In the matter of the Federated Clerks Union of Australia In the matter of an application for Jack Lawler Rayner for an inquiry into elections in the Federated Clerks Union of Australia, Victorian Branch

Case

[1983] FCA 100

24 May 1983

No judgment structure available for this case.

\TICTORT\ DISTRTCT FFGTSTRY

I

V.

Fro.

?7 of l Q n 7

IMDUSTRTAT, DTVTSTON

J N THE

V A T T ~ R oi

the

r c d r r a t e d

C l e r k s

I J n j o n

of

A u s t r a l i a ,

a n

o r q a n j m t 1 0 n of

cmploypes

unde r

t h e

Conc j 1 i s t i o n

a

d

A r b i f r a t i o n A c t of

1004

a n d

J Y THE MATTER o f a n a n p l i c a t l o n

by ;rack J,awler Ravncr for a n

-

-

i n q u i r y

i n t o

e l e c t - i o n s

i n

the

F e d e r a t e d

C l e r k s

U n i o n

of

Rustral la ,

V i c t o r i a n B r a n c h

CORAY:

MorChrop J.

'I'BE COURT

DFCLARES

THAT t hc

= l ec t . l ons

he12

i n

lop2

t o

1.bc

o f f i c e s

0'

a n n u a l

s t a t e

c o n f r r e n c e

de !eqa te

2 n d

s t a t e

counc i 11 or

t o t h e Victorian

Branch of

t h e

F r i c r r a t e r l

C l e r k s

Union

of

q u s t r a l i a

f r o m

the

s h i p p i n q section

of t.hat

P r a n c h

sre

i lecl .~re.cl

vo id .

T N THE FEDERAL C01117T O F ADSTR3LTA

\

)

VICTORJA

D STRTCT

REG S RY

\ \

TNDUSTRTAL

DTVISTOM

'CM TAF Y%?TI-,R

of t h e Federated

C l e r k s

Union

of

A u s t r a l i a ,

a n

o r q a n i z a t i o n

of

employees

u n d e r

t h e

C o n c i l i a t i o n

a n d

A r b i t r a t i o n A c t o f

1Qn4

and

I N THE

MATTER

of

a n a p p l i c a t l o n

by Jack Lawler Rayner for a n

i n q u i r y i n t o e l e c t i o n s i n t h r

F e d e r a t e d

C l e r k s

U n i o n

o f

A u s t r a l i a ,

V i c t o r l a n Branch

C O R W :

N o r t h r o p

J .

DATE :

30 M A Y

14R3

-

WHERE MADE:

Melbourne

The

C o u r t

i s

i n q u x r i n g i n t o

the

q u e s t i n n of

wl7ptht-r

a n i r r e g u l a r i t y o c c u r r e d i n

or

i n c o n n e c t i o n

w l t h

an

c1ec:

t

lon

for

the

off ices- of

s t a t e

c o n f e r e n c e

d e l c o a t e

a n d

s t a t e

c o u n c ~ l

o r respec t ive ly

u n d e r

the

r u l e s

of

t h e

Fe r l e ra t ed

C l c r k s

Union'

of

q u s t r a l i a ,

V i c t o r i a n

R r a n c h ,

" the

Branch" :

see

s . 1 6 5

of

the

Conc i l l a t . i on

and

P rh l t - r a i - ion

Act

l O O d ,

" the

A c t " .

J a c k

L a w l e r

R a y n e r ,

t h e

a p p l i c a n t ,

had

I o i J o ~ d a n

a p p l i c a t i o n

For

a n

i n q u l r y

with

t he

T n d u s t r i a l

Req? s t ra r :

s .15C1~1' , - n d

(9) o f

i.!.r- h-+.

T?-P

Tnd11-tr i71

"eo1 $1 r a j -

- 2 -

r e f e r r c d

t h e

m a t t e r

t o

t h e

C o u r t

unde r

s.lfir) of

t h e

Act.

Thereupor! .che

i n q u i r y was

i n s t i t u t e d

I n t h e

C o u r t :

5.161

o f

t h e

A c t :

s e e

a1 so

S . ] 1 R A ( 1 I

of

the

Ac

t

and

S. 1 cl

Federal

Cour t

of

A u s t r a l i a

A c t 1976.

