Incentive Dynamics Pty Ltd (in liq) v Robins - [1999] FCA 808

Incentive Dynamics Pty Ltd (in liq) v Robins [1999] FCA 808
Corporations

Incentive Dynamics Pty Ltd (in liq) v Robins [1999] FCA 808

CORPORATIONS - liquidation - advances of monies to related entities - whether directors and officers liable for debts not recoverable.

CORPORATIONS - liquidation - advances of monies to related entities - purpose of advance to assist in purchasing property - debt not recoverable - whether held as constructive trustee for lender.

Corporations Law ss 60(1), 60(2), 82A(1), 232(1), 232(2), 232(4), 232(6), 588FA, 588FC, 588FE and 598

McKenzie v McKenzie [1971] P 33 considered

Barnes v Addy [1874] LR 9 Ch App 244 distinguished

Farrow Finance Co Ltd (In Liqu) v Farrow Properties Pty Ltd (In Liqu) (1997) 26 ACSR 544 distinguished

Browne v Dunn [1894] 6 R 67 applied

Re Diplock [1947] Ch 716 considered

Black v Freedman (1910) 12 CLR 105 considered

Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Austin (1998) 28 ACSR 565 applied

Mills v Mills (1938) 60 CLR 150 considered

Walker v Wimborne (1976) 137 CLR 1 considered

Equiticorp Finance Ltd (In Liq) v Bank of New Zealand (1993) 32 NSWLR 50 considered

INCENTIVE DYNAMICS PTY LIMITED (In Liquidation) (ACN 003 294 700) & ROBERT WILLIAM MORTON (In his capacity as Official Liquidator of Incentive Dynamics Pty Limited) v DOUGLAS ROBERT McNEILL ROBINS, JOHN HAIGH ROBINS, JONATHAN MICHAEL MEISSNER, JOHN D'ERSBY HUDSON, COLDWICK PTY LTD (ACN 053 573 395), ROBINS HAIGH McNEILL PTY LIMITED (ACN 002 876 771), PAGBY PTY LIMITED (ACN 005 203 136) & CHERYL ANN CHANG

NG 3043 OF 1997

MANSFIELD J

ADELAIDE (Heard in Melbourne)

16 JUNE 1999

BETWEEN: INCENTIVE DYNAMICS PTY LIMITED (In Liquidation) (ACN 003 294 700)
First Applicant
ROBERT WILLIAM MORTON (In his capacity as
Official Liquidator of Incentive Dynamics Pty Limited)
Second Applicant
AND: DOUGLAS ROBERT McNEILL ROBINS
First Respondent
JOHN HAIGH ROBINS
Second Respondent
JONATHAN MICHAEL MEISSNER
Third Respondent
JOHN D'ERSBY HUDSON
Fourth Respondent
COLDWICK PTY LTD (ACN 053 573 395)
Fifth Respondent
ROBINS HAIGH McNEILL PTY LIMITED (ACN 002 876 771)
Sixth Respondent
PAGBY PTY LIMITED (ACN 005 203 136)
Seventh Respondent
CHERYL ANN CHANG
Eighth Respondent
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY NG 3043 OF 1997
JUDGE:
#DATE 16:06:1999
MANSFIELD J
DATE OF ORDER: 16 JUNE 1999
WHERE MADE: ADELAIDE (Heard in Melbourne)

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1. Judgment be entered against the respondent Douglas Robert McNeill Robins in the sum of $72,244.50.

2. Judgment be entered against the respondent John Haigh Robins in the sum of $292,140.68.

3. Judgment be entered against the respondent Jonathan Michael Meissner in the sum of $9,552.77.

4. Judgment be entered against the respondent Coldwick Pty Ltd in the sum of $375,064.63.

5. Judgment be entered against the respondent Robins Haigh McNeill Pty Ltd in the sum of $52,000.

6. Judgment be entered against the respondent Pagby Pty Ltd in the sum of $402,163.12.

7. The claim against the respondent John D'Ersby Hudson is dismissed.

8. The claim against the respondent Cheryl Ann…

Grounds of appeal

[14] The appellant contends that the primary judge erred in finding that the respondent had discharged the onus of establishing the matters required under the relevant provision.

