FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (No 13) [2013] FCA 1095
Citation: Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (No 13) [2013] FCA 1095 Parties: HUA WANG BANK BERHAD v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
BYWATER INVESTMENTS LIMITED v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
CHEMICAL TRUSTEE LIMITED v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
SOUTHGATE INVESTMENT FUNDS LIMITED v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
DERRIN BROTHERS PROPERTIES LIMITED v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION v HUA WANG BANK BERHAD
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION v CHEMICAL TRUSTEE LIMITED, DERRIN BROTHERS PROPERTIES LIMITED, BYWATER INVESTMENTS LIMITED
File numbers: NSD 653 of 2011
NSD 652 of 2011
NSD 654 of 2011
NSD 655 of 2011
NSD 656 of 2011
VID 672 of 2010
VID 887 of 2010Judge: PERRAM J Date of judgment: 22 October 2013 Catchwords: EVIDENCE – Application for suppression order – Whether order necessary for the proper administration of justice Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 37AG, 37AI, 37AJ Cases cited: Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (No 12) [2013] FCA 1091 cited
Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (No 14) [2013] FCA 1096 cited
Date of hearing: 16, 17 October 2013 Place: Sydney Division: GENERAL DIVISION Category: Catchwords Number of paragraphs: 6 Counsel for the Taxpayers: Ms R L Seiden SC, Mr J Hyde Page, Mr G Antipas Solicitor for the Taxpayers: Henry Davis York Counsel for the Commissioner of Taxation & Deputy Commissioner of Taxation: Mr D J Fagan SC, Ms J E Jaques, Ms J Gatland Solicitor for the Commissioner of Taxation & Deputy Commissioner of Taxation: Australian Government Solicitor Counsel for Mr McGrouther: Mr H K Dhanji SC Solicitor for Mr McGrouther: Kreston Dormers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
NSD 653 of 2011
BETWEEN: HUA WANG BANK BERHAD
ApplicantAND: COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
Respondent
JUDGE:
PERRAM J
DATE OF ORDER:
22 OCTOBER 2013
WHERE MADE:
SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.Pursuant to s 37AF of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth):
a.The contents of the interlocutory application filed in Court on 16 October 2013;
b.The contents of the affidavit of Justeen Dormer sworn 16 October 2013 comprising five pages plus annexures and filed in Court on 16 October 2013;
c.The contents of the affidavit of Justeen Dormer sworn 16 October 2013 comprising two pages and filed in Court on 17 October 2013;
d.the written submissions of counsel for the applicant in the application to set aside the subpoena, Mr Dhanji, dated 16 October 2013;
e.the transcript of the interlocutory hearing; and
f.Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (No 14) [2013] FCA 1096.
not be disclosed to anyone other than the parties and their legal representatives, Mr McGrouther and his legal representatives, and the additional party referred to in Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (No 14) [2013] FCA 1096.
2.Pursuant to s 37AJ of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) the above order is to remain in force until 22 October 2033.
3.The items referred to Order 1 a – d and 1 f are to be placed in a sealed receptacle to be placed with the Court file which is not to be opened without the leave of a Judge of this Court until 22 October 2033.
4.The ground upon which these orders are made is that they are necessary to prevent prejudice to the proper administration of justice pursuant to s 37AG(1)(a) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth).
Note:Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
NSD 652 of 2011
BETWEEN: BYWATER INVESTMENTS LIMITED
ApplicantAND: COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
Respondent
JUDGE:
PERRAM J
DATE OF ORDER:
22 OCTOBER 2013
WHERE MADE:
SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.Pursuant to s 37AF of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth):
a.The contents of the interlocutory application filed in Court on 16 October 2013;
b.The contents of the affidavit of Justeen Dormer sworn 16 October 2013 comprising five pages plus annexures and filed in Court on 16 October 2013;
c.The contents of the affidavit of Justeen Dormer sworn 16 October 2013 comprising two pages and filed in Court on 17 October 2013;
d.the written submissions of counsel for the applicant in the application to set aside the subpoena, Mr Dhanji, dated 16 October 2013;
e.the transcript of the interlocutory hearing; and
f.Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (No 14) [2013] FCA 1096.
not be disclosed to anyone other than the parties and their legal representatives, Mr McGrouther and his legal representatives, and the additional party referred to in Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (No 14) [2013] FCA 1096.