A t t h e

i n q u i r y

counsel appepred

o n b e h a l f

of

t h e a p p l i c a n t a n d o n e c o n n s e l a p p e a r e d o n h e h a l f

o f Mr.

J.

D.

Cameron

( t h e

s e c r e t a r y

of

t h e

B r a n c h ) ,

Mr.

R .

Brown and

Mr.

K. Cook ( h e i n g

p e r s o n s

who

nominated

€or

t h e

o f f i c e s t h e r e t u r n i n g o f f i c e r c o n d u c t j n q % h e c l e c t i o n ) , a n d

s u b j e c t

OF

t h e

i n q u i r y ) ,

Mr.

T.

I!.

Ryan

( t h e

t h e F a d e r a t c ?

Clerks Union h e r e 1 n a f t e r r e f e r r e d

of

A u s t r a l i a ,

" t h e

F r d p r a t - i o n " ,

a l l

o f

whom

a r e

t o a5

" t h e r e s p o n d e n t s " .

A t

a n e a r l y s t a q e o f t h e i n q u i r y i t .

hecame

a p p a r e n t

t h a t t h e r e s p e c t i v e l y t h e o f f i c e s o f

e l e c t i o n

was

f o r

o f f i c e s

i n

t h e

F r a n c h

h e i n q

n

s t a t e c o n f e r e n c ? d e l e a a t e

u n d r r

B r a n c h

r u l e

1 3 and

a

s t a t e councillor

u n d e r

R r a n c h

r u l e

l?,

S-

J

i n e a c h s e c t i o n . o f

c a s e

t1.e

e l e c t i o n

h e i n q

hy mrmherp

of

t h e

s h i p p l n a

t h e

B r a n c h .

Thc

r u l e s

o f

t h e

F e d e r a t l o n ,

" t h e

F e d e r a l

rules",

a n d

t h e

r u l e s

of

t h e

E r a n c h ,

"thr

Branch

r u l e s " ,

a r c

r e q i s t e r e d

u n d e r

t h e

p r o v i s i o n s

of

t h e

A c t .

The

B r a n c h

h a s

p u r p o r t e ?

t.o

have

made

rules

a p p l

i c a b l e

t o

t h e

s \ i p p i . n q

s e c t i o n

o f

t F r

R r z n c h ,

h u t

t h o s e

r u l r s

a r e

n o t

r e q i s t e r c d

u n d e r

t h e

p r o v i s j o n s

of t h e A c t .

71- became c l e a r ,

t ~ e r e f o r c ,

t h a t

t h e e l . e c t l o n

was

fo r n f f l c e s

provirl-8

f o r

i n

t h e

E r a n c h

r u l e s ,

h e i n q

o f f ~ c e s

which ,

unr l r r

the

Act

ln.1

t1.c

- ? -

R e n u l a t i o n s ,

were

r e q u i r e d

t o be

f i l l e d

b

y

a n

e l r c t i o n ,

h u t

t h a t

h e

e l e c t i o n

h a d

b e e n

c 0 n d 1 1 c t e . l

u n d r r

rules

which

had

n o t been

r e q i s t e r e d .

T h e

i n q u i r y

o r i q i n f i l l y

s o u q h t

by

th'e

applicant

a n d

r e f e r r e d

t o t h e

C o u r t

hy

t h e

T n c l l l s t r i a l

R e q i s t r a r

r e l a t e d

t o

a t h i . r d s e c t j o n .

p o s i t l o n ,

n a m e l y

t h a t

of

' s e c r e t a r y

of

t h e

s h i p p l n q

That

was

a

p o s i t i o n

n o t

p r o v i d e d

€or

i n

a n y

r e g i s t e r e d r u l e of

the

F e d e r a t i o n o r

o f

t h e

B r a n c h .

It.

was

a

p o s i t i o n

p r o v i d e d

f o r

by

t h e

u n r e s i s t e r c d

s h i p p i n g

s e c t i o n

r u l e s

and

was

c o n d u c t e d p u r s u a n t

t o

t h o s e a n r e q i s t e r e d r u l e s .

