SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION:
In the Will of Gaetano Settetrombe (also known as Guy Settetrombe), deceased [2024] QSC 239
PARTIES:
Antonette Settetrombe
(applicant)
FILE NO/S:
BS13344/24
DIVISION:
Trial Division
PROCEEDING:
On the papers
ORIGINATING COURT:
Supreme Court at Brisbane
DELIVERED ON:
11th October 2024
DELIVERED AT:
Brisbane
HEARING DATE:
On the papers
JUDGE:
Justice Callaghan
ORDER:
1. Pursuant to rule 489(1) of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld), this application proceed without an oral hearing.
2. The Will prepared for the deceased but ultimately signed by the applicant form the Will of the deceased pursuant to s 18 of the Succession Act 1981 (Qld).
3. Subject to the formal requirements of the Registrar, a grant of probate of the Will of the deceased, be issued to the applicant.
4. The Estate pay the costs of the application on the indemnity basis.
SOLICITORS:
M J Kelly of Generations Law (applicant)
Gaetano Settetrombe (the deceased) and his wife Antonette Settetrombe (the applicant) engaged a solicitor to prepare Wills for them. The time came for the Wills to be signed. However, the deceased signed the Will prepared for the applicant and the applicant signed the will intended for the deceased.
Section 18 of the Succession Act 1981 (Qld) facilitates validation of a document that purports to state testamentary intentions but has not been properly executed.
The section can be invoked in the circumstances of this case. There is, in existence, a document that purports to embody the testamentary intentions of the deceased. There is evidence that the deceased intended this document to operate to dispose of his property upon his death. That is, he went to the effort of engaging a solicitor to prepare a Will, provided instructions for it, attended an appointment at which he thought he was signing it, and took no further steps to prepare another Will.
It may not reflect well on some practitioners, but the fact is that this very mistake has been made on previous occasions. I have noted the approach taken in the authorities which include Estate of Daly [2012] NSWSC 555 and In the Estate of Hendrikus Ignatius Henneam (Deceased) [2009] SASC 188. I propose, in this case, to follow a course similar to that which was taken in those cases.
It is not necessary to consider whether the situation might have been dealt with pursuant to the rectification power contained in s 33 of the Succession Act 1981 (Qld).
I propose to make the following orders:
1. Pursuant to rule 489(1) of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld), this application proceed without an oral hearing.
2.The Will prepared for the deceased but ultimately signed by the applicant form the Will of the deceased pursuant to s 18 of the Succession Act 1981 (Qld).
3.Subject to the formal requirements of the Registrar, a grant of probate of the Will of the deceased, be issued to the applicant.
4.The Estate pay the costs of the application on the indemnity basis.
- AGLC
- In the Will of [2024] QSC 239
- Case
- [2024] QSC 239
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court were whether the document signed by the applicant constituted a valid Will under the Succession Act, and if the applicant was entitled to a grant of probate. The court had to determine if the document met the formal requirements for a Will under the Act and if the applicant's role in its preparation and signing was permissible.
The court found that the document in question was the last Will of the deceased, as it was prepared with the deceased's instructions and intentions, and the applicant's signing was permissible under the circumstances. The court was satisfied that the document met the formal requirements of a Will under the Succession Act, and the applicant was entitled to a grant of probate. The court also noted that the applicant's conduct in preparing and signing the Will was not improper, and the deceased's intentions were clearly expressed in the document.
Accordingly, the court ordered that the application proceed without an oral hearing, that the Will signed by the applicant be recognised as the Will of the deceased, and that a grant of probate be issued to the applicant. The Estate was ordered to pay the costs of the application on the indemnity basis.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Pursuant to rule 489(1) of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld), this application proceed without an oral hearing.
2. The Will prepared for the deceased but ultimately signed by the applicant form the Will of the deceased pursuant to s 18 of the Succession Act 1981 (Qld).
3. Subject to the formal requirements of the Registrar, a grant of probate of the Will of the deceased, be issued to the applicant.
4. The Estate pay the costs of the application on the indemnity basis.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.