Imperial Public Officers Embezzlement Act re-enacted Act 1845 No 2a (NSW)

Case
No judgment structure available for this case.

No. I I .

An Act to adopt an Act for more effectually pre­ venting Embezzlement by Persons employed in the Public Service of Her Majesty in the Colony of New South Wales. [28th August, 1845.]

WHEREAS an Act of the Imperial Parliament was passed in

the second year of the reign of His late Majesty King William the Fourth intituled " An Act for more effectually preventing Embez-

" elements by persons employed in the Public Service of His Majesty "

and whereas it is expedient that the provisions of the same should be adopted in the Colony of New South Wales Be it enacted by the Governor of the said Colony by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Council thereof That the said recited Act shall he and is hereby adopted accordingly and that from and after the passing of

this Act if any person employed in the service of Her Majesty in the

said Colony and entrusted by virtue of such employment with the receipt custody management or control of any chattel money or valu­ able security shall embezzle the same or any part thereof or in any manner fraudulently apply or dispose of the same or any part thereof to his own use or benefit or for any purpose whatsoever except for the public service every such offender shall be deemed to have stolen the same and shall be deemed guilty of felony and on being thereof con- victed in due form of law shall be liable at the discretion of the Court to be transported beyond the seas for any term not exceeding fourteen years nor less than seven years or to be imprisoned with or without

hard labor as to the Court shall seem meet for any term not exceed­
ing three years.

2. And be it enacted That every tally order or other security whatsoever entitling or evidencing the title of any person or body corporate to any share or interest in any public stock or fund whether of the United Kingdom or of Great Britain or of Ireland or of any Foreign State or to any share or interest in any fund of any body corporate company or society or to any deposit in any Savings' Bank and every debenture deed bond bill note warrant order or other security whatsoever for money or for payment of money whether of the United Kingdom or of the said Colony or of any Foreign State or Country and every warrant or order for the delivery or transfer of any goods or valuable thing shall throughout this Act be deemed for every purpose to be included under and denoted by the words "valuable security" and that if any person so employed and entrusted as aforesaid shall embezzle or fraudulently apply or dispose of any such valuable

security

security as aforesaid he shall be deemed to have stolen the same within the intent and meaning" of this Act and shall be punishable thereby in the same manner as if he had stolen any chattel of like value with the share interest or deposit to which such security may

relate or with the money due on such security or secured thereby and
remaining unsatisfied or with the value of the goods or other valuable

thing mentioned in such security.

3. And be it enacted That it shall be lawful to charge in the

information or indictment to be preferred against any offender under

this Act and to proceed against him for any number of distinct
acts of embezzlement or of fraudulent application or disposition as aforesaid not exceeding three which may have been committed
by him within the space of six calendar months from the first to
the last of such acts and in every such information or indictment where the offence shall relate to any money or any valuable secu­
rity it shall be sufficient to allege the embezzlement or fraudulent
application or disposition to be of money without specifying any particular coin or valuable security and such allegation so far as it regards the description of the property shall be sustained if the offender shall be proved to have embezzled any amount although the particular species of coin or valuable security of which such amount was composed shall not be proved or if he shall be proved to have embezzled any piece of coin or any valuable security or any portion of the value thereof although such piece of coin or valuable security may have been delivered to him in order that some part of the value thereof should be returned to the party delivering the same and although such
part shall have been returned accordingly.

4. And be it enacted That in every case of embezzlement or fraudulent application or disposition as aforesaid of any chattel money or valuable security it shall be lawful in the order of committal by the Justice of the Peace before whom the offender shall be charged and in the information or indictment to be preferred against such offender to lay the property of any such chattel money or valuable security as aforesaid in Her Majesty the Queen.

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0