'

On

a

p r e l i m i n a r y o b j e c t i o n

t h e C o u r t , c o n s t i t u t e d

by

S m j t h c r s

J . ,

on

l6

Nove~nher l o p ? made

a n

orrler

i i e c l a r l n q

t h a t

t h e

C o u r t

h a d

n

o

~ u r i s d i c t i o n

t o

entertain

t h e

reference

of

t h e

J n r J u s t r i a l

R e g i s t r a r

i n s o f a r

as

i t

i n v o l v e d

a n

i n q u i r y

i n t o

the

e l e c t i o n

fo r

t h e

~ o s i t i o n of

s e c r e t a r y

of

t h e

s b i p p i n q

sectlglf:

A f t e r

t h e

m a t t e r

h a d

b e e n

onerlcri

h u t

herore

a n y

e v i d c n c e .

a p a r t

from

t h e

a f f j d a v i t s ,

h a i l

h e e n

q i v c = n ,

counspl

f o r

t h e

r e s p o n d e n t s

s u h m l t t e d

t h a t

t h r

C o u r t

h a d

n o

~ u r j s d i c t ~ o n

t o

e n t c r t a l n

t h P

r e f r r ence

i n s o f a r a s

i t .

r e l a t e d

t o t h e s u h r n i s s i o n w a s

t w o

o f f i ces

a1 r e a d y

d e s c r i b e d .

Tn

s u b s t a n c e ,

h1s

t h a t

1 n

S . ] ??(l\

and

S . 16511 )

of

t h e Act,

t h e

word

" e l p c t i o n "

should

be

c o n s t r u e d

a s meaning

" a n

e l e c t i o n

-

A

-

which

w a s

h e i n a

or

h a d b e e n ~ o n r l u c t e d p u r s u a n t

t o

r u l e s v l h i c h

h a d

b e e n

r e g i s t e r e d " .

The

r e l e v a n t

p a r t s

of

t h o s e

s c r ? t i o n s

a re

s e t o u t :

"159.11.)

Where

a

mrmher

of

;In

o r g a n i z a t i o n

.

. .

c l a i m s t h a t t h e r e h a s b e e n a n

irregularity

i n o r

i n

c o n n e x i o n

w i t h

a n

e l e c t l o n

for

a n

o f f i c e

i n

t h e

o r g a n i z a t i o n ,

or

i n a

b r a n c h

of

t h e

o r g a n i z a t j o n ,

h

e

p a y

l o d g e

a

n

a p p l j c a t l o n

for

an incru j ry

. .

. I '

and

1 6 5 . ( 1 1

F t a n

i n q u i r y

the

C o u r t

s h a l l .

i n q u i r e

i n t o

a n ?

d e t e r m i n e

t h e

q u e s t ~ o n

w h e t h e r

a n y

i r r e q u l a r i

t y h a s o c c u r r e d

i n

o r

i n

c o n n e v j o n

w i t h t h e e l e c t ~ o n .. ."

C o u n s e l

c o n t e n d e d

t h a t

e l e c t l o n

n

c o n d u c t e d

p u r s u a n i -

t o

u n r e q i s t e r e c l

r u l e s

j s

a

n u l l i t y and

t h u s i s n o t

a n

e l ec t lon

f o r t h e c o n t e n t ' i o n

p u r p o s e s

of

t h o s e

p r o v i s i o n s .

Tn

s u n n o r t

of

t h a t

c

c o u n s e l

re1 ied

u p o n

v j e w s

e r p r e s s e d

I n

S m j t h

V .

T a y l o r

( 1 4 6 4 )

6 F.L .R .

13R and

thc cases r e f e r r e d t o the re rn .

A l l . t h o s e

c a s e s

a r o s e

u n d e r

w h a t

i s

now

s .141

of

t h e

Act.

C o u n s e l

c o n t e n d e d

t h a t

where

s u c h

a n

e l ec t lon

t a k e s

p l ~ c c

there

can

he

n o e l e c t i o n

on

which

t o

f o u n d t h e i n q u j r y a n d h e

r e f e r r e d by

way

of

example t o t h e

r e a s o n c :

fo r

d c c l s i o n q l v r n

b y

the

T n d u s t r i a l

R q i s t r a r ,

M r .

