Imax Corporation v Vago Imports Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2002] ATMO 80
•23 September 2002
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Imax Corporation v Vago Imports Pty Ltd [2002] ATMO 80
[2002] ATMO 80
23 September 2002
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Imax Corporation (the applicant) sought to register the trade mark IMAX in Class 25 for clothing and headgear. Vago Imports Pty Ltd (the opponent) opposed this application, relying on its prior use of the plain word mark IMAX in the same class for identical goods. The matter came before the Australian Trade Marks Office.
The primary legal issue for determination was whether the opponent's prior use of the plain word mark IMAX in Class 25 for clothing and headgear established sufficient rights to oppose the applicant's proposed registration of the same mark for the same goods. This involved assessing the distinctiveness of the mark and the extent of the opponent's use.
The Trade Marks Office found that the opponent had indeed used the plain word mark IMAX since 1996 in respect of clothing and headgear, which were identical to the goods specified by the applicant. This established the opponent's prior rights in the trade mark for those goods. Consequently, the opponent was entitled to oppose the applicant's application.
The primary legal issue for determination was whether the opponent's prior use of the plain word mark IMAX in Class 25 for clothing and headgear established sufficient rights to oppose the applicant's proposed registration of the same mark for the same goods. This involved assessing the distinctiveness of the mark and the extent of the opponent's use.
The Trade Marks Office found that the opponent had indeed used the plain word mark IMAX since 1996 in respect of clothing and headgear, which were identical to the goods specified by the applicant. This established the opponent's prior rights in the trade mark for those goods. Consequently, the opponent was entitled to oppose the applicant's application.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Commercial Law
-
Intellectual Property
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
L.F.P Inc v Supre Pty Ltd [2005] ATMO 31
Cases Citing This Decision
3
South African Airways (Proprietary) Limited v Virtuoso, Ltd
[2011] ATMO 30
L.F.P Inc v Supre Pty Ltd
[2005] ATMO 31
L.F.P Inc v Hustler Australia Pty Ltd
[2005] ATMO 30
Cases Cited
6
Statutory Material Cited
0
PB Foods Ltd v Malanda Dairy Foods Ltd
[1999] FCA 1602
PB Foods Ltd v Malanda Dairy Foods Ltd
[1999] FCA 1602
Registrar of Trade Marks v Woolworths
[1999] FCA 1020