Hoffmann and Hoffmann
[2007] FamCA 86
•31 January 2007
FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| HOFFMANN & HOFFMAN | [2007] FamCA 86 |
| FAMILY LAW - PROCEDURAL - non attendance by party - directions for undefended hearing |
| Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) |
| HUSBAND: | Mr Hoffmann |
| WIFE: | Mrs Hoffmann |
| FILE NUMBER: | MLF | 2207 | of | 2005 |
| DATE DELIVERED: | 31 January, 2007 |
| PLACE DELIVERED: | Melbourne |
| JUDGMENT OF: | Brown J |
| HEARING DATE: | 31 January, 2007 |
REPRESENTATION
| HUSBAND: | No appearance |
| WIFE: | In person |
Orders
That all extant applications be adjourned to the registrar’s list at 9:45 am. on 17 April, 2007.
That the Court send a sealed copy of this order to the husband at T, being the last known residential address provided by his former solicitors in a Notice of Ceasing to Act dated 20 April, 2006.
That in the event the husband fails to appear (in person or by a legal representative) on the adjourned date, the wife have leave to seek orders on an undefended basis.
That a sealed copy of this order be sent to the solicitors being retained by the wife, R. & G. Lawyers, DX 34046, Lilydale.
That the reasons for judgment this day be transcribed and that copies be made available to the parties.
| FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT MELBOURNE |
FILE NUMBER: MLF 2207 of 2005
| Mr Hoffmann |
Husband
And
| Mr Hoffmann |
Wife
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
The wife filed an application on 13 February 2006. The case has been adjourned a number of times. On my reading of the file, the husband last appeared on 1 June 2006. He did not appear at the conciliation conference on 24 July, or at another conciliation conference on 24 August, or at a directions hearing on 13 December.
The husband’s solicitors filed a notice of ceasing to act on 20 April 2006 in which they gave his last known residential address as T. The wife's then solicitor filed a notice of ceasing to act on 11 January, 2007 but I am advised that she has now retained further solicitors. They have not yet filed a notice of address for service.
In these circumstances, given the long delay since the filing of the application and the numerous non-appearances by the husband, I am satisfied the case be adjourned to a registrars' directions list to allow the wife’s new solicitors to familiarise themselves with the matter and readiness for trial. If the husband failed to attend on the adjourned date the wife will have leave to proceed on an undefended basis.
I certify that the preceding
3 paragraphs
are a true copy of the reasons for
judgment herein of the
Honourable Justice Brown.
Dated the day of 2007.
…………………………………………
Associate
IT IS NOTED that this judgment for all publication and reporting purposes be referred to as HOFFMANN & HOFFMANN
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Family Law
-
Civil Procedure
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
-
Jurisdiction
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Stay of Proceedings
0
0
1