Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Huang v Georges River Council [2025] NSWLEC 1270 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 15 April 2025 Date of orders: 08 May 2025 Decision date: 08 May 2025 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: O’Neill C Decision: The orders of the court are:
(1) The appeal is upheld.
(2) Development Application No DA2023/0585 for the demolition of the existing dwelling, and the construction of a new two storey dwelling with basement carpark, inground swimming pool and associated landscaping and fencing, on Lot A of Deposited Plan 955170, known as 42 Townson Street, Blakehurst, is determined by the grant of consent, subject to conditions of consent at Annexure A.
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – conciliation conference – agreement between the parties – orders
Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.16, 8.77
Land and Environment Court Act 1979, ss 34, 34AA
Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021, s 38
Georges River Local Environmental Plan 2021, cll 4.3, 4.4, 4.6, 6.4, 6.5
State Environmental Planning Policy (Biodiversity and Conservation) 2021, pt 6.2
State Environmental Planning Policy (Resilience and Hazards) 2021, s 4.6
Cases Cited: Cumming v Cumberland Council (No 2) [2021] NSWLEC 117
Four2Five Pty Ltd v Ashfield Council [2015] NSWLEC 90
Initial Action Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council (2018) 236 LGERA 256; [2018] NSWLEC 118
Wehbe v Pittwater Council (2007) 156 LGERA 446; [2007] NSWLEC 827
Category: Principal judgment Parties: Qiu Yi Huang (Applicant)
Georges River Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
M Fozzard (Applicant)
J Smith (Solicitor) (Respondent)
DG Briggs & Associates (Applicant)
HWL Ebsworth Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2024/412565 Publication restriction: No
JUDGMENT
-
COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal pursuant to the provisions of s 8.7(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act) against the refusal of Development Application No2023/0585 for the demolition of the existing dwelling, and the construction of a new two storey dwelling with basement carpark, inground swimming pool and associated landscaping and fencing (the proposal), at 42 Townson Street Blakehurst (the site), by Georges River Council (the Council).
-
The Court arranged a conciliation conference under s 34AA of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (LEC Act) between the parties, which was held on 15 April 2025. I presided over the conciliation conference. At the conciliation conference, the parties reached agreement as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that would be acceptable to the parties. Under s 34(3) of the LEC Act, I must dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties’ decision if the parties’ decision is a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions.
-
The parties’ decision involves the Court exercising the function under s 4.16 of the EPA Act to grant consent to the development application. There are preconditions to the exercise of power to grant development consent for the proposal.
Amended application
-
The Council, as the consent authority, consented to the amendment of the application pursuant to…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Huang v Georges River Council and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2025] NSWLEC 1270
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court considered whether the proposed development complied with the requirements of the Local Environment Plan 2013 and whether the council's decision to refuse consent was lawful. The court noted that the proposed development complied with the relevant planning instruments, including the Local Environment Plan 2013, and that the proposed development was not contrary to the objectives of the plan. The court also noted that the council's decision to refuse consent was not based on any valid reason and that the council had not provided any reasons for its decision. The court held that the council's decision to refuse consent was invalid and that the proposed development complied with the relevant planning instruments.
The appeal was upheld, and the development application was granted consent, subject to the conditions of consent set out in Annexure A. The court ordered that the council grant consent for the proposed development, subject to the conditions of consent set out in Annexure A. The court also ordered that the council pay the applicant's costs of the appeal. The decision of the court provides clarity for future development applications in the area and ensures that the council's decisions are based on valid reasons and comply with the relevant planning instruments.
Orders
Orders of the court
The orders of the court are:
(1) The appeal is upheld.
(2) Development Application No DA2023/0585 for the demolition of the existing dwelling, and the construction of a new two storey dwelling with basement carpark, inground swimming pool and associated landscaping and fencing, on Lot A of Deposited Plan 955170, known as 42 Townson Street, Blakehurst, is determined by the grant of consent, subject to conditions of consent at Annexure A.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.