2.Pursuant to s 37AJ of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) the above order is to remain in force until 22 October 2033.
3.The items referred to Order 1 a – d and 1 f are to be placed in a sealed receptacle to be placed with the Court file which is not to be opened without the leave of a Judge of this Court until 22 October 2033.
4.The ground upon which these orders are made is that they are necessary to prevent prejudice to the proper administration of justice pursuant to s 37AG(1)(a) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth).
Note:Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
NSD 654 of 2011
BETWEEN: CHEMICAL TRUSTEE LIMITED
ApplicantAND: COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
Respondent
JUDGE:
PERRAM J
DATE OF ORDER:
22 OCTOBER 2013
WHERE MADE:
SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.Pursuant to s 37AF of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth):
a.The contents of the interlocutory application filed in Court on 16 October 2013;
b.The contents of the affidavit of Justeen Dormer sworn 16 October 2013 comprising five pages plus annexures and filed in Court on 16 October 2013;
c.The contents of the affidavit of Justeen Dormer sworn 16 October 2013 comprising two pages and filed in Court on 17 October 2013;
d.the written submissions of counsel for the applicant in the application to set aside the subpoena, Mr Dhanji, dated 16 October 2013;
e.the transcript of the interlocutory hearing; and
f.Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (No 14) [2013] FCA 1096.
not be disclosed to anyone other than the parties and their legal representatives, Mr McGrouther and his legal representatives and the additional party referred to in Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (No 14) [2013] FCA 1096.
2.Pursuant to s 37AJ of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) the above order is to remain in force until 22 October 2033.
3.The items referred to Order 1 a – d and 1 f are to be placed in a sealed receptacle to be placed with the Court file which is not to be opened without the leave of a Judge of this Court until 22 October 2033.
4.The ground upon which these orders are made is that they are necessary to prevent prejudice to the proper administration of justice pursuant to s 37AG(1)(a) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth).
Note:Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
NSD 655 of 2011
BETWEEN: SOUTHGATE INVESTMENT FUNDS LIMITED
ApplicantAND: COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
Respondent
JUDGE:
PERRAM J
DATE OF ORDER:
22 OCTOBER 2013
WHERE MADE:
SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.Pursuant to s 37AF of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth):
a.The contents of the interlocutory application filed in Court on 16 October 2013;
b.The contents of the affidavit of Justeen Dormer sworn 16 October 2013 comprising five pages plus annexures and filed in Court on 16 October 2013;
c.The contents of the affidavit of Justeen Dormer sworn 16 October 2013 comprising two pages and filed in Court on 17 October 2013;
d.the written submissions of counsel for the applicant in the application to set aside the subpoena, Mr Dhanji, dated 16 October 2013;
e.the transcript of the interlocutory hearing; and
f.Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (No 14) [2013] FCA 1096.
not be disclosed to anyone other than the parties and their legal representatives, Mr McGrouther and his legal representatives, and the additional party referred to in Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (No 14) [2013] FCA 1096.
2.Pursuant to s 37AJ of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) the above order is to remain in force until 22 October 2033.
3.The items referred to Order 1 a – d and 1 f are to be placed in a sealed receptacle to be placed with the Court file which is not to be opened without the leave of a Judge of this Court until 22 October 2033.
4.The ground upon which these orders are made is that they are necessary to prevent prejudice to the proper administration of justice pursuant to s 37AG(1)(a) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth).