R .

> l a r s h a l l ,

i n

Tn

r e V . O . A .

(1071) 2 6 11R 3245.

That

WAS

a

c a s e where

t h e o f c i c e

in.

q u e s t i o n

was

c r e a t e d h y u n r e n i s t - e r e d

r u l e s

and

t h e h o l d e r

o f

t h s t

o f f i c e

h a d

n o

p o w e r s

c o n f c r r e d

u n o n

h i m

hy

a n y

r - u i s t - r e d

r l l l e s .

Th-

san'? m r l r c i r , 1 = s

For-1-a

< h - b a s l q

cr

- 5 -

t h e

d e c i s i o n

of

S m i t h e r s J . ,

s u p r a .

I n

t h e

p r e s e n t

c a s e ,

t h r

t w o

o f f i c e s ,

t h e

suhiect of

the i n q u i r y ,

a r e

c r e a t e d

l y t h P

B r a n c h

r u l e s

t d i i c h

a r e

registered,

and

t h e

h o l d e r s

o

f

t h o - e

o f f i ces

h a v e

power

confe r r ed upon

them

by t h e Rrancfi r u l ~ s .

C o u n s e l c o n t e n d e d f u r t h e r t h a t

a

reference

t o o t h e r

p r o v i s i o n s

i n

P a r t

1 X

s u p p o r t e d

a b s e n c e

of

j u r i s d i c t i o n .

H e

r e f e r r e d

t o

t h e

d e f i n i t i o n

of

t h e

w o r d

" i r r e g u l a r i t y "

c o n t a i n e d

I n

s . 4

of

t h e

A c t

a n 4

i t s

ex tended

mean inq

to

i n c l u d e

"a

bresch

o€ t h e

r u l . e s

oi

a n o r q a n l z a t i o n " w h i c h ,

he

c o n t e n d e d ,

m u s t

mean

r e o i s t e r e d

r u l e s .

T h e r e

i s

f o r c e

i n

t h a t c o n t e n t l o n b u t

It

does

n o t c o n c l u d e

the matter

s i n c e t h e

d e f i n i t i o n

i s

n o t

d e f i n i t i v e

of

t h e

m e a n i n q

of

t he

word

" i r r e g u l a r i t y " .

I

r e f e r t o a n d a d h e r e

t o wha t was

s e i 4 i n -

Tn

-

r e

F e d e r a t e d L i n u o r

anC

A l l i e d T n d u s t r i e s E m p l o y e e s

U n i o n

of

A u s t r a l i a :

Ex

n a r t e H u x t a b l e

f l 9 7 Q !

4 0

F . L . R .

d l R

a t

-

p p . 4 2 4 4 .

C o u n s e l

r e f e r r e d

also t o s e c t i o n s 1".5(3\ a n d

( A \ ,

'

r

1 6 7 f 3 ) ,

lh?%3,

370A(l.)

and

170A13) of t h e A c t , a s wel l

a s t h e

d e f i n l t i - o n

of

" o f f i c e "

a p p e a r j n s

i n

s . 3

of

t h e

Act

a n d

s . l 5 9 ( 1 ) .

I n

m y

o p i n l o n ,

t h e

C o u r t

has

- ~ u r i s r T i c t i o n t o

c o n d u c t

the

i n q l l i r y .

I n

S . ] 53(1\, re ference

is made

tm

" a n

e lec t ion

fo r

a n

o f f i c e

. .

.

111 a

h r a n c h o f

t.hc

o r q a n j z a t l o n " ,

w h i l e

S .165(

1

r c q u j r e s

t h c

C o l l r t

t o

i n q u i r e

i n t o

a n 3

3 e t e r m l n e

w h e t h e r

a n y

i r r e a u l a r i t y

h a s

o c c u r r e d

I n

or

in

c o n n e c t l m

with

the

e1 p r t . i o n

h c i n q

t.he

0 1 e c l - i o n

f o r

;.n

- 6 -

off ice ,

i n the

p resen t

c a s e

i n

the

P r a n c h .

