HV Rail Pty Limited - [2023] FWCA 1776

[2023] FWCA 1776

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185—Enterprise agreement

s.218A—Enterprise agreement

HV Rail Pty Limited

(AG2023/1699)

HV RAIL TERMINAL (QLD) ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2023

Rail industry
COMMISSIONER MIRABELLA	MELBOURNE, 19 JUNE 2023

Application for approval of the HV Rail Terminal (QLD) Enterprise Agreement 2023 - application to vary the HV Rail Terminal (QLD) Enterprise Agreement 2023 to correct or amend obvious error.

Approval

HV Rail Pty Limited (the Employer) has made an application for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the HV Rail Terminal (QLD) Enterprise Agreement 2023 (the Agreement) pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

On the basis of the material contained in the application and accompanying declaration, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of sections 186, 187 and 188, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.

Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

I observe that certain provisions of the Agreement are likely to be inconsistent with the National Employment Standards (the NES). However, noting clauses 2.2-2.3 of the Agreement, I am satisfied that the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

The Australian Rail, Tram and Bus Industry Union (the RTBU), being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants the Agreement to cover it. In accordance with s.201(2) and based on the declaration provided by the organisation, I note that the Agreement covers the organisation.

The Agreement was approved on 19 June 2023 and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 26 June 2023. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 31 August 2025.

Variation

In conjunction with the approval application, the Employer filed a Form F1 application seeking variation of the Agreement pursuant to s.218A of the Act. The Form F1 was signed by representatives of both the Employer and the RTBU.

The variation that is sought by the parties relates to clause 40.4 of the Agreement. Specifically, they seek the correction of an error in the first row, fifth column of the table therein. It is requested that where it says, “1 September 2023”, this should be amended to “1 September 2024” (the error).

Section 218A of the Act provides:

“218A Variation of enterprise agreements to correct or amend errors, defects or irregularities

(1) The FWC may vary an enterprise agreement to correct or amend an obvious error, defect or irregularity (whether in substance or form).

(2) The FWC may vary an enterprise agreement under subsection (1):

(a)on its own initiative; or

(b)on application by any of the following:

(i)one or more of the employers covered by the agreement;

(ii)an employee covered by the agreement; or

(iii)an employee organisation covered by the agreement.

(3) If the FWC varies…

Grounds of appeal

[14] The appellant contends that the primary judge erred in finding that the respondent had discharged the onus of establishing the matters required under the relevant provision.

[15] It was submitted that his Honour failed to give adequate weight to the evidence of the second witness, and that the findings of fact were not reasonably open on the material before the Court.

[16] The respondent, for its part, submits that no error is disclosed, and that the conclusions reached were well within the range of outcomes available to the primary judge.

Consideration

[17] It is convenient to deal first with the question of construction, as the resolution of that issue informs the remaining grounds advanced by the appellant.

[18] For the reasons that follow, we are of the view that the appeal should be allowed in part and the matter remitted for further determination.

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read HV Rail Pty Limited and more:

Read every judgment in full
Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
Download judgments as PDF or Word

Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details

Case: [2023] FWCA 1776
Decision Date: 19 JUNE 2023

CaseChat Overview and Summary

HV Rail Pty Limited sought approval for the HV Rail Terminal (QLD) Enterprise Agreement 2023 in the Fair Work Commission. The application also included a request to vary the agreement to correct or amend an obvious error. The nature of the dispute was centred around the procedural fairness of the negotiation process and the correctness of the agreement terms as proposed. The Fair Work Commission was the court vested with the jurisdiction to adjudicate on these matters.

The central legal issues before the court were whether the enterprise agreement was fairly and appropriately negotiated and whether the proposed variation to correct or amend the obvious error was justified. The applicant needed to demonstrate that the negotiation process was procedurally fair and that any errors in the agreement were indeed obvious and required correction. The court had to weigh the evidence and submissions from both parties to determine if the agreement and the proposed variation met the legal standards set by the Fair Work Act.

The Fair Work Commission, after considering the evidence and submissions, concluded that the enterprise agreement was fairly negotiated and met the procedural requirements. The court found that the proposed variation to correct the obvious error was justified and necessary to ensure the agreement accurately reflected the intentions of the parties. The court approved the HV Rail Terminal (QLD) Enterprise Agreement 2023, along with the variation to correct the error, finding that both the agreement and the variation were legally sound and in the best interests of the employees and the employer.

The final orders of the court were that the HV Rail Terminal (QLD) Enterprise Agreement 2023 be approved, and that the agreement be varied to correct the obvious error as proposed by the applicant. The court's decision provided clarity and certainty for the parties involved, allowing the agreement to proceed without further procedural hurdles.

Orders