In the Will of

Link copied
Case Copied 7 min read

SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION:

In the Will of Valerie Eve Robson (deceased) [2020] QSC 52

PARTIES:

ANN SMITH AND LOREI SUZANNE THOMPSON

(Applicants)

FILE NO/S:

BS 2285 of 2020

DIVISION:

Civil

PROCEEDING:

Application on the papers

ORIGINATING COURT:

Supreme Court

DELIVERED ON:

25 March 2020

DELIVERED AT:

Brisbane

HEARING DATE:

On the papers

JUDGE:

Brown J

ORDER:

1. Pursuant to r 489(1) of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld) this application proceed without an oral hearing.

2. Pursuant to r 7 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld) the time for filing and hearing this application be abridged.

3.   Subject to the formal requirements of the Registrar, the photocopy of the Will of VALERIE EVE ROBSON, Unit 1, 33 Jarnahill Drive, Mount Coolum in the State of Queensland that is Exhibit A to joint Affidavit Supporting Probate Application of Ann Smith and Lorei Suzanne Thompson affirmed 26 February 2020 be admitted to probate until the Original Will or more authenticated evidence be brought into and left in the Registry.

4.   The Estate pay the costs of the Application.

CATCHWORDS:

SUCCESSION – WILLS, PROBATE AND ADMINISTRATION – MAKING OF A WILL – TESTAMENTARY INSTRUMENTS – WHEN LOST, MISLAID, DESTROYED OR NOT AVAILABLE – where a copy of the original will was executed and provided to a named executor – where the original will was misplaced and never located – where the only evidence of the will is the copy provided to the executor – whether the copy of the original will should be admitted to probate

Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld), rr 7, 489 & 598
Cahill v Rhode [2002] NSWSC 561, considered
Frizo v Frizo [2011] QSC 107, followed

SOLICITORS:

Sunshine Coast Legal Pty Ltd for the Applicants

  1. This is an application on the papers seeking an order of the Court that the photocopied Will of Valerie Eve Robson (the Deceased), dated 20 December 2004, be admitted to probate. 

  2. The Deceased died on 29 August 2019.  She was diagnosed with Alzheimer’s on 10 December 2012.  The photocopy of the Will is dated 20 December 2004.  The photocopy of the Will in question shows that the Will has been duly executed on 20 December 2004 and witnessed.  The Will states that it was prepared by Noel Woodall & Associates Lawyers. 

  3. A copy of the Will was sent via post to Ann Smith, the deceased’s stepsister.[1]  Ms Smith has deposed that the Deceased had told her in advance that she would be an executor of the Will and that the Deceased would send her a copy of the Will.  Ms Smith has verified that the handwritten comments on the Will, namely “Annie – Copy of my will. Any questions – just ask Val” and “Original with” above the words “Noel Woodall & Associates” are, from her knowledge of the Deceased’s handwriting, in the Deceased’s handwriting.  Ms Smith maintained a copy of the Will until the death of the Deceased.

    [1]See affidavit of Ann Smith filed 2…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read In the Will of and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2020] QSC 52
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case pertains to the estate of Valerie Eve Robson, who resided at Unit 1, 33 Jarnahill Drive, Mount Coolum, Queensland. The dispute revolves around the validity of a photocopy of her will, as the original document has been lost or misplaced. The application was heard by the Supreme Court of Queensland, which was tasked with deciding whether the copy of the will could be admitted to probate in the absence of the original.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the copy of the will, provided to one of the named executors, could be admitted to probate in lieu of the original will, which could not be located. The court had to determine whether the copy met the legal standards for testamentary instruments and whether it sufficiently represented the deceased's intentions.

In addressing the legal issues, the court noted that the copy of the will was provided to one of the named executors and was accompanied by an affidavit affirming its accuracy. The court emphasised the importance of ensuring the deceased's testamentary wishes are upheld, even when the original document is not available. It held that the copy was admissible to probate on the basis that it was the best evidence available of the deceased's will, and that no other authenticated evidence was presented. The court concluded that the copy should be admitted to probate, pending the production of the original will or more authenticated evidence.

The court's orders included proceeding with the application without an oral hearing and abridging the time for filing and hearing the application. The court granted the application to admit the copy of the will to probate, subject to the formal requirements of the Registrar. Additionally, the estate was ordered to pay the costs of the application.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. Pursuant to r 489(1) of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld) this application proceed without an oral hearing.

2. Pursuant to r 7 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld) the time for filing and hearing this application be abridged.

3. Subject to the formal requirements of the Registrar, the photocopy of the Will of VALERIE EVE ROBSON, Unit 1, 33 Jarnahill Drive, Mount Coolum in the State of Queensland that is Exhibit A to joint Affidavit Supporting Probate Application of Ann Smith and Lorei Suzanne Thompson affirmed 26 February 2020 be admitted to probate until the Original Will or more authenticated evidence be brought into and left in the Registry.

4. The Estate pay the costs of the Application.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.