Administrative Appeals Tribunal
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL )
)No: 2008/3808
Veterans' Appeals Division )
Re: Dennis Hogno
Applicant
And: Repatriation Commission
RespondentOrder to amend written decision
TRIBUNAL: Senior Member Jill Toohey
DATE: 23 July 2010
PLACE: Sydney
1.On 29 April 2010, the Tribunal published a decision and written reasons in this proceeding.
2.The Tribunal is satisfied that that there is an obvious error in the text of the decision and the written statement of reasons and directs the Registrar, pursuant to subsection 43AA(1) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975, to alter the text of the decision from:
The Tribunal affirms the decision under review.
so that it now reads:
The Tribunal varies the decision under review by deciding that the veteran's anxiety disorder is war-caused and otherwise affirms the decision under review.
3.Paragraph 69 of the written statement of reasons is also amended to reflect the above wording.
.......................[sgd]............................
J Toohey
Senior Member
Administrative Appeals Tribunal
DECISION AND REASONS FOR DECISION [2010] AATA 306
ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL )
) No 2008/3808
Veterans' APPEALS DIVISION ) Re Dennis Hogno Applicant
And
Repatriation Commission
Respondent
DECISION
Tribunal Senior Member Jill Toohey
Dr Maxwell Thorpe, MemberDate29 April 2010
PlaceSydney
Decision The Tribunal affirms the decision under review.
..................[sgd]................................
Senior Member
CATCHWORDS
VETERANS’ ENTITLEMENT - special rate pension – alcohol dependence – anxiety disorder – cardiomyopathy – whether veteran suffered from alcohol dependence – whether alcohol dependence and anxiety war-caused – Tribunal satisfied that reasonable hypothesis raised in relation to anxiety disorder – Tribunal satisfied that anxiety disorder war-caused - reasonable hypothesis raised in connection with alcohol dependence but Tribunal satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that condition was not war-caused - not satisfied that veteran suffered from cardiomyopathy - not satisfied that veteran ceased employment for reasons related to war-caused condition alone – decision under review affirmed
Veterans Entitlements Act 1986 – s.120, s.24
Benjamin v Repatriation Commission (2001) 70 ALD 622
Cavell v Repatriation Commission (1988) 9AAR 534
Repatriation Commission v Deledio (1998) 83 FCR 82
Repatriation Commission v Hendy (2002) 76 ALD 47
REASONS FOR DECISION
19 April 2010 Senior Member Jill Toohey
Dr Maxwell Thorpe, MemberBackground
1. Dennis Hogno served in the Australian Army from May 1958, when he was sixteen years old, until May 1966. He served at Butterworth in Malaya from 14 January to 20 October 1965, which period is operational service for the purposes of the Veterans Entitlements Act 1986 (the Act).
2. Mr Hogno receives a disability pension at 100 per cent of the general rate for accepted conditions of atrial fibrillation, sensorineural hearing loss with tinnitus, ischaemic heart disease, impotence, tinea and chronic bronchitis.
3. Mr Hogno claims that events which occurred while he was in Malaya led to an increase in his drinking and to an anxiety disorder. He claims a special rate pension on the ground that war-caused alcohol dependence and anxiety disorder render him incapable of remunerative work. He claims also to have war-caused cardiomyopathy.
4.…
Continue reading Hogno and Repatriation Commission
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Hogno and Repatriation Commission [2010] AATA 306
- Case
- [2010] AATA 306
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine whether the veteran had suffered from alcohol dependence, and if this condition was war-caused. Additionally, the court needed to assess whether the veteran's anxiety disorder and cardiomyopathy were war-caused and if these conditions warranted the special rate pension. The court also had to consider whether the veteran ceased employment due to the war-caused conditions alone.
In its decision, the court found that the Tribunal was satisfied that a reasonable hypothesis had been raised in relation to the anxiety disorder, and that this condition was war-caused. However, the court determined that although a reasonable hypothesis was raised in connection with the alcohol dependence, it was satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that this condition was not war-caused. The Tribunal was also not satisfied that the veteran suffered from cardiomyopathy, nor was it satisfied that the veteran ceased employment for reasons related to the war-caused conditions alone. Consequently, the court affirmed the decision under review.
The final orders of the court were to affirm the decision of the Tribunal, meaning that the veteran's claims for the special rate pension were not upheld.
Orders
Orders of the court
The Tribunal affirms the decision under review.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.