Hudson v Lee
Case
•
[1997] HCATrans 6
No judgment structure available for this case.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SITTING AS THE COURT OF
DISPUTED RETURNS
Office of the Registry
Sydney No S60 of 1993
B e t w e e n -
ROBERT JAMES NEILSON HUDSON (JNR)
Petitioner
MICHAEL JOHN LEE, MP
First Respondent
and
AUSTRALIAN ELECTORAL COMMISSION
Second Respondent
Costs Order
GAUDRON J
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
AT SYDNEY ON WEDNESDAY, 29 JANUARY 1997, AT 10.30 AM
Copyright in the High Court of Australia
HER HONOUR: There has been nothing special or unusual which would warrant any departure from the ordinary rule as to costs in this case. The costs order is thus an order for costs on a party and party basis. There will be no order with respect to the costs of this application. I publish my reasons.
AT 10.31 AM THE MATTER WAS CONCLUDED
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Negligence & Tort
Legal Concepts
-
Duty of Care
-
Negligence
-
Causation
-
Damages
-
Appeal
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Hudson v Lee [1997] HCATrans 6
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Cases Cited
0
Statutory Material Cited
0