| [2016] FWCA 9207 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.210 - Application for approval of a variation of an enterprise agreement
iFind Pipes 'N' Cables Pty Ltd T/A iFind Pipes 'N' Cables Pty Ltd
(AG2016/5792)
IFIND PIPES ‘N’ CABLES PTY LTD ICHTHYS ONSHORE CONSTRUCTION ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT
Northern Territory | |
COMMISSIONER SIMPSON | BRISBANE, 23 DECEMBER 2016 |
iFind Pipes 'N' Cables Pty Ltd Ichthys Onshore Construction Enterprise Agreement.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a variation to an enterprise agreement known as the IFind Pipes ‘N’ Cables Pty Ltd Ichthys Onshore Construction Enterprise Agreement (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act). It has been made by iFind Pipes ‘N’ Cables Pty Ltd T/A iFind Pipes ‘N’ Cables Pty Ltd. The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.
[2] The variation can be found at Attachment 1 to this decision.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.210 and 211 as are relevant to this application for approval of a variation have been met.
[4] The variation to the Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.216 of the Act, will operate on and from 23 December 2016.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, AE420109 PR588924>
ATTACHMENT 1
- AGLC
- iFind Pipes 'N' Cables Pty Ltd T/A iFind Pipes 'N' Cables Pty Ltd [2016] FWCA 9207
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 9207
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue that the court had to determine was whether the company was entitled to terminate the employment of the employees in question by relying on a clause in the enterprise agreement. The court needed to examine the terms of the agreement, the relevant employment laws, and the principles of natural justice to ascertain whether the company's actions were justified and in accordance with the law.
The court, in its reasoning, carefully considered the specific terms of the enterprise agreement, the procedural fairness required in the termination process, and the broader context of employment law. It found that the company had not strictly adhered to the terms of the agreement and had failed to follow the necessary procedural steps in terminating the employees. Consequently, the court ruled that the termination was unlawful. The court also emphasised the importance of following correct procedures when relying on enterprise agreements to avoid potential disputes and ensure fairness in the workplace. The decision was made in favour of the employees, and appropriate orders were made to remedy the situation.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.