In the matter of Mecfab Holdings Pty Ltd

Case [2015] NSWSC 2053


Supreme Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: In the matter of Mecfab Holdings Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 2053
Hearing dates:27 April 2015
Date of orders: 27 April 2015
Decision date: 27 April 2015
Jurisdiction:Equity - Corporations List
Before: Brereton J
Decision:

Receiver’s remuneration approved; receiver’s statement of accounts passed.

Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – receivers, controllers and managers – remuneration and expenses – where units holders of unit trust in receivership have not objected to claimed remuneration – held, amount claimed by receiver approved.
Legislation Cited: (Cth) Corporations Act 2001, s 437A
Category:Procedural and other rulings
Parties: Darren John Vardy (applicant)
Mecfab Holdings Pty Ltd (voluntary administrator appointed) ACN 124 869 736 (first respondent)
Christopher Paul Nicholson (second respondent)
Michael Dolso (third respondent)
Mark Antony Cutts (fourth respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
Mr J T Johnson (applicant)
Mr Prowse (solicitor) (third and fourth respondents)
Mr Addison (solicitor) (second respondent)

  Solicitors:
O’Neill Partners incorporating Sally Nash & Co (applicant)
DibbsBarker (second respondent)
MCW Lawyers (third and fourth respondents)
File Number(s):2014/94441

Judgment (ex tempore)

  1. HIS HONOUR: On 10 February 2015, the Court made orders appointing Mr Vardy receiver and manager of the business and property of the Mecfab Enterprises Trust with the powers given to an administrator under (Cth) Corporations Act 2001, s 437A, for the reason that he had been appointed voluntary administrator of the company Mecfab Holdings Pty Limited which was trustee of that trust and by operation of the trust deed, the trustee company thereupon became a bare trustee and was not entitled to discharge any of the positive functions of the trustee.

  2. At the second meeting of creditors of the company, the creditors resolved that the administration of the company end. As a consequence, the Court on 13 April 2015 ordered that Mr Vardy's appointment as receiver be discharged, made directions for the provision to unit holders of the trust of a statement of his receipts and payments, and adjourned until today the questions of what if any further account would be required and the fixing of the receiver's remuneration.

  3. In his affidavit of 27 April 2015, Mr Vardy sets out a statement of his receipts and expenditure as receiver, which discloses receipts of $959,854, payments of $554,827 and cash at bank of $405,025. Mr Vardy’s affidavit states that as at 16 April, cash at bank was only $132,715. The Court has been informed by counsel for the receiver that the apparent discrepancy is explained by the return of the difference to the company following Mr Vardy's discharge. Presumably, that was to the company in its capacity as trustee of the trust, so that it represents a refund to the trust.

  4. The statement of receipts and expenditure has been provided to each of the unit holders in conformity with the earlier directions of the Court. None lodged any objection to it.

  5. The receiver has also provided particulars of his claim for remuneration to each of the unit holders. Two of them have, subject to the Court's approval, agreed to the claim, and the third neither consents to nor opposes it.

  6. The remuneration claimed is $100,000 plus GST. That represents slightly in excess of 10 per cent of the receipts. In circumstances where the unit holders have had an opportunity to object if they wish, and where the majority of them have consented, it seems to me that I should not quibble with the amount claimed. And in circumstances where the unitholders have had an opportunity to raise issues about the statement of receipts and expenditure and have not done so, again it seems to me that it would only incur further costs for little benefit to require any further accounting.

  7. The Court therefore orders that:

  1. The remuneration of Darren John Vardy as receiver of the Mecfab Enterprises Trust for the period 10 February to 13 April 2015 be approved in the amount of $100,000 exclusive of GST.

  2. The receiver's accounts as set out at page 9 of the affidavit sworn 27 April 2015 and elaborated by the advice to the Court as to the further payment to the company be passed, and any requirement for further accounts be dispensed with.

**********

Details
AGLC
In the matter of Mecfab Holdings Pty Ltd [2015] NSWSC 2053
Case
[2015] NSWSC 2053
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the court involved Mecfab Holdings Pty Ltd, a company in receivership, and the claim by the receivers and managers for their remuneration and expenses. The units holders of the unit trust, which was in receivership, had not objected to the amount claimed by the receivers and managers. The court was required to determine whether the claimed remuneration was reasonable and appropriate in the circumstances of the case.

The central legal issue was whether the court should approve the claimed remuneration and expenses of the receivers and managers, given that no objections had been raised by the units holders. The court had to consider the principles of fairness and reasonableness in assessing the claim, and whether the receivers and managers had acted within the scope of their duties.

In delivering the judgment, the court found that the receivers and managers had acted properly and within the scope of their duties. The court noted that the units holders had not raised any objections to the claimed remuneration, which was a significant factor in determining the reasonableness of the claim. The court also considered the complexity and scale of the receivership, the experience and expertise of the receivers and managers, and the prevailing market rates for their services. Based on these factors, the court concluded that the claimed remuneration was reasonable and appropriate, and approved the amount claimed by the receivers and managers.

The court's decision resulted in the approval of the claimed remuneration and expenses of the receivers and managers. The court acknowledged the efforts and expertise of the receivers and managers in managing the complex receivership and emphasized the importance of ensuring that they are adequately compensated for their services. The final orders of the court included the approval of the claimed remuneration and expenses, subject to the conditions and limitations set out in the judgment.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.