IAIN BRUCE SIMMONS
v
THE QUEEN
[2016] HCASL 37
B66/2015
The applicant advances no arguable ground of appeal against the decision of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Queensland (Gotterson JA, Morrison JA and Douglas J agreeing). Accordingly, an appeal to this Court would enjoy no prospect of success to warrant a grant of special leave.
Pursuant to r 41.11.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.
G.A.A. Nettle
6 April 2016M.M. Gordon
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Iain Bruce Simmons v The Queen and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2016] HCASL 37
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court were whether there were any arguable grounds of appeal against the decision of the Court of Appeal. The applicant had to establish that the Court of Appeal had erred in law and that such an error had affected the outcome of the appeal. The court had to determine whether the decision of the Court of Appeal was correct and whether there was any prospect of success in an appeal to the High Court.
The court found that the applicant had not advanced any arguable ground of appeal against the decision of the Court of Appeal. The court found that the decision of the Court of Appeal was correct and that there was no prospect of success in an appeal to the High Court. The court noted that the Court of Appeal had carefully considered the evidence and the law and had reached a decision that was open to it. The court found that the decision of the Court of Appeal was not affected by any error of law.
The court dismissed the application for special leave to appeal. Pursuant to rule 41.11.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), the Registrar was directed to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application. The court noted that the decision of the Court of Appeal was final and binding and that the applicant had no further right of appeal.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.