Honey v RB & H Sheridan as the trustee for Robert Sheridan Family Trust
[2024] NSWPICPD 49
•19 August 2024
| DECISION OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE PERSONAL INJURY COMMISSION | |
CITATION: | Honey v RB & H Sheridan as the trustee for Robert Sheridan Family Trust [2024] NSWPICPD 49 |
APPLICANT: | Bevan Honey |
RESPONDENT: | RB & H Sheridan as the trustee for Robert Sheridan Family Trust |
INSURER: | Employers Mutual NSW Limited |
FILE NUMBER: | W8317/23 |
PRESIDENTIAL MEMBER: | President Judge Phillips |
DATE OF DECISION ON REMITTER: | 19 August 2024 |
ORDERS MADE ON REMITTER: | 1. The Certificate of Determination dated 31 January 2024 is revoked. 2. The matter remitted to the Division Head, Workers Compensation Division, for allocation to a member. |
CATCHWORDS: | WORKERS COMPENSATION – remittal from the District Court – Application to District Court under s 26 of the Personal Injury Commission Act 2020 – applications to the Personal Injury Commission for workers compensation where the parties are residents of different States; and where respondent is the State of New South Wales for the purposes of s 75(iv) of the Constitution (Cth) and the applicant is resident of another State – whether Personal Injury Commission would be exercising federal jurisdiction when determining issues under sections 4, 9, 9A, 11A, 14, 25, 26, 32A, 33, 36, 37, 38, 59, 60 and 66 of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 and s 4 of the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998 |
DATE OF MEMBER’S DECISION: | 31 January 2024 |
DECISION OF: | Principal Member J Harris |
DATE OF DISTRICT COURT DECISION: | 7 August 2024 |
INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the Personal Injury Commission (the Commission) pursuant to an order for remitter made by the District Court in Ramsay v Southern NSW Local Health District; Manning v Sydney Trains; Honey v Robert Sheridan Family Trust; Duncan v Department of Education; Magnan v Upper Shire Council [2024] NSWDC 326 (the judgment).
BACKGROUND
The applicant brought a claim against his employer, RB & H Sheridan ATF Robert Sheridan Family Trust, alleging he sustained injury to his right shoulder and elbow during the course of his employment. The applicant claimed weekly benefits compensation and medical expenses pursuant to ss 33 and 60 of the Workers Compensation Act1987 (the 1987 Act).
The respondent disputed the claim. The issues in dispute between the parties concerned ss 4, 33, and 60 of the 1987 Act.
Mr Honey was a resident of Victoria when he commenced proceedings in the Commission. His employer was RB & H Sheridan ATF Robert Sheridan Family Trust. The parties agree that the trustees and beneficiaries of the trust are Robert and Helen Sheridan who live in New South Wales and that the trust was established exclusively for the operation of their farm, which operates in New South Wales.
On 31 January 2024, following conciliation, and with the consent of the parties, the Principal Member dismissed the application. The basis for the dismissal was that it was arguable that the determination of the matter by the Commission may involve an exercise of federal jurisdiction because it is between the State and a resident of another State.
Pursuant to s 26 of Div 3.2 of the Personal Injury Commission Act 2020 (the 2020 Act) the applicant brought an application in the District Court of NSW.
Section 26(5) of the 2020 Act provides that the District Court may remit a compensation matter application for determination by the usual decision-maker if the Court is satisfied that the usual decision-maker has jurisdiction to determine it, and do so instead of granting leave or after granting leave.
The matter was heard on 4 April 2024, along with four other matters which the Commission had also declined to determine because they may involve the exercise of federal jurisdiction.
THE DECISION OF THE DISTRICT COURT OF NSW
The District Court found that in determining the issues raised by the parties under ss 4, 33, and 60 of the 1987 Act, the Commission would not be exercising judicial power, but instead administrative power (judgement at [135]).
ORDERS ON REMITTER
It is necessary that appropriate orders be made in compliance with the judgment and orders of the District Court, the effect of which is to set aside the Certificate of Determination issued by Principal Member Harris dated 31 January 2024.
DECISION
The Certificate of Determination dated 31 January 2024 is revoked.
The matter remitted to the Division Head, Workers Compensation Division, for allocation to a member.
Judge Phillips
PRESIDENT
19 August 2024
0
1
0