Ibrahim v Wu (No 2)

[2009] FCA 1151

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Ibrahim v Wu (No 2) [2009] FCA 1151

TAREK IBRAHIM v JINGSHAN WU and UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA

WAD 101 of 2009

SIOPIS J
24 SEPTEMBER 2009
PERTH

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION	WAD 101 of 2009

BETWEEN:

TAREK IBRAHIM
Applicant

AND:

JINGSHAN WU
First Respondent

UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA
Second Respondent

JUDGE:	SIOPIS J
DATE OF ORDER:	24 SEPTEMBER 2009
WHERE MADE:	PERTH

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.The applicant’s oral application that this proceeding be indefinitely stayed is dismissed.

2.By 4:00 pm on 15 October 2009, the applicant is to file and serve a statement of claim, setting out the basis of his claim and the provisions of the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) upon which he relies for the relief claimed.

3.Costs are in the cause.

Note:Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules.

The text of entered orders can be located using eSearch on the Court’s website.

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION	WAD 101 of 2009

BETWEEN:

TAREK IBRAHIM
Applicant

AND:

JINGSHAN WU
First Respondent

UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA
Second Respondent

JUDGE:	SIOPIS J
DATE:	24 SEPTEMBER 2009
PLACE:	PERTH

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

1. This is an application which Mr Ibrahim has made orally today to stay any further conduct of this proceeding until such time as he has made an application for leave to appeal and that application for leave to appeal has been determined.  Mr Ibrahim has advised me that he intends to seek leave to appeal from the decision which I handed down earlier today whereby I refused to disqualify myself from continuing to case manage this proceeding (Ibrahim v Wu [2009] FCA 1083). Mr Ibrahim opposes the Court making directions for the further progress of the proceeding.

2. For the reasons set out in Ibrahim v Carroll (No 2) [2009] FCA 1150, I dismiss Mr Ibrahim’s application to stay the further progress of this proceeding.

I certify that the preceding two (2) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Siopis.

Associate:
Dated:        8 October 2009

Counsel for the Applicant:	The applicant appeared in person.
Counsel for the First and Second Respondents:	Ms KE Primrose
Solicitor for the First and Second Respondents:	Jackson McDonald

Date of Hearing:	24 September 2009
Date of Judgment:	24 September 2009