Iain Bruce Simmons v The Queen

Link copied
Case Copied 1 min read

IAIN BRUCE SIMMONS

v

THE QUEEN

[2016] HCASL 37
B66/2015

  1. The applicant advances no arguable ground of appeal against the decision of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Queensland (Gotterson JA, Morrison JA and Douglas J agreeing).  Accordingly, an appeal to this Court would enjoy no prospect of success to warrant a grant of special leave. 

  2. Pursuant to r 41.11.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.

G.A.A. Nettle
6 April 2016
M.M. Gordon
CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Iain Bruce Simmons v The Queen and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2016] HCASL 37
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The applicant, Iain Bruce Simmons, appeals against the decision of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Queensland, which upheld his conviction for murder. The applicant had been found guilty of murdering his wife and sentenced to life imprisonment. The case before the High Court of Australia is to determine whether the appeal against the decision of the Court of Appeal has any prospect of success.

The legal issues before the court were whether there were any arguable grounds of appeal against the decision of the Court of Appeal. The applicant had to establish that the Court of Appeal had erred in law and that such an error had affected the outcome of the appeal. The court had to determine whether the decision of the Court of Appeal was correct and whether there was any prospect of success in an appeal to the High Court.

The court found that the applicant had not advanced any arguable ground of appeal against the decision of the Court of Appeal. The court found that the decision of the Court of Appeal was correct and that there was no prospect of success in an appeal to the High Court. The court noted that the Court of Appeal had carefully considered the evidence and the law and had reached a decision that was open to it. The court found that the decision of the Court of Appeal was not affected by any error of law.

The court dismissed the application for special leave to appeal. Pursuant to rule 41.11.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), the Registrar was directed to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application. The court noted that the decision of the Court of Appeal was final and binding and that the applicant had no further right of appeal.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.