Ian Morgan Ramsey v

Case

[2014] FWC 9149

16 DECEMBER 2014

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2014] FWC 9149
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.394—Unfair dismissal

Ian Morgan Ramsey
v
(U2014/9607)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOOLEY

MELBOURNE, 16 DECEMBER 2014

Application for relief from unfair dismissal.

[1] On 7 October 2014, Mr Ian Morgan Ramsey made an application for remedy for unfair dismissal pursuant to s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009.

[2] The application was lodged using the Fair Work Commission (the Commission)’s efiling system. Mr Ramsay did not provide an application on a Commission approved form (Form F2). In place of an application, he attached an email which advised that he wanted to lodge a claim for unfair dismissal however as he was overseas he was unable to provide any further information.

[3] On 7 October 2014, Mr Ramsey was contacted by telephone to advise that he needed to submit a completed form if he wished to proceed with his application. Mr Ramsey stated that he would do that as soon as possible.

[4] On 7 November 2014, Mr Ramsey was reminded by email correspondence that he needs to send a complete form if he wished to proceed with his application.

[5] To date, Mr Ramsey has not contacted the Commission or provided the necessary details as requested.

[6] Section 587(1) of the Act provides:

“587 Dismissing applications
(1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:
    (a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or
    (b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or
    (c) the application has no reasonable prospects of success.”

[7] In these circumstances, I have determined that the application was not made in accordance with the Act.

[8] Consequently, the application is dismissed under s.587(1)(a) of the Act.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR559148>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0