Horleck and Horleck and Ors (No 2)

In *Horleck and Horleck and Ors (No 2)*, Forrest J of the Supreme Court of Victoria considered applications made by the second, third, and fourth respondents concerning substantive proceedings. The primary dispute revolved around an application to adjourn the trial of these substantive proceedings, which was scheduled for 2 September 2012.

The central legal issue before the Court was whether the trial of the substantive proceedings should be adjourned from its scheduled date. The applications filed by the respondents sought this adjournment, along with other relief.

Forrest J dismissed all applications made by the second, third, and fourth respondents, with the sole exception of the application to adjourn the trial. This indicates that the Court found no merit in the other requests made by those parties.

Consequently, the Court ordered that save for the application to adjourn the trial of the substantive proceedings from 2 September 2012 to a later date, all other applications contained in the Application in a Case filed on 13 April 2012 on behalf of the second, third and fourth respondents were dismissed.