IBX

Case [2014] NSWCATGD 3


NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: IBX [2014] NSWCATGD 3
Hearing dates:24 January 2014
Decision date: 24 January 2014
Jurisdiction:Guardianship Division
Before: D'Arcy J, Senior Member (Legal)
Hollis J, Senior Member (Professional)
Circuitt M, General Member (Community)
Decision:

Limited guardianship order made for a period of 12 months; Public Guardian appointed with accommodation, services, health care and medical and dental consent functions.

Financial management order made with exclusion of pension; NSW Trustee and Guardian appointed.

Catchwords:

GUARDIANSHIP - application for guardianship order - subject person refusing services and accommodation decisions - subject person objecting to order - limited guardianship order.

FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT - application for financial management order - sale of property - capacity to instruct solicitor - vulnerability to exploitation - order made with exclusion.
Legislation Cited: Guardianship Act 1987 (NSW)
Cases Cited: Re GHI (a protected person) [2005] NSWSC 581
PY v RJS [1982] 2 NSWLR 700
H v H (unreported) NSW Supreme Court 20 March 2000
McD v McD (1983) 3 NSWLR 81
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Mr IBX
Mrs FNN (Applicant)
Ms KAO (Applicant)
The Public Guardian
The NSW Trustee and Guardian
File Number(s):55336
Publication restriction:Decisions of the Guardianship Division of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal have been anonymised to remove any information that may identify any person involved in the Tribunal's proceedings (s 65, Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW)).

reasons for decision

  1. The Tribunal appointed the Public Guardian as Mr IBX's guardian for a period of 12 months to make decisions on his behalf about his accommodation, services, health care and consent to medical and dental treatment as set out in the Tribunal's Order.

  1. The Tribunal committed the estate of Mr IBX to the NSW Trustee and Guardian.

Background

  1. Mr IBX is an 85-year-old man of Austrian background. For the past 20 years he has lived alone on a property in regional NSW which is jointly owned with his friend, Mr SED. He is said to have limited social contacts and is reported to have dementia.

  1. On 27 December 2013 Mr IBX was admitted to regional hospital A following a fall.

  1. On 16 January 2014 Ms KAO, social worker, regional hospital A, applied for the NSW Trustee to be appointed as his financial manager because a purchaser had been found for the property and the sale of the property jointly owned by him and Mr SED was imminent.

  1. On 22 January 2014 Mrs FNN, manager, Service Provider Z applied for the Public Guardian to be appointed as Mr IBX's guardian because his failing health and mobility prevent him from living on the property where there is no power, no running water and an infestation of beetles in his bedding and around his home. He is a major falls risk. When his living conditions are discussed with him he threatens to leave to live in Austria.

  1. A list of parties to the review and witnesses at the hearing is attached as an appendix to these…

Continue reading IBX

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
IBX [2014] NSWCATGD 3
Case
[2014] NSWCATGD 3
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The case before the Court involved an application for a guardianship order in relation to an individual, referred to as IBX. IBX was refusing to consent to services and accommodation decisions, and objected to the order. The Court was required to determine whether a guardianship order was necessary and, if so, what functions should be assigned to the guardian. Additionally, the Court considered an application for a financial management order, specifically regarding the sale of property and the capacity of IBX to instruct a solicitor, as well as IBX's vulnerability to exploitation.

The legal issues before the Court included whether IBX had the capacity to make decisions about services and accommodation, and whether IBX's objection to the order was valid. The Court also had to assess whether a financial management order was necessary, taking into account IBX's capacity to instruct a solicitor and the risk of exploitation. The Court needed to determine if the appointment of a financial manager was required, and if so, whether the order should include an exclusion regarding the pension.

The Court found that IBX lacked the capacity to make decisions about services and accommodation, and that their objection to the order was not valid. The Court concluded that a guardianship order was necessary to protect IBX and appointed the Public Guardian with specific functions, including accommodation, services, health care, and medical and dental consent. Regarding the financial management order, the Court determined that IBX's capacity to instruct a solicitor was limited and that there was a risk of exploitation. The Court made a financial management order with an exclusion of the pension and appointed the NSW Trustee and Guardian.

The Court's final orders included a limited guardianship order for a period of 12 months, appointing the Public Guardian with specified functions. The Court also made a financial management order with an exclusion of the pension, appointing the NSW Trustee and Guardian.

Orders

Orders of the court

Limited guardianship order made for a period of 12 months; Public Guardian appointed with accommodation, services, health care and medical and dental consent functions.

Financial management order made with exclusion of pension; NSW Trustee and Guardian appointed.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.