Legal Research
Cases
Holten v Fehsenfeld (Ruling)

Holten v Fehsenfeld (Ruling)

Case [2021] VCC 404

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Holten v Fehsenfeld (Ruling) [2021] VCC 404
Case: [2021] VCC 404
Decision Date: 15 April 2021

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Holten v Fehsenfeld (Ruling) [2021] VCC 404

Cases Citing This Decision

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Trkulja v Google LLC [2018] HCA 25
Citation 1

…ited: Dey v Victorian Railways Commissioners (1949) 78 CLR 62; Takemoto v Moody’s Investors Service Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 1081; Trkulja v Google LLC (2018) 263 CLR 149; Dank v Whittaker (No 1) [2013] NSWSC 1062; Webb v Bloch (1928) 41 CLR 331; Thiess v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd (No 5) [1994] 1 Qd R 156; Parkes v Prescott…
Takemoto v Moody's Investors Service Pty Limited [2014] FCA 1081
Citation 2

…Rules 2018, r23.02; r13.11(1) Cases Cited: Dey v Victorian Railways Commissioners (1949) 78 CLR 62; Takemoto v Moody’s Investors Service Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 1081; Trkulja v Google LLC (2018) 263 CLR 149; Dank v Whittaker (No 1) [2013] NSWSC 1062; Webb v Bloch (1928) 41 CLR 331; Thiess v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd (N…
Dank v Whittaker (No 1) [2013] NSWSC 1062
Citation 3

…(1949) 78 CLR 62; Takemoto v Moody’s Investors Service Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 1081; Trkulja v Google LLC (2018) 263 CLR 149; Dank v Whittaker (No 1) [2013] NSWSC 1062; Webb v Bloch (1928) 41 CLR 331; Thiess v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd (No 5) [1994] 1 Qd R 156; Parkes v Prescott (1869) LR 4 Ex 169; Rowson & Anor v Alpass…
Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Obeid [2006] NSWCA 231
Citation 4

…owson & Anor v Alpass (2017) 53 VR 196; John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd v Rivkin (2003) 201 ALR 77; Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Obeid [2006] NSWCA 231 Ruling:Paragraph 6D of Proposed Further Amended Statement of Claim struck out and plaintiff have leave to replead. Plaintiff to provide further particula…
John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd v Rivkin [2003] HCA 50
Citation 5

…o 5) [1994] 1 Qd R 156; Parkes v Prescott (1869) LR 4 Ex 169; Rowson & Anor v Alpass (2017) 53 VR 196; John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd v Rivkin (2003) 201 ALR 77; Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Obeid [2006] NSWCA 231 Ruling:Paragraph 6D of Proposed Further Amended Statement of Claim struck out and plaintiff…
Palmer Bruyn & Parker Pty Ltd v Parsons [2001] HCA 69
Citation 6

…law is in favour of the plaintiff being able to obtain damages, even where the false statements do not relate to his business or his goods.[9] [8] Palmer Bruyn & Parker Pty Ltd v Parsons (2001) 208 CLR 388 at 404, paragraph [52] [9] Palmer Bruyn & Parker Pty Ltd v Parsons ( ibid ). See Kirby J at paragraph [114], Hayne J at paragraph [154] and…
Dey v Victorian Railways Commissioners [1949] HCA 1
Citation 7

…aim be struck out Legislation Cited: County Court Civil Procedure Rules 2018, r23.02; r13.11(1) Cases Cited: Dey v Victorian Railways Commissioners (1949) 78 CLR 62; Takemoto v Moody’s Investors Service Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 1081; Trkulja v Google LLC (2018) 263 CLR 149; Dank v Whittaker (No 1) [2013] NSWSC 1062; Webb…
Webb v Bloch [1928] HCA 50
Citation 8

…ody’s Investors Service Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 1081; Trkulja v Google LLC (2018) 263 CLR 149; Dank v Whittaker (No 1) [2013] NSWSC 1062; Webb v Bloch (1928) 41 CLR 331; Thiess v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd (No 5) [1994] 1 Qd R 156; Parkes v Prescott (1869) LR 4 Ex 169; Rowson & Anor v Alpass (2017) 53 VR 196; John Fairfax…
Palmer-Bruyn & Parker Pty Ltd v Parsons [2000] HCATrans 575
Citation 9

…able to obtain damages, even where the false statements do not relate to his business or his goods.[9] [8] Palmer Bruyn & Parker Pty Ltd v Parsons (2001) 208 CLR 388 at 404, paragraph [52] [9] Palmer Bruyn & Parker Pty Ltd v Parsons ( ibid ). See Kirby J at paragraph [114], Hayne J at paragraph [154] and Callinan J…
Rowson v Alpass [2017] VSC 401
Citation 10

…Bloch (1928) 41 CLR 331; Thiess v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd (No 5) [1994] 1 Qd R 156; Parkes v Prescott (1869) LR 4 Ex 169; Rowson & Anor v Alpass (2017) 53 VR 196; John Fairfax Publications Pty Ltd v Rivkin (2003) 201 ALR 77; Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Obeid [2006] NSWCA 231 Ruling:Paragraph 6D of Propos…

AI Chat coming soon