [2020] FWCA 6314
- Case
- [2020] FWCA 6314
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue the court had to resolve was whether the proposed enterprise agreement complied with the statutory requirements set out in the Fair Work Act 2009. This involved examining whether the agreement covered essential terms, was free from prohibited content, and had been fairly negotiated. The court also needed to determine if the application met the procedural prerequisites for approval, including whether it had been lodged within the specified time frame and whether the agreement had been certified as "not contentious" by the Fair Work Commission.
The court examined the application and the agreement in detail, ensuring that it adhered to the legislative framework. It found that the agreement met all the necessary criteria for approval, including the essential terms and the absence of prohibited content. The court also confirmed that the application was procedurally sound. Based on these findings, the court approved the collective enterprise agreement. The final orders of the court included the formal approval of the agreement, ensuring it would come into effect as per the terms specified within.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.