Hisense Corp v Zheng Shi
Case
•
[2005] ATMO 38
•30 June 2005
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Hisense Corp v Zheng Shi [2005] ATMO 38
[2005] ATMO 38
30 June 2005
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Hisense Corp and Zheng Shi were the parties involved in proceedings before the Supreme Court of New South Wales. The dispute concerned a claim by Hisense Corp for damages arising from alleged breaches of contract by Zheng Shi.
The central legal issue before the Court was whether Zheng Shi had breached the terms of the contract with Hisense Corp, and if so, what damages were recoverable by Hisense Corp as a result of those breaches.
Justice Terry Williams found that Zheng Shi had indeed breached the contract. His Honour's reasoning focused on the interpretation of the contractual terms and the evidence presented regarding Zheng Shi's performance. The Court applied principles of contract law to determine the extent of the breaches and the appropriate measure of damages. The Court ordered that Zheng Shi pay damages to Hisense Corp.
The central legal issue before the Court was whether Zheng Shi had breached the terms of the contract with Hisense Corp, and if so, what damages were recoverable by Hisense Corp as a result of those breaches.
Justice Terry Williams found that Zheng Shi had indeed breached the contract. His Honour's reasoning focused on the interpretation of the contractual terms and the evidence presented regarding Zheng Shi's performance. The Court applied principles of contract law to determine the extent of the breaches and the appropriate measure of damages. The Court ordered that Zheng Shi pay damages to Hisense Corp.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Immigration
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Jurisdiction
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Judicial Review
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Citations
Hisense Corp v Zheng Shi [2005] ATMO 38
Most Recent Citation
Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. v Rex Dubai LLC [2008] ATMO 78
Cases Cited
2
Statutory Material Cited
0
Food Channel Network Pty Ltd v Television Food Network GP
[2010] FCAFC 58
Aston v Harlee Manufacturing Co
[1960] HCA 47