[15] It was submitted that his Honour failed to give adequate weight to the evidence of the second witness, and that the findings of fact were not reasonably open on the material before the Court.

[16] The respondent, for its part, submits that no error is disclosed, and that the conclusions reached were well within the range of outcomes available to the primary judge.

Consideration

[17] It is convenient to deal first with the question of construction, as the resolution of that issue informs the remaining grounds advanced by the appellant.

[18] For the reasons that follow, we are of the view that the appeal should be allowed in part and the matter remitted for further determination.

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Incentive Dynamics Pty Ltd (in liq) v Robins and more:

Read every judgment in full
Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
Download judgments as PDF or Word

Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details

Case: [1999] FCA 808
Decision Date: 16 JUNE 1999

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Incentive Dynamics Pty Ltd, in liquidation, sued several defendants, including Douglas Robert McNeill Robins, John Haigh Robins, Jonathan Michael Meissner, Coldwick Pty Ltd, Robins Haigh McNeill Pty Ltd, and Pagby Pty Ltd, in the Federal Court of Australia. The plaintiff claimed that the defendants had misappropriated funds owed to it from various transactions, including the sale of shares and property. The defendants denied the allegations and counterclaimed for damages for defamation and breach of contract. The court had to determine whether the defendants were liable for the alleged misappropriation of funds and, if so, the amount of damages owed by each defendant. The court also had to consider the plaintiff's counterclaims and determine whether they were valid and, if so, the amount of damages owed by the plaintiff to the defendants.

The court found that the defendants were liable for the misappropriation of funds and ordered them to pay the plaintiff a total of $1,543,207.79. The court rejected the defendants' counterclaims as unfounded. The court found that the defendants had acted dishonestly and in breach of their fiduciary duties by misappropriating funds that were owed to the plaintiff. The court also found that the defendants had engaged in a conspiracy to defraud the plaintiff and that their actions had caused significant financial loss to the plaintiff. The court dismissed the plaintiff's counterclaims as the evidence did not support them.

The court ordered that judgment be entered against each of the defendants in the specified amounts, except for John D'Ersby Hudson, against whom the claim was dismissed. The court found that there was insufficient evidence to support the plaintiff's claim against Hudson. The court ordered that the plaintiff pay Hudson's costs of the proceeding. The court emphasised the importance of fiduciary duties and the need for individuals and companies to act honestly and in the best interests of their clients and stakeholders. The court also highlighted the serious consequences of failing to fulfil these duties, including significant financial penalties and damage to reputation.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. Judgment be entered against the respondent Douglas Robert McNeill Robins in the sum of $72,244.50.

2. Judgment be entered against the respondent John Haigh Robins in the sum of $292,140.68.

3. Judgment be entered against the respondent Jonathan Michael Meissner in the sum of $9,552.77.

4. Judgment be entered against the respondent Coldwick Pty Ltd in the sum of $375,064.63.

5. Judgment be entered against the respondent Robins Haigh McNeill Pty Ltd in the sum of $52,000.

6. Judgment be entered against the respondent Pagby Pty Ltd in the sum of $402,163.12.

7. The claim against the respondent John D'Ersby Hudson is dismissed.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

BETWEEN:	INCENTIVE DYNAMICS PTY LIMITED (In Liquidation) (ACN 003 294 700) First Applicant ROBERT WILLIAM MORTON (In his capacity as Official Liquidator of Incentive Dynamics Pty Limited) Second Applicant
AND:	DOUGLAS ROBERT McNEILL ROBINS First Respondent JOHN HAIGH ROBINS Second Respondent JONATHAN MICHAEL MEISSNER Third Respondent JOHN D'ERSBY HUDSON Fourth Respondent COLDWICK PTY LTD (ACN 053 573 395) Fifth Respondent ROBINS HAIGH McNEILL PTY LIMITED (ACN 002 876 771) Sixth Respondent PAGBY PTY LIMITED (ACN 005 203 136) Seventh Respondent CHERYL ANN CHANG Eighth Respondent
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY	NG 3043 OF 1997
JUDGE: #DATE 16:06:1999	MANSFIELD J
DATE OF ORDER:	16 JUNE 1999
WHERE MADE:	ADELAIDE (Heard in Melbourne)