Imbree v McNeilly [No 2]; McNeilly v Imbree [No 2]
Case
•
[2008] HCA 47
•26 September 2008
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Imbree v McNeilly [No 2]; McNeilly v Imbree [No 2] [2008] HCA 47
[2008] HCA 47
26 September 2008
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The High Court of Australia considered the appeal and cross-appeal in *Imbree v McNeilly [No 2]* and *McNeilly v Imbree [No 2]*. The dispute concerned the assessment of damages and costs following a motor vehicle accident.
The primary legal issues before the High Court were the appropriate assessment of the plaintiff's damages, including the extent of contributory negligence, and the basis upon which costs should be awarded, particularly in light of a *Calderbank* offer made by the defendants.
The Court reasoned that the plaintiff's damages, before reduction for contributory negligence, should be assessed at $11,323,622.46. It determined that a reduction of 30 per cent for contributory negligence was appropriate. Crucially, the Court ordered that the plaintiff should recover the costs of the proceedings at first instance on the ordinary basis up to 22 March 2006, and thereafter on an indemnity basis, reflecting the significance of the *Calderbank* offer made by the defendants. The Court also ordered that the costs of the appeal and cross-appeal to the Court of Appeal, as well as the costs of the appeal to the High Court, be assessed on an indemnity basis.
The primary legal issues before the High Court were the appropriate assessment of the plaintiff's damages, including the extent of contributory negligence, and the basis upon which costs should be awarded, particularly in light of a *Calderbank* offer made by the defendants.
The Court reasoned that the plaintiff's damages, before reduction for contributory negligence, should be assessed at $11,323,622.46. It determined that a reduction of 30 per cent for contributory negligence was appropriate. Crucially, the Court ordered that the plaintiff should recover the costs of the proceedings at first instance on the ordinary basis up to 22 March 2006, and thereafter on an indemnity basis, reflecting the significance of the *Calderbank* offer made by the defendants. The Court also ordered that the costs of the appeal and cross-appeal to the Court of Appeal, as well as the costs of the appeal to the High Court, be assessed on an indemnity basis.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Negligence & Tort
Legal Concepts
-
Costs
-
Damages
-
Appeal
-
Negligence
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Biggs v O'Connor [2021] VSC 826
Cases Citing This Decision
34
Stewart v Metro North Hospital and Health Service
[2025] HCA 34
Kuhl v Zurich Financial Services Australia Ltd
[2011] HCA 11
Miller v Miller
[2011] HCA 9
Cases Cited
3
Statutory Material Cited
1
Imbree v McNeilly
[2008] HCA 40
Brymount Pty Ltd v Cummins (No 2)
[2005] NSWCA 69
Baresic v Slingshot Holdings Pty Ltd (No 2)
[2005] NSWCA 160
Cited Sections