Inca Office Supplies Pty Ltd v Nashua Australia Pty Ltd

[1978] FCA 106

-L-

A d d i t l o n a l l y , Ipca scsks orders r c s t r a i n i n y Xas?~;a frc.11

d i s t r i h t i n g o r c l r c u l a C l n g t o a n y p e r s o n z n y 1 : r l t t fn d o ~ ~ ~ w :

c o n t a i n i n g c e r t a l n of t h s s'iatcIrc:!:lts occurring wl t 'n ln the

above t r x t a n 2 c e r t a i n o t k r orclcl-S.

-3 -

or d e c c l v e i n c o n t r c l v e r L t l o n of s . 5 2 of t h c Tradc P r 3 r t i c ~ s

-	A c t 1974 and seeks a n ~ n ~ u n c t i o n p u r s a n t	tr7	s . G O	of t h a t
A c t .

-4-

agreement 1 s rnlsleadinc; 1n t h a t lt does not accura te ly s ta te

t h e e f f e c t of t h a t agreement.

. . /5

-5-

-G-

r cp roduc t ion & t h c b l a c k r e c t a n g l e s . On many c o p l c s tile

r ep roduc t lon of b lue and yellow on machlne C was s u p e r l o r

t o machine A but towards thc end of t h e r u n n a c h l n s A IS

markedly supe:-lor I n the rc -xoduc t lon of tl-n b l a c k p r l n t l n g

or typed script. I have rcachcd thc gen+r.d conclusicn t h a t

t h e Nashua to: ler In the reproduct lon of anlitl-ing black 1s

s u p e r l o r t o t h a r : of I n c a . S u c h c r c e p t l o r s a s o c c u r t o thls

g e n e r a l s t a t e m e n t a r e a f a l r l y small perccntacrr? of t h e t o t a l .

T h i s s n p c r l o r l t y c m l d no‘- L descr.,b?d as mar’;ed bL!r is

n c v e r t h e l c s s	noticeable	on	a	v i sua l co rqpa r i son In	lmn-y
c a s e s .
. ./ I

-8-

or whlch otherwlsc cause dzmage o r d e t e r l o r a t l s n t o t h e

copier arc used in 3 t" . Thcre 1 s no evidence that Inca

t o n e r f a l l s v1thl.n th l s de7cr lp t lon OC tlle matcrlals.

I n f a c t there 1s cv;dcnce irom pcople expzrt i n thc use

of the rnachlner, t h a t no da;vac;e 1 s czusec? and therefore

the segnert r e l a t l n q t o t h e malntenance agreen;cnt 1 s

rnisleadlng.

d l s t r i b u t i n g o r c i r c u l z t l n g t o any persop any writtcn

document or maklng any o r a l s ta tencnt t o azy persr~n I!-:

the f ol loxing terns : -

-9-

fo l lowing r easons :

- Whilst l n l t l s l d c n s l t y of ccpy 1s e q u a l t o I:ashua,

t h e t o n c r loscs d e n s i t y shdxply wlth c o n s t a n t

use and w i t h l n EO0 c o p l c s t h e mmqc 113s faded

apprec lab ly .

- The t o n e r shovs recovery overnrcJht o r equlvcll.ent

tlme of non use ho::sver a f t e r a n o t h e r 200 ccnries

t h e d e n s i t y i s aqa in unaccep tab le .

I t must a l s o b2 n o t e d t i m t before a Maintenance Aqz-w=nc

cou ld be r c - ) . n s t a t e d t h e coplcr- would nccd t o bf

inspec ted and If thought f l t g l v c n a P r c v c n t a t l v c

Maintenance Scrvlce. Thls call woulcl bz cha rgeab le

a t o u r c u r r e n t rates.

or any c locurent or s t s te r ren t sLstll;g m a t c r l a l t o a

2,1171 3 2: y f C r c t : .

. . /l0

-10-

(b) d i s t r i b u t l n g or c l r c u l a t l n g t o a n y p c r s o n a n y 1 : r l t t e n

docuncnt s ta t3ng: -

( c ) D l s t r i b J t l n y or c i r c u l a t l n g t o a:>y p e r s o n z n y w - l t t c n

documcn t s t a t i . ng tha t t hc applicant's t o n e r s n u d g c s q " x e

noklccably 1:hcn	rubb2d on	comparison wzth the rcsponckrlt	' S
toner.

-1i-