Rafferty v Time 2000 West Pty Ltd (No 2)
[2008] FCA 1931
Citation 1
…im as an appointor of one of the relevant trusts. I will refer to this case further, below. [16] [2008] FCA 1931 39 Counsel for Mr Rafidi Snr suggested that, given the insolvency of both Mr Rafidi and the Brick and Block company, no purposes would be served by the making of an order. Thus, the Administrator’s Repo…
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Carey (No 6)
[2006] FCA 814
Citation 2
(Para 29)
…Described as such in the financial report of Brick and Block for the year ended 30 June 2009 [14] ASIC v Carey (No 6)(2006) 153 FCR 509 at [29] and [36]-[41] 37 Mr Rafidi has suggested that the reason for these transactions related to a “succession plan” formulated in 2004, although he also conceded that his “financ…
Cardile v LED Builders Pty Ltd
[1999] HCA 18
Citation 3
…to generally reflect the principles developed in the cases, including in the decision of the High Court in Cardile v LED Builders Pty Ltd[8]. [8] (1998) 198 CLR 380 27 In Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v AES Services (Aust) Pty Limited [9] Forrest J, citing Cardile , set out appropriate principles regarding applicat…
Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v AES Services (Aust) Pty Ltd
[2009] VSC 418
Citation 4
(Para 20)
…citing Cardile , set out appropriate principles regarding applications under Order 37A which principles include that the applicant establish: [9] [2009] VSC 418 at [20]; these principles had been also set out in His Honour’s previous decision of Zhen v Mo & Ors [2008] VSC 300 (a) an arguable case against the defe…
Zhen v Mo
[2008] VSC 300
Citation 5
…he applicant establish: [9] [2009] VSC 418 at [20]; these principles had been also set out in His Honour’s previous decision of Zhen v Mo & Ors [2008] VSC 300 (a) an arguable case against the defendant; and (b) that there is a danger the prospective judgment will be wholly or partly unsatisfied as a result of the…