| CERTIFICATE OF DETERMINATION OF MEMBER | |
| CITATION: | Ilin v State of New South Wales (Northern Sydney Local Health District) [2024] NSWPIC 565 |
| APPLICANT: | Svetlana Ilin |
| RESPONDENT: | State of New South Wales (Northern Sydney Local Health District) |
| MEMBER: | Rachel Homan |
| DATE OF DECISION: | 11 October 2024 |
| CATCHWORDS: | WORKERS COMPENSATION - Workers Compensation Act 1987; claim for weekly compensation and compensation pursuant to section 60 for the costs of, and incidental to, right shoulder surgery; whether injury to right shoulder due to repetitive data entry over a period of approximately 10 years; delay in reporting a work-related cause for the shoulder symptoms; whether symptoms were emanating from cervical pathology; Held – the applicant discharged her onus of establishing on the balance of probabilities that she had sustained an injury to her right shoulder to which employment with the respondent was the main contributing factor; the surgery was reasonably necessary as a result of injury; the applicant was totally incapacitated for work following the surgery as claimed; awards in favour of the applicant. |
| DETERMINATIONS MADE: | The Commission determines: 1. The applicant sustained an injury to her right shoulder to which her employment with the respondent was the main contributing factor pursuant to s 4(b) of the Workers Compensation Act 1987. 2. The right shoulder arthroscopy, subacromial decompression, acromioplasty, biceps tenodesis, supraspinatus tendon excision of calcium, possible rotator cuff repair and interval release surgery performed by Dr Sushil Pant was reasonably necessary as a result of injury pursuant to s 60 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987. 3. The respondent to pay the reasonably necessary costs of and incidental to the surgery in accordance with s 60 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987. 4. The claim for weekly compensation for the period 1 April 2024 to 21 April 2024 is discontinued. 5. The Application to Resolve a Dispute is amended to claim weekly compensation for the period from 27 August 2024 to 15 September 2024 based on a pre-injury average weekly earnings (PIAWE) rate of $2,306.49. 6. The respondent to pay the applicant weekly compensation pursuant to s 36(1) of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 from 27 August 2024 to 15 September 2024 based on the agreed PIAWE rate of $2,306.49. |
STATEMENT OF REASONS
BACKGROUND
Ms Svetlana Ilin (the applicant) was employed by the State of New South Wales (Northern Sydney Local Health District) (the respondent) as a coder for approximately 11 years.
The applicant claims that she sustained an injury to her dominant right shoulder due to the repetitive nature of her work.
The respondent’s insurer disputed liability for the right shoulder injury in a notice issued pursuant to s 78 of the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998 (the 1998 Act) on 1 May 2024.
The applicant sought internal review of that decision in correspondence from her solicitor, dated 9 May 2024. That correspondence annexed a request, dated 3 May 2024, from Dr Sushil Pant seeking approval for a right shoulder arthroscopy, subacromial decompression, acromioplasty, biceps tenodesis, supraspinatus tendon excision…
Continue reading Ilin v State of New South Wales (Northern Sydney Local Healt...
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Ilin v State of New South Wales (Northern Sydney Local Health District) [2024] NSWPIC 565
- Case
- [2024] NSWPIC 565
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the applicant had established on the balance of probabilities that her right shoulder injury was attributable to her employment, and whether the surgery was reasonably necessary as a result of the injury. The court also needed to determine whether Ms Ilin was totally incapacitated for work following the surgery as she had claimed.
The court found that Ms Ilin had discharged her onus of proof, establishing on the balance of probabilities that her right shoulder injury was caused by repetitive data entry over a period of approximately ten years, and that her employment was the main contributing factor. The court accepted that the delay in reporting the injury did not preclude a finding in her favour, and that the surgery was reasonably necessary. The applicant was also found to be totally incapacitated for work following the surgery, as she had claimed. The court therefore made awards in favour of Ms Ilin for both weekly compensation and compensation for the costs of surgery.
No additional orders were made by the court.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.