Humphrey & Humphrey (No 4)

Case [2024] FedCFamC1F 845


FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

(DIVISION 1)

Humphrey & Humphrey (No 4) [2024] FedCFamC1F 845  

File number(s): BRC 4211 of 2019
Judgment of: HOWARD J
Date of judgment: 26 November 2024
Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – CONTRAVENTION – personal service – overarching purpose of the rules – power to dispense with the rules  
Legislation: Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021
Cases: Doyle v Commonwealth (1985) 156 CLR 510
Division: Division 1 First Instance
Number of paragraphs: 8
Date of hearing: 26 November 2024
Place: Brisbane
Counsel for the applicant: Mr Matthews of Kings Counsel
Solicitor for the applicant: Evans Brandon Family Lawyers
Counsel for the respondent: Mr Christie
Solicitor for the respondent: Murdoch Lawyers

ORDERS

BRC 4211 of 2019

FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA (DIVISION 1)

BETWEEN:

MS HUMPHREY
Applicant

AND:

MR HUMPHREY
Respondent

ORDER MADE BY:

HOWARD J

DATE OF ORDER:

26 NOVEMBER 2024

THE COURT ORDERS UNTIL FURTHER ORDER:

1.That the Final Contravention Hearing be adjourned to a Case Management Hearing at 10.00am on 5 December 2024 with the parties and their representatives having leave to appear by telephone.

Subpoena Orders

2.That the parties have leave (and the Court make the necessary arrangements for the parties to be able) to rely upon and to seek to tender documents produced under Subpoena within the concurrent parenting proceedings between Mr Humphrey (the Father) and Ms Humphrey (the Mother) under BRC1951/2024 at the Final Contravention Hearing listed before the Honourable Justice Howard (under BRC4211/2019).

3.That the Court make the necessary arrangements to facilitate the playing of CCTV footage produced under subpoena at the Final Contravention Hearing.

4.That the parties’ legal representatives have leave to inspect and copy the documents produced in response to Subpoena No. 7 under BRC1951/1024 (being the Subpoena to Department of Child Safety, Seniors and Disability Services dated 15 October 2024).

5.That the parties be and are hereby restrained from using, or disseminating the documents produced under the subpoenas in any way other than the purpose outlined in the preceding Order.

Transcript

6.That the Mother have leave to provide a hard copy of the Transcript of the Interim Hearing before the Honourable Justice Jarrett on 25 July 2024 under BRC4211/2019 to the Father and his legal representatives.

Costs

7.That each parties’ costs be reserved.

THE COURT NOTES:

A.That the Court is considering listing the Final Contravention Hearing for 3 days commencing Tuesday 10 December 2024.

Note:   The form of the order is subject to the entry in the Court’s records.

Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 10.14(b) Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 10.13 Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth).

Part XIVB of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) makes it an offence, except in very limited circumstances, to publish an…

Continue reading Humphrey & Humphrey (No 4)

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Humphrey & Humphrey (No 4) [2024] FedCFamC1F 845
Case
[2024] FedCFamC1F 845
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Ms Humphrey, the applicant, and Mr Humphrey, the respondent, were before the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia, Division 1, in proceedings relating to contraventions under family law. The court was tasked with managing the procedural aspects of the case, specifically focusing on the service of documents and the use of evidence in the final contravention hearing. The court also had to consider the overarching purpose of the rules and the power to dispense with certain procedural requirements where necessary.

The legal issues before the court involved the proper service of documents, the admissibility of evidence obtained under subpoena in concurrent parenting proceedings, and the appropriate use of CCTV footage in the final contravention hearing. The court had to determine whether the evidence should be admissible and how it should be presented, while also considering the overarching purpose of the family law rules and the need to ensure fair and just proceedings.

In addressing these issues, the court found that the parties should be permitted to rely on and use documents produced under subpoena in the concurrent parenting proceedings. The court also decided that the parties should be allowed to tender CCTV footage and that the legal representatives should have access to inspect and copy specific documents. The court emphasised the importance of adhering to the purpose of the rules and the need to avoid unnecessary duplication of proceedings. The court adjourned the final contravention hearing to allow for a case management hearing and made several orders to facilitate the use of evidence in the final hearing.

The court made specific orders regarding the use of documents and evidence in the final contravention hearing, including allowing the parties to use documents produced in concurrent proceedings and making arrangements for the presentation of CCTV footage. The court also restrained the parties from using the documents for any purpose other than the final hearing. The court reserved costs for both parties.

Orders

Orders of the court

BRC 4211 of 2019

FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA (DIVISION 1)

BETWEEN:

MS HUMPHREY

Applicant

AND:

MR HUMPHREY

Respondent

ORDER MADE BY:

HOWARD J

DATE OF ORDER:

26 NOVEMBER 2024

THE COURT ORDERS UNTIL FURTHER ORDER:

1. That the Final Contravention Hearing be adjourned to a Case Management Hearing at 10.00am on 5 December 2024 with the parties and their representatives having leave to appear by telephone.

Subpoena Orders

2. That the parties have leave (and the Court make the necessary arrangements for the parties to be able) to rely upon and to seek to tender documents produced under Subpoena within the concurrent parenting proceedings between Mr Humphrey (the Father) and Ms Humphrey (the Mother) under BRC1951/2024 at the Final Contravention Hearing listed before the Honourable Justice Howard (under BRC4211/2019).

3. That the Court make the necessary arrangements to facilitate the playing of CCTV footage produced under subpoena at the Final Contravention Hearing.

4. That the parties’ legal representatives have leave to inspect and copy the documents produced in response to Subpoena No. 7 under BRC1951/1024 (being the Subpoena to Department of Child Safety, Seniors and Disability Services dated 15 October 2024).

5. That the parties be and are hereby restrained from using, or disseminating the documents produced under the subpoenas in any way other than the purpose outlined in the preceding Order.

Transcript

6. That the Mother have leave to provide a hard copy of the Transcript of the Interim Hearing before the Honourable Justice Jarrett on 25 July 2024 under BRC4211/2019 to the Father and his legal representatives.

Costs

7. That each parties’ costs be reserved.

THE COURT NOTES:

A. That the Court is considering listing the Final Contravention Hearing for 3 days commencing Tuesday 10 December 2024.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry in the Court’s records.

Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 10.14(b) Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 10.13 Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth).

Part XIVB of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) makes it an offence, except in very limited circumstances, to publish an account of proceedings that identify persons, associated persons, or witnesses involved in family law proceedings.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.