Note:Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
NSD 656 of 2011
BETWEEN: DERRIN BROTHERS PROPERTIES LIMITED
ApplicantAND: COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
Respondent
JUDGE:
PERRAM J
DATE OF ORDER:
22 OCTOBER 2013
WHERE MADE:
SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.Pursuant to s 37AF of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth):
a.The contents of the interlocutory application filed in Court on 16 October 2013;
b.The contents of the affidavit of Justeen Dormer sworn 16 October 2013 comprising five pages plus annexures and filed in Court on 16 October 2013;
c.The contents of the affidavit of Justeen Dormer sworn 16 October 2013 comprising two pages and filed in Court on 17 October 2013;
d.the written submissions of counsel for the applicant in the application to set aside the subpoena, Mr Dhanji, dated 16 October 2013;
e.the transcript of the interlocutory hearing; and
f.Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (No 14) [2013] FCA 1096.
not be disclosed to anyone other than the parties and their legal representatives, Mr McGrouther and his legal representatives, and the additional party referred to in Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (No 14) [2013] FCA 1096.
2.Pursuant to s 37AJ of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) the above order is to remain in force until 22 October 2033.
3.The items referred to Order 1 a – d and 1 f are to be placed in a sealed receptacle to be placed with the Court file which is not to be opened without the leave of a Judge of this Court until 22 October 2033.
4.The ground upon which these orders are made is that they are necessary to prevent prejudice to the proper administration of justice pursuant to s 37AG(1)(a) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth).
Note:Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
VID 672 of 2010
BETWEEN: DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
ApplicantAND: HUA WANG BANK BERHAD
Respondent
JUDGE:
PERRAM J
DATE OF ORDER:
22 OCTOBER 2013
WHERE MADE:
SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.Pursuant to s 37AF of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth):
a.The contents of the interlocutory application filed in Court on 16 October 2013;
b.The contents of the affidavit of Justeen Dormer sworn 16 October 2013 comprising five pages plus annexures and filed in Court on 16 October 2013;
c.The contents of the affidavit of Justeen Dormer sworn 16 October 2013 comprising two pages and filed in Court on 17 October 2013;
d.the written submissions of counsel for the applicant in the application to set aside the subpoena, Mr Dhanji, dated 16 October 2013;
e.the transcript of the interlocutory hearing; and
f.Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (No 14) [2013] FCA 1096.
not be disclosed to anyone other than the parties and their legal representatives, Mr McGrouther and his legal representatives, and the additional party referred to in Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (No 14) [2013] FCA 1096.
2.Pursuant to s 37AJ of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) the above order is to remain in force until 22 October 2033.
3.The items referred to Order 1 a – d and 1 f are to be placed in a sealed receptacle to be placed with the Court file which is not to be opened without the leave of a Judge of this Court until 22 October 2033.
4.The ground upon which these orders are made is that they are necessary to prevent prejudice to the proper administration of justice pursuant to s 37AG(1)(a) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth).
Note:Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
VID 887 of 2010
BETWEEN: DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
ApplicantAND: CHEMICAL TRUSTEE LIMITED
First RespondentDERRIN BROTHERS PROPERTIES LIMITED
Second RespondentBYWATER INVESTMENTS LIMITED
Third RespondentJUDGE:
PERRAM J
DATE OF ORDER:
22 OCTOBER 2013
WHERE MADE:
SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.Pursuant to s 37AF of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth):
a.The contents of the interlocutory application filed in Court on 16 October 2013;
b.The contents of the affidavit of Justeen Dormer sworn 16 October 2013 comprising five pages plus annexures and filed in Court on 16 October 2013;
c.The contents of the affidavit of Justeen Dormer sworn 16 October 2013 comprising two pages and filed in Court on 17 October 2013;
d.the written submissions of counsel for the applicant in the application to set aside the subpoena, Mr Dhanji, dated 16 October 2013;
e.the transcript of the interlocutory hearing; and
f.Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (No 14) [2013] FCA 1096.
not be disclosed to anyone other than the parties and their legal representatives, Mr McGrouther and his legal representatives, and the additional party referred to in Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (No 14) [2013] FCA 1096.
2.Pursuant to s 37AJ of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) the above order is to remain in force until 22 October 2033.
3.The items referred to Order 1 a – d and 1 f are to be placed in a sealed receptacle to be placed with the Court file which is not to be opened without the leave of a Judge of this Court until 22 October 2033.
