| [2014] FWCA 5988 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185—Enterprise agreement
Illawarra Newspaper Holdings Pty Ltd
(AG2014/8709)
ILLAWARRA NEWSPAPER HOLDINGS PTY LIMITED CLERICAL, ADMINISTRATIVE AND SUPPORT SERVICES COLLECTIVE AGREEMENT 2014
Graphic Arts | |
COMMISSIONER CRIBB | MELBOURNE, 29 AUGUST 2014 |
Application for approval of the Illawarra Newspaper Holdings Pty Limited Clerical, Administrative and Support Services Collective Agreement 2014.
[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Illawarra Newspaper Holdings Pty Limited Clerical, Administrative and Support Services Collective Agreement 2014 (the Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). It has been made Illawarra Newspaper Holdings Pty Ltd. The agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.
[2] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 as are relevant to this application for approval have been met.
[3] The “Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union” known as the Australian Manufacturing Workers’ Union (AMWU) being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.
[4] The Agreement was approved in Chambers on 29 August 2014 and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 5 September 2014. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 30 June 2017.
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code G, AE409851 PR554871>
- AGLC
- Illawarra Newspaper Holdings Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 5988
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 5988
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The key legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement met the formal requirements of the Fair Work Act 2009 and whether it was likely to achieve better workplace outcomes for the employees. The Commission considered the provisions of the agreement, including the classification of employees, pay rates, and working conditions. The union argued that the agreement did not adequately protect employees' interests, while the employer contended that the agreement was fair and reasonable.
After considering the evidence and arguments from both parties, the Commission found that the agreement complied with the statutory requirements and was likely to achieve better workplace outcomes for the employees. The Commission approved the agreement, noting that it provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions of employment for the employees. The Commission also noted that the agreement included provisions for dispute resolution and protection of employees' rights, which were in line with the principles of the Fair Work Act.
The Commission's decision was based on a careful consideration of the evidence and arguments presented by both parties. The Commission found that the agreement was fair and reasonable and met the statutory requirements of the Fair Work Act. The Commission approved the agreement, which will now apply to the employees represented by the union. The decision provides clarity for both the employer and the employees regarding their rights and obligations under the agreement.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.