Actions
Cases Citing This Decision
0
Statutory Material Cited
0
-
Spotlight Pty Ltd v NCON Australia Ltd
[2012] VSCA 232
Citation 1
…ning and fresh evidence then leads to a comparatively recent decision of the Court of Appeal in this State. In Spotlight Pty Ltd v NCON Australia Ltd [2012] VSCA 232 at paragraphs 24 to 26, the Court discussed the decision in Bradshaw. The Court said that it respectfully agreed with the four recognised classes of…
-
Allam v Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd
[2012] FCAFC 34
Citation 2
…Mr Christie also referred me to the decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia in Allam v Aristocratic Technologies and Ors (Aust) (2012) 95 IPR 242. I am not persuaded that the decision in that case, relating to leave to reopen for the purposes of tendering a chain of emails, should persuade me n…
-
Aheb and Aheb (No. 3)
[2009] FamCA 524
Citation 3
…8 In Murray v Figge (1974) 4 ALR 612, a decision of Muirhead J of the Supreme Court of the Northern Territory, reference was made to an earlier decision of Cleland J in Hughes v Hill [1937] SASR 285. In Hughes , his Honour stated:…
-
Inspector-General in Bankruptcy v Bradshaw
[2006] FCA 22
Citation 4
…9 What was said in Murray was later discussed, inter alia , by Kenny J in Inspector‑General in Bankruptcy & Anor v Bradshaw & Anor [2006] FCA 22 at paragraph 24. Her Honour there referred to the decision in Murray and to other cases. She stated that there were four recognised classes of case in which a Court may…
-
Valoutin Pty Ltd v Furst
[1998] FCA 339
Citation 5
…m Evidence Law in Victoria by Stephen Odgers that the word “business” should be construed liberally. The decision in Valoutin Pty Ltd v Furst (1998) 154 ALR 119 at 129 is mentioned in this regard. In any event, the documents being both partnership and individual tax returns of the plaintiffs, profit and loss statemen…