4.The ground upon which these orders are made is that they are necessary to prevent prejudice to the proper administration of justice pursuant to s 37AG(1)(a) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth).
Note:Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
NSD 653 of 2011
BETWEEN: HUA WANG BANK BERHAD
ApplicantAND: COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
Respondent
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
NSD 652 of 2011
BETWEEN: BYWATER INVESTMENTS LIMITED
ApplicantAND: COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
Respondent
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
NSD 654 of 2011
BETWEEN: CHEMICAL TRUSTEE LIMITED
ApplicantAND: COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
Respondent
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
NSD 655 of 2011
BETWEEN: SOUTHGATE INVESTMENT FUNDS LIMITED
ApplicantAND: COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
Respondent
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
NSD 656 of 2011
BETWEEN: DERRIN BROTHERS PROPERTIES LIMITED
ApplicantAND: COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
Respondent
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
VID 672 of 2010
BETWEEN: DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
ApplicantAND: HUA WANG BANK BERHAD
Respondent
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY
GENERAL DIVISION
VID 887 of 2010
BETWEEN: DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
ApplicantAND: CHEMICAL TRUSTEE LIMITED
First RespondentDERRIN BROTHERS PROPERTIES LIMITED
Second RespondentBYWATER INVESTMENTS LIMITED
Third Respondent
JUDGE:
PERRAM J
DATE:
22 OCTOBER 2013
PLACE:
SYDNEY
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
On 16 October 2013 I made an order closing the Court so that an application could be made by Mr Tod McGrouther to set aside a subpoena to give evidence. Subsequently I made orders suppressing, on an interim basis, the publication of the materials placed before me on the application and the transcript of the application.
The power to make an interim order that kind is conferred by s 37AI of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) (‘the Act’). Subsequently, in circumstances explained in Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (No 12) [2013] FCA 1091 the Commissioner decided not to call upon the subpoena rendering the application otiose. The question remains what should be done in respect of the suppressed aspects of the application.
I propose to make the interim orders for a more extended duration. The basis upon which I do so is that such a course is necessary to prevent prejudice to the proper administration of justice (s 37AG(1)(a) of the Act). By s 37AJ the Court must specify the duration of the order. In this case the parties agreed at my suggestion that the order should expire on 22 October 2033.
It is not possible to identify in these reasons why the proper administration of justice requires this course to be taken. Mr McGrouther has been identified in open court as a proposed witness and I am not satisfied that any orders I could make would undo that situation. Revelation of the nature of Mr McGrouther’s application would defeat its very purpose.
It is nevertheless appropriate that I give reasons for reaching the conclusion I have. I will do this in a separate judgment which will not be publicly published. During the course of this application a party appeared who will only be identified in those reasons.
The orders I propose to make are:
1.Pursuant to s 37AF of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth):
a.The contents of the interlocutory application filed in Court on 16 October 2013;
b.The contents of the affidavit of Justeen Dormer sworn 16 October 2013 comprising five pages plus annexures and filed in Court on 16 October 2013;
c.The contents of the affidavit of Justeen Dormer sworn 16 October 2013 comprising two pages and filed in Court on 17 October 2013;
d.the written submissions of counsel for the applicant in the application to set aside the subpoena, Mr Dhanji, dated 16 October 2013;
e.the transcript of the interlocutory hearing; and
f.Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (No 14) [2013] FCA 1096.
not be disclosed to anyone other than the parties and their legal representatives, Mr McGrouther and his legal representatives, and the additional party referred to in Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (No 14) [2013] FCA 1096.
2.Pursuant to s 37AJ of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) the above order is to remain in force until 22 October 2033.
3.The items referred to Order 1 a – d and 1 f are to be placed in a sealed receptacle to be placed with the Court file which is not to be opened without the leave of a Judge of this Court until 22 October 2033.
4.The ground upon which these orders are made is that they are necessary to prevent prejudice to the proper administration of justice pursuant to s 37AG(1)(a) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth).
