HSH Group Pty Ltd v Ku-ring-gai Municipal Council

[2017] NSWLEC 1263

Land and Environment Court

New South Wales

• Amendment notes

Medium Neutral Citation:	HSH Group Pty Ltd v Ku-ring-gai Municipal Council [2017] NSWLEC 1263
Hearing dates:	Conciliation Conference 24 April 2017
Date of orders:	26 May 2017
Decision date:	26 May 2017
Jurisdiction:	Class 1
Before:	Dickson C
Decision:	See (5) below
Catchwords:	DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: appeal against deemed refusal of residential flat building - conciliation conference - agreement between the parties - orders
Legislation Cited:	Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:	Principal judgment
Parties:	HSH Group Pty Ltd (Applicant) Ku-ring-gai Municipal Council (Respondent)
Representation:	Ms E Flemming, Swaab Attorneys (Applicant) Mr J Hones, Hones Lawyers Pty Ltd (Respondent)
File Number(s):	2016/ 376956
Publication restriction:	No

Judgment

1. COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal, under s97(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, against the refusal of Development Application No. DA/468/16 which sought consent for demolition of existing structures and construction of a 30 unit residential flat building over basement carparking on land at 2-6 Pearson Avenue Gordon.

2. In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

3. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

4. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

5. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:

1. The appeal is upheld.

2. The Applicant is granted leave to rely on the amended plans referred to in Condition 1 of the conditions of consent contained in Annexure A.

3. The Applicant's cl.4.6 variation request is upheld.

4. The Applicant is to pay the Respondent's costs under s.97B of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, agreed in the sum of $5500.00 to be paid prior to the execution of this Agreement.

5. Development Application No. DA0468/16 is approved for the consolidation of three (3) allotments (Lots B and D in DP316799 and Lot B in DP323231), the demolition of the existing dwelling houses and associated site structures and the construction of a residential flat building consisting of thirty (30) units with basement car parking, including ancillary storm water and public domain landscaping works, and tree removal within and adjoining the proposed public roads, on land known as 2-6 Pearson Avenue, Gordon, subject to the conditions at Annexure A.

…………….

D M Dickson

Commissioner of the Court

376956.16 Dickson - Amended Condition (365 KB, pdf)

376956.16 Dickson-Plans (0 Byte, pdf)

Amendments

08 June 2017 - 'Conciliation Conference' entered

20 June 2017 - Amended Conditions attached - Slip Rule

Decision last updated: 20 June 2017