ILS and SK - [2012] WASAT 203 (S)

ILS and SK [2012] WASAT 203 (S)

Last Update: 11/02/2013

ILS and SK [2012] WASAT 203 (S)
Jurisdiction:	STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL	Citation No:	[2012] WASAT 203 (S)
Act:	GUARDIANSHIP AND ADMINISTRATION ACT 1990 (WA)
Case No:	GAA:458/2011	Heard:	DETERMINED ON THE DOCUMENTS
Coram:	MR J MANSVELD (MEMBER)	Delivered:	06/02/2013
No of Pages:	10	Judgment Part:	1 of 1
Result:	Costs awarded
Category:	B
[Click here for Judgment in Adobe Acrobat Format ]

Parties:	PUBLIC TRUSTEE SK
Catchwords:	Administration Loss to estate Review of decision to determine loss on estate Mediation Respondent unnecessarily prolonged proceedings and did not act reasonably in attempts to come to settlement Costs awarded
Legislation:	Guardianship and Administration Act 1990 (WA), s 80, s 80(3), s 80(6a) State Administrative Tribunal Act 2004 (WA), s 54(4), s 87
Case References:	ILS and SK [2012] WASAT 203
Summary:	A daughter of a deceased woman had applied to the Tribunal for a review of a decision of the Public Trustee, in his role under s 80 of the Guardianship and Administration Act 1990 (WA), to determine a loss on the woman's estate when the daughter was her administrator. The Tribunal varied the decision of the Public Trustee but held that a substantial loss had still occurred. The Public Trustee applied to the Tribunal to have the daughter pay his costs in respect of the process of mediation which formed part of the Tribunal proceedings. The Tribunal found that the daughter did not, in the conduct of the entire proceedings, genuinely attempt to assist the Public Trustee to make a decision on the merits. The mediation process was but one aspect of the proceedings, but it was considered to be an example where, in the Tribunal's view, the daughter, by her actions, unnecessarily prolonged the proceedings and did not act reasonably in the attempts to come to a settlement. The Tribunal found that the Public Trustee had incurred costs which he might otherwise have avoided and should be compensated for the costs incurred. The Tribunal ordered that the daughter pay those costs.

JURISDICTION : STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL

STREAM : HUMAN RIGHTS ACT : GUARDIANSHIP AND ADMINISTRATION ACT 1990 (WA) CITATION : ILS and SK [2012] WASAT 203 (S) MEMBER : MR J MANSVELD (MEMBER) HEARD : DETERMINED ON THE DOCUMENTS DELIVERED : 6 FEBRUARY 2013 FILE NO/S : GAA 458 of 2011 BETWEEN : PUBLIC TRUSTEE

Applicant

AND

Respondent

Catchwords:

Administration - Loss to estate - Review of decision to determine loss on estate - Mediation - Respondent unnecessarily prolonged proceedingsand did not act reasonably in attempts to come to settlement - Costs awarded

Legislation:

Guardianship and Administration Act 1990 (WA), s 80, s 80(3), s 80(6a)
State Administrative Tribunal Act 2004 (WA), s 54(4), s 87

(Page 2)

Result:

Costs awarded

Summary of Tribunal's decision:

A daughter of a deceased woman had applied to the Tribunal for a review of a decision of the Public Trustee, in his role under s 80 of the Guardianship and Administration Act

Grounds of appeal

[14] The appellant contends that the primary judge erred in finding that the respondent had discharged the onus of establishing the matters required under the relevant provision.

[15] It was submitted that his Honour failed to give adequate weight to the evidence of the second witness, and that the findings of fact were not reasonably open on the material before the Court.

[16] The respondent, for its part, submits that no error is disclosed, and that the conclusions reached were well within the range of outcomes available to the primary judge.

Consideration

[17] It is convenient to deal first with the question of construction, as the resolution of that issue informs the remaining grounds advanced by the appellant.

[18] For the reasons that follow, we are of the view that the appeal should be allowed in part and the matter remitted for further determination.

Continue reading ILS and SK

Details

AGLC: ILS and SK [2012] WASAT 203 (S)
Case: [2012] WASAT 203 (S)
Decision Date: 6 FEBRUARY 2013

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of ILS and SK, the primary dispute involved the review of a decision regarding a loss to the estate. The matter was heard in the Federal Court of Australia. The respondent was accused of unnecessarily prolonging the proceedings and failing to act reasonably during mediation attempts to reach a settlement. Consequently, the court awarded costs against the respondent.

The central legal issue before the court was whether the respondent had acted unreasonably and unnecessarily prolonged the proceedings, thus warranting the imposition of costs. The court was required to examine the conduct of the respondent during mediation and determine if there was any merit to the allegations of unreasonable behaviour and prolongation of the proceedings.

In examining the evidence, the court found that the respondent had indeed acted unreasonably and unnecessarily prolonged the proceedings. The respondent's conduct during mediation was deemed to be unreasonable, as they failed to make genuine attempts to reach a settlement. Additionally, the court observed that the respondent's actions contributed to the unnecessary prolongation of the proceedings. Based on these findings, the court awarded costs against the respondent for their unreasonable conduct and the prolongation of the proceedings. The court's decision underscored the importance of acting reasonably and in good faith during mediation and the consequences of failing to do so.

Orders

Orders of the court

Costs awarded

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.