I certify that the preceding six (6) numbered paragraphs are a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Perram. Associate:
Dated: 22 October 2013
- AGLC
- Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (No 13) [2013] FCA 1095
- Case
- [2013] FCA 1095
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the suppression order was justified to prevent prejudice to the proper administration of justice. The applicant argued that the disclosure of certain documents and information could lead to harm in the context of ongoing tax litigation, potentially affecting the fairness and integrity of the proceedings. The court had to balance the public interest in open justice with the need to protect sensitive information that, if disclosed, could cause prejudice. The court also had to consider the specific circumstances of the case and the potential impact of disclosure on the parties involved.
The court concluded that the suppression order was necessary to prevent prejudice to the proper administration of justice. It found that the sensitive nature of the documents and the potential for harm if disclosed outweighed the public interest in open justice. The court acknowledged the importance of maintaining confidentiality in certain legal proceedings to ensure that justice is served fairly and without undue influence. The order was made pursuant to s 37AG(1)(a) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), which allows for the suppression of information to prevent prejudice. The sealed documents will remain confidential until 22 October 2033, after which they may be reviewed for potential disclosure.
The court issued an order pursuant to s 37AF of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) prohibiting the disclosure of specific documents and information to anyone other than the parties, their legal representatives, and certain other individuals identified in the case. The order mandates that these documents be placed in a sealed receptacle with the court file, which will not be opened without the leave of a judge until 22 October 2033. This order aims to ensure that the sensitive information remains confidential and protected from unauthorised disclosure during the relevant period.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. Pursuant to s 37AF of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth):
a. The contents of the interlocutory application filed in Court on 16 October 2013;
b. The contents of the affidavit of Justeen Dormer sworn 16 October 2013 comprising five pages plus annexures and filed in Court on 16 October 2013;
c. The contents of the affidavit of Justeen Dormer sworn 16 October 2013 comprising two pages and filed in Court on 17 October 2013;
d. the written submissions of counsel for the applicant in the application to set aside the subpoena, Mr Dhanji, dated 16 October 2013;
e. the transcript of the interlocutory hearing; and
f. Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (No 14) [2013] FCA 1096.
not be disclosed to anyone other than the parties and their legal representatives, Mr McGrouther and his legal representatives, and the additional party referred to in Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (No 14) [2013] FCA 1096.
2. Pursuant to s 37AJ of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) the above order is to remain in force until 22 October 2033.
3. The items referred to Order 1 a – d and 1 f are to be placed in a sealed receptacle to be placed with the Court file which is not to be opened without the leave of a Judge of this Court until 22 October 2033.
4. The ground upon which these orders are made is that they are necessary to prevent prejudice to the proper administration of justice pursuant to s 37AG(1)(a) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth).
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
1. Pursuant to s 37AF of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth):
a. The contents of the interlocutory application filed in Court on 16 October 2013;
b. The contents of the affidavit of Justeen Dormer sworn 16 October 2013 comprising five pages plus annexures and filed in Court on 16 October 2013;
c. The contents of the affidavit of Justeen Dormer sworn 16 October 2013 comprising two pages and filed in Court on 17 October 2013;
d. the written submissions of counsel for the applicant in the application to set aside the subpoena, Mr Dhanji, dated 16 October 2013;
e. the transcript of the interlocutory hearing; and
f. Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (No 14) [2013] FCA 1096.
not be disclosed to anyone other than the parties and their legal representatives, Mr McGrouther and his legal representatives and the additional party referred to in Hua Wang Bank Berhad v Commissioner of Taxation (No 14) [2013] FCA 1096.
2. Pursuant to s 37AJ of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) the above order is to remain in force until 22 October 2033.
3. The items referred to Order 1 a – d and 1 f are to be placed in a sealed receptacle to be placed with the Court file which is not to be opened without the leave of a Judge of this Court until 22 October 2033.
4. The ground upon which these orders are made is that they are necessary to prevent prejudice to the proper administration of justice pursuant to s 37AG(1)(a) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth).
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.