| [2022] FWCA 3943 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Independent Education Union of Australia
(AG2022/4594)
Weipa Kindergarten & Preschool Early Childhood Education Collective Enterprise Agreement 2022
| Educational services | |
| COMMISSIONER SPENCER | BRISBANE, 9 NOVEMBER 2022 |
Application for approval of the Weipa Kindergarten & Preschool Early Childhood Education Collective Enterprise Agreement 2022
An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Weipa Kindergarten & Preschool Early Childhood Education Collective Enterprise Agreement 2022 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act) by the Independent Education Union of Australia – Queensland and Northern Territory Branch (the Applicant). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
The Applicant, being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) I note that the Agreement covers the Applicant.
The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 16 November 2022. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 December 2025.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE518125 PR747775>
- AGLC
- Independent Education Union of Australia [2022] FWCA 3943
- Case
- [2022] FWCA 3943
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue for the Commission to resolve was whether the proposed enterprise agreement met the requirements set forth in the Fair Work Act 2009. Specifically, the Commission needed to determine if the agreement complied with the procedural prerequisites for approval, such as the appropriate bargaining processes being followed and if the agreement contained all the mandated minimum terms and conditions. Additionally, the Commission had to assess if the agreement was in the best interests of the employees it covered.
In reaching its decision, the Commission considered the evidence presented regarding the bargaining process and the content of the proposed agreement. It examined whether the agreement was made in good faith, with genuine negotiations taking place between the employer and the union. The Commission also reviewed the terms of the agreement to ensure they met the minimum standards required by the Fair Work Act and that they were fair and reasonable in all respects. Ultimately, the Commission found that the application met all necessary legal criteria. The proposed agreement was approved, reflecting the Commission's determination that it was appropriately negotiated and contained all required terms, thereby serving the best interests of the employees.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.