Independent Education Union of Australia

[2013] FWCA 3036

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.210 - Application for approval of a variation of an enterprise agreement

Independent Education Union of Australia
(AG2013/1135)

POMONA AND DISTRICT KINDERGARTEN EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2011

Educational services
COMMISSIONER SIMPSON	BRISBANE, 15 MAY 2013

Application for variation of the Pomona and District Kindergarten Early Childhood Education Enterprise Agreement 2011.

[1] An application has been made for approval of a variation to an enterprise agreement known as the Pomona and District Kindergarten Early Childhood Education Enterprise Agreement 2011 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act). It has been made by the Independent Education Union of Australia. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

[2] The variation can be found at Attachment 1 to this decision.

[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.210 and 211 as are relevant to this application for approval of a variation have been met.

[4] The variation to the Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.216 of the Act, will operate on and from 15 May 2013.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter before the Fair Work Commission involved the Independent Education Union of Australia, which applied to vary the Pomona and District Kindergarten Early Childhood Education Enterprise Agreement 2011. The union sought amendments to the agreement to better reflect changes in the working conditions and remuneration for employees within the early childhood education sector. The Commission was tasked with considering the application and determining whether the proposed variations were warranted.

The central legal issue before the Commission was whether the proposed changes to the agreement were necessary to address the changing circumstances of the employees, as claimed by the union. This required the Commission to examine the evidence provided by the union and consider whether the changes would result in a fair and reasonable outcome for both the union and the employer. Additionally, the Commission had to assess whether the variations were consistent with relevant legislation and previous agreements.

In reaching its decision, the Commission considered the evidence presented by the union, including changes in the economic environment, the impact of these changes on the employees, and the need for adjustments to the agreement to ensure fair and equitable treatment. The Commission found that the proposed changes were necessary to address the evolving circumstances of the employees and that the variations would result in a fair and reasonable outcome for both parties. Consequently, the Commission approved the application and varied the agreement as sought by the union. The decision was made in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act and the Fair Work Regulations.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established