FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hutchinson v Comcare [2017] FCA 1145
File number: WAD 404 of 2016 Judge: BROMBERG J Date of judgment: 13 September 2017 Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for interlocutory relief: compensation for reprisals made under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 2013 (Cth) – where reprisals said to comprise late payment of reimbursements for medical expenses – whether a prima facie case is made out – no connection established between late payments and putative public interest disclosures – application dismissed Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 23
Public Interest Disclosure Act 2013 (Cth) ss 13, 14, 15
Safety, Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 (Cth)
Date of hearing: 13 September 2017 Registry: Western Australia Division: Fair Work Division National Practice Area: Employment & Industrial Relations Category: Catchwords Number of paragraphs: 18 Counsel for the Applicant: The applicant is self-represented and appeared by telephone Counsel for the Respondent: Ms R Sweet Solicitor for the Respondent: Norton Rose Fulbright ORDERS
WAD 404 of 2016 BETWEEN: KAREN HUTCHINSON
Applicant
AND: COMCARE
Respondent
JUDGE:
BROMBERG J
DATE OF ORDER:
13 SEPTEMBER 2017
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The applicant’s interlocutory application filed 5 May 2017 is dismissed.
2.The applicant pay the respondent’s costs of that application.
3.On or before 25 October 2017 the applicant file and serve:
(i)A document indicating the affidavits already filed in the proceeding on which she intends to rely at trial.
(ii)Any further affidavits on which she intends to rely at trial.
(iii)Written submissions in support of the claims made which particularise the evidence relied upon for each of those claims.
4.The proceeding be referred to mediation before a Registrar of the Court on a date to be fixed on or after 30 October 2017 and before 17 November 2017.
5.On or before 14 February 2018 the respondent file and serve
(i)A document indicating the affidavits already filed in the proceeding on which it intends to rely at trial.
(ii)Any further affidavits on which it intends to rely at trial.
(iii)Written submissions responding to the claims made by the applicant, including by particularising the evidence relied upon in response to each claim.
6.On or before 14 March 2018 the applicant file and serve any affidavits in reply upon which she intends to rely together with any written submissions in reply.
7.The affidavits and written submissions filed and relied upon by the parties shall stand as the pleadings.
8.The proceeding be listed for a pre-trial conference at 9.30am on 28 March 2018.
9.The proceeding be listed for trial on an estimate of 7 days on a date to be fixed.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
BROMBERG J:
In her originating application, the applicant, Karen Hutchinson (“Ms Hutchinson”), seeks various forms of relief, including relief pursuant to s 14 of the Public Interest Disclosure Act 2013 (Cth) (“PID Act”). Section 14 of the PID Act permits the Court if…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Hutchinson v Comcare and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2017] FCA 1145
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine whether Hutchinson had made out a prima facie case for reprisals under the Act. Specifically, the court needed to assess if there was a connection between Hutchinson's public interest disclosures and the alleged delayed payments of her medical reimbursements. Hutchinson argued that the timing of the late payments correlated with her disclosures, whereas Comcare contended that the delays were due to administrative errors and not related to the disclosures.
In dismissing Hutchinson's application, the court found that there was no sufficient connection established between the late payments and Hutchinson's public interest disclosures. The court reasoned that Hutchinson had not demonstrated a causal link between the reprisals and the disclosures as required by the Act. Consequently, the court held that Hutchinson had not made out a prima facie case for reprisals.
The court ordered that Hutchinson's interlocutory application be dismissed, and she was directed to pay Comcare's costs of the application. The court also outlined a detailed schedule for the preparation and exchange of evidence and submissions ahead of mediation and trial, including deadlines for filing affidavits and written submissions, referring the matter to mediation, and scheduling a pre-trial conference and trial.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The applicant’s interlocutory application filed 5 May 2017 is dismissed.
2. The applicant pay the respondent’s costs of that application.
3. On or before 25 October 2017 the applicant file and serve:
(i) A document indicating the affidavits already filed in the proceeding on which she intends to rely at trial.
(ii) Any further affidavits on which she intends to rely at trial.
(iii) Written submissions in support of the claims made which particularise the evidence relied upon for each of those claims.
4. The proceeding be referred to mediation before a Registrar of the Court on a date to be fixed on or after 30 October 2017 and before 17 November 2017.
5. On or before 14 February 2018 the respondent file and serve
(i) A document indicating the affidavits already filed in the proceeding on which it intends to rely at trial.
(ii) Any further affidavits on which it intends to rely at trial.
(iii) Written submissions responding to the claims made by the applicant, including by particularising the evidence relied upon in response to each claim.
6. On or before 14 March 2018 the applicant file and serve any affidavits in reply upon which she intends to rely together with any written submissions in reply.
7. The affidavits and written submissions filed and relied upon by the parties shall stand as the pleadings.
8. The proceeding be listed for a pre-trial conference at 9.30am on 28 March 2018.
9. The proceeding be listed for trial on an estimate of 7 days on a date to be fixed.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.