T h e

i n q u i r y

i s

d i r e c t e d

t o

w h e t h e r

an

l r r e g u l a r j t y

has

o c c u r r e r 1

i n

or

i n

c o n n e c t i o n w i t h e n

e l e c t i o n

for

the

two

o f f ~ c e s

i n t h e n r a n c h

a l r e a d y

r e f e r r e d

to .

I n

t h e

a h s e n c -

of

a n y

d p c l a r a t i o n s

q l v e n

u n d e r

s.165

of

thc! A c t ,

and

i n t h e

a b s e n c e of

orders

t h a t may

h e made

u n d e r s.140

or s.141

of

t h e Act,

t h e p e r s o n s

d e c l a r e d

e l e c t e d

t o

t h o s e

o f f ices

w o u l d

e x e r c i s e

t h e

powers

c o n f e r r e d

u p o n

t h e m

b y

t h e

P r a n c h

r u l e s .

T t j S

c l e a r

t h a t

t h e e l e c t i o n s c h a l l e n q e d

? r e p l e c t i o n s

for

o f f i c e s w i t h i n

the

Branch and

t h a t t h e restricted meaninq

t o be

c r iven

t o

the

w o r d

" e l e c t i o n "

i n

t h e

c o n t e n t i o n

of

c o u n s e l

s h o u l d

n o t

be

a d o p t e d .

I n

f a c t ,

i t

j S

d j

f f i c l l l t

t o

s e e

a

q r e n t e r

j r r e q u l a r j t y , w i t h i n

the

o r d i n a r y r w a n i n q

of

t F l a t w o r d ,

i n

or

i n

c o n n e c t i o n

w i t h

a n

e l e c t l o n

i n

A

h r a n c h

t h a n

w h e r e

t h a t

e l e c t i o n

j s c o n d u r t e d p u r s u a n t

t o

u n r P n i s t P r e d r u l e s .

,--

I t f o l ~ o w s

t h a t

f o r

t h e

v e r y

r e a s o n s

e x p r e s s e r 1

hy

,'

c o u n s e l

for

t h e

r e s p o n d e n t s

o n

t h e

j u r i s d i c t i o n

p o i n t ,

i r r e g u l a i i t i e s o c c u r r e d i n

or

i n c o n n e c t i o n with

t h e e l e c t i o n

t o t h e two

of f lces t h e

s u h - j e c t

of

t h i s

i n q u i r y .

The

C o u r t

so

f i n d s .

I n

t h e s e

c i r c u m s t a n c e s

t h e

C o u r t

m u s t

. ? e t e r n i n e

what orders

s?mulii be

mad?:

see

S. 1 6 5 1 3 ) of

t h e 4 c t .

T h e r e

i s n o doubt

t h a t

h e

l e c t i o n

was

a n <

i s

v o i d .

I n

f a c t ,

cqnnscl

for

t h e

r e sDonAen t

s a id

it

was

a

n u l 1 ' t y .

Th c

p r o v i s i o n s

of

s . 1 6 5 f d )

a r e

s a t i s f i n d .

H o w c v c r ,

t h l -

terms

nf

*.

- 7 -

o f f i c e

o

f

t h e

t w o

p e r s o n s

p u r p o r t e d

to h a v e been

e l e c t e d

t o

t h ?

t w o

o f f i c e s

h a v e

a l r e a d y

e x p i r e ? ,

n a m e l y

o n

1 5

3.pril

19R3.

In t h o s e

c i r c u m s t a n c e s

t h e

o n l y

o r d e r

t h e

C o u r t

s h o u l d

make

i s t h a t

t h e e l e c t i o n

of

M r .

Brown

a n d

I l r .

Cook

t o

t h o s e

t w o

o f f i c e s

s h o u l d

h e

d e c l a r e d

v o i d .

T h e

Court

made

t h a t

o r d e r

o n

7 4 May

lQR3

bu t

r e . s e rved

i t s

r e a s o n s

for

so

d o j n q .

The

Court

now

publishes

t h o s e r e a s o n s .