FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| HUGHES & OLIVER | [2020] FamCA 318 |
| FAMILY LAW – COSTS – Application for costs by the husband – Where the wife was wholly unsuccessful – Where the wife chose not to provide financial disclosure – Where the husband made two genuine offers in attempt to resolve the matter – Where there is no evidence of a response to either offer – Where there are exceptional circumstances – Costs application granted from the date of the first offer and in respect of certain court events on an indemnity basis as agreed, or assessed. |
| Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 117 |
| Sfakianakis & Sfakianakis [2019] FamCAFC 54 Colgate-Palmolive Co & Cussons Pty Ltd (1993) 46 FCR 225; [1993] FCA 801 |
| APPLICANT: | Mr Hughes |
| RESPONDENT: | Ms Oliver |
| FILE NUMBER: | PAC | 5262 | of | 2015 |
| DATE DELIVERED: | 4 May 2020 |
| PLACE DELIVERED: | In Chambers |
| PLACE HEARD: | Newcastle |
| JUDGMENT OF: | Cleary J |
| HEARING DATE: | Heard by way of written submissions of the Applicant |
REPRESENTATION
| COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT: | Not Applicable |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: | Brydens Lawyers |
| COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: | Not Applicable |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT: | Not Applicable |
Orders
That the wife shall pay the husband’s costs of and incidental to:
(a)The trial concluded on 24 July 2018 calculated from 28 July 2017 on an indemnity basis as agreed or assessed; and
(b)The application conducted on 16 November 2018 and 17 December 2018 to include preparation of Application and Affidavit in Support of Natalie Dadisho solicitor, on an indemnity basis as agreed or assessed.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Oliver & Hughes has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for Judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 17.02 Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth).
| FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT NEWCASTLE |
FILE NUMBER: PAC 5262 of 2015
| Mr Hughes |
Applicant
And
| Ms Oliver |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Introduction
This is an application for costs by the applicant husband arising from a trial with respect to adjustment of interests in matrimonial property. The trial was conducted in the Parramatta registry of this Court over two days in July 2018.
Orders and reasons were delivered on 14 September 2018.
On 12 October 2018 the Application in a Case (Costs) was filed by the husband supported by an Affidavit of his solicitor.
The Application was listed for 16 November 2018 at 10.00 am in the Newcastle Registry, with the parties to attend by telephone.
On that day the solicitor for the husband appeared. There was no appearance by or on behalf of the wife. At 9.26 am on that day an application by the wife…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read HUGHES & OLIVER and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2020] FamCA 318
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the Court was whether the costs should be awarded on a standard or indemnity basis, and which party should bear those costs. Specifically, the Court had to consider the circumstances surrounding the trial and the later applications to determine if there were grounds to depart from the usual order for costs to follow the event on a standard basis.
Cleary J ordered that the wife pay the husband’s costs of and incidental to the trial concluded on 24 July 2018, calculated from 28 July 2017, on an indemnity basis. Furthermore, the wife was ordered to pay the husband’s costs of the applications conducted on 16 November 2018 and 17 December 2018, including the preparation of the Application and Affidavit in Support by Natalie Dadisho solicitor, also on an indemnity basis. These costs are to be agreed or assessed.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
That the wife shall pay the husband’s costs of and incidental to:
(a) The trial concluded on 24 July 2018 calculated from 28 July 2017 on an indemnity basis as agreed or assessed; and
(b) The application conducted on 16 November 2018 and 17 December 2018 to include preparation of Application and Affidavit in Support of Natalie Dadisho solicitor, on an indemnity basis as agreed or assessed.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.