Hopkins v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs

Case •

[2020] FCAFC 36

•

6 March 2020

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Hopkins v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCAFC 36

File numbers: NSD 108 of 2020
NSD 109 of 2020
Judges: LOGAN, WIGNEY AND GLEESON JJ
Date of judgment: 6 March 2020
Cases cited: Hopkins v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCAFC 33
Date of hearing: 12 February 2020
Registry: New South Wales
Division: General Division
National Practice Area: Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 1
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr O Jones
Solicitor for the Applicant: Adrian Joel & Co Solicitors
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr P Knowles with Ms S Danne
Solicitor for the Respondent: Sparke Helmore

ORDERS

NSD 108 of 2020
BETWEEN:

ANTHONY MARK HOPKINS

Applicant
AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION, CITIZENSHIP, MIGRANT SERVICES AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS

Respondent

JUDGES:

LOGAN, WIGNEY AND GLEESON JJ

DATE OF ORDER:

6 MARCH 2020

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.The application be dismissed.

2.The applicant pay the respondent’s costs of and incidental to the application, as fixed by the Registrar if not agreed.

Note:   Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.


ORDERS

NSD 109 of 2020
BETWEEN:

JAMES THOMAS FERREIRA

Applicant
AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION, CITIZENSHIP, MIGRANT SERVICES AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS

Respondent

JUDGES:

LOGAN, WIGNEY AND GLEESON JJ

DATE OF ORDER:

6 MARCH 2020

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.The application be dismissed.

2.The applicant pay the respondent’s costs of and incidental to the application, as fixed by the Registrar if not agreed.

Note:   Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.


REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

THE COURT:

  1. For the reasons given in Hopkins v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCAFC 33 these two applications must be dismissed with costs.

I certify that the preceding one (1) numbered paragraph is a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justices Logan, Wigney and Gleeson.

Associate:       

Dated:       6 March 2020

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document
Cases Citing This Decision

0