Huynh, Ex parte - Re Min for Immigration

Case

[1999] HCATrans 330

No judgment structure available for this case.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Office of the Registry
  Melbourne  No M92 of 1997

In the matter of –

An application for Writs of Prohibition, Certiorari and Mandamus against THE HONOURABLE PHILIP RUDDOCK, THE MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS

Respondent

Ex parte –

LUONG TINH HUYNH

Prosecutor

HAYNE J

(In Chambers)

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

AT MELBOURNE ON MONDAY, 11 OCTOBER 1999, AT 11.00 AM

Copyright in the High Court of Australia

MR C.L. RAWSONYour Honour, I appear for the respondent in this matter.  (instructed by the Australian Government Solicitor)

MR E.H. RODAN:   I appear on behalf of the prosecutor in this matter.  (instructed by Erskine Rodan & Associates)

MR RAWSON:   Your Honour, the parties had agreed on consent orders as late as about, I think, some time late on Friday evening and they were dispatched to the Court.  I understand that was too late and we are here this morning.  I can hand up a further copy if required, your Honour.

HIS HONOUR:   I have enough files here to start my own registry, Mr Rawson, so if you could hand up a spare copy, I would be very grateful.

MR RAWSON:   That is a copy of the minute signed by both parties and a draft copy of the order, as I understand it, your Honour.

HIS HONOUR:   Thank you.  It is in effect terminating the whole proceeding, is it not?

MR RAWSON:   Yes, your Honour.

HIS HONOUR:   Thank you.  You are content, are you, Mr Rodan, that there are orders by consent that the applications for writs of prohibition, certiorari and mandamus are dismissed, with each party bearing its own costs.

MR RODAN:   Yes, your Honour.

HIS HONOUR:   There will be orders in those terms.  Thank you for coming, gentlemen.

AT 11.01 AM THE MATTER WAS CONCLUDED

Areas of Law

  • Administrative Law

  • Immigration

Legal Concepts

  • Judicial Review

  • Jurisdiction

  • Procedural Fairness

  • Natural Justice

  • Standing

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0