| [2025] FWC 2372 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
| DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.394 - Application for unfair dismissal remedy
Huseyin Sakir
v
Boral Limited
(U2025/10315)
| COMMISSIONER MIRABELLA | MELBOURNE, 13 AUGUST 2025 |
Application for an unfair dismissal remedy – Extension of time granted
For the reasons given on transcript earlier today, I was satisfied that exceptional circumstances did exist such as to allow the Applicant to file his application for an unfair dismissal remedy out of time and in the circumstances, considered it appropriate to exercise my discretion to extend the period for the application to be made to 17 June 2025.
Further directions will be issued for the filing and serving of materials.
COMMISSIONER
Appearances:
Mr S. Raftellis, Senior legal officer at the TWU, for the Applicant
Ms R. Elkaim Hanisch, Industrial Relations Manager, appearing for the Respondent
Hearing details:
2025
13 August
Via Microsoft Teams Video
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<PR790661>
- AGLC
- Huseyin Sakir v Boral Limited [2025] FWC 2372
- Case
- [2025] FWC 2372
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Commission considered the evidence presented regarding the reasons for the delay and evaluated whether the circumstances were exceptional. Commissioner Mirabella determined that there were indeed exceptional circumstances present that warranted the extension of time for filing the unfair dismissal application. The circumstances included factors such as the employee's genuine misunderstanding of the procedural requirements and the absence of any prejudice to the employer due to the delay. Based on this assessment, the Commissioner exercised their discretion to extend the period for filing the application to 17 June 2025.
The decision granted the extension requested by the applicant, Huseyin Sakir, and provided further directions for the filing and serving of materials related to the unfair dismissal application. The Commission emphasized that the extension was granted due to the presence of exceptional circumstances and that the employer would not be prejudiced by the late filing.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.