-
Dundar v Bas
[2019] VSCA 315
Citation 1
(Para 1)
…with legal consequences.[17] [15]Administrative Law Act, s 10. [16] Gamble v Emerald Hill Electrical Pty Ltd (2012) 38 VR 45, [9], [20]; Dundar v Bas [2019] VSCA 315, [51]. [17] Colquhoun , [45]; cf Wingfoot , [55], in relation to the duty to provide reasons imposed by s 68(2) of the Accident Compensation Act 1985…
-
Maimonis v Bourke
[2019] VSCA 302
Citation 2
(Para 1)
…52 CLR 480, [47] ( Wingfoot ); Colquhoun v Capitol Radiology Pty Ltd (2013) 39 VR 296, [14]–[16], [18] ( Colquhoun ); Maimonis v Bourke [2019] VSCA 302, [51](1). [9]Wrongs Act, s 28LB (definition of ‘medical question’).…
-
Chang v Neill
[2019] VSCA 151
Citation 3
(Para 1)
…y effect on her existing scarring, in circumstances where her lay description was the only information the Panel had about the planned surgery. [25](2019) 62 VR 174, [74]–[80], [92] ( Chang ). [26]Referring to Chang , [93]–[100].…
-
Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA
[2019] HCA 3
Citation 4
(Para 1)
…Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 264 CLR 123, [29]–[31], [72]; Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA (2019) 264 CLR 421, [45], [48], [84]–[95].…
-
Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
[2018] HCA 34
Citation 5
(Para 1)
…s on a waiting list for surgery to her left breast. [32] Chang , [100], referring to Hossain v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 264 CLR 123, [29]–[31], [72]; Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZMTA (2019) 264 CLR 421, [45], [48], [84]–[95].…
-
Wei v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection
[2015] HCA 51
Citation 6
(Para 1)
…ities. [46]Referring to Wingfoot , [47]; Schmael v Leach [2020] VSC 562, [37] ( Schmael ); Wei v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2015) 257 CLR 22, [49] (Nettle J); Prasad v Minister for Ethnic Affairs (1985) 6 FCR 155, 169–170 ( Prasad ).…
-
Wingfoot Australia Partners Pty Ltd v Kocak
[2013] HCA 43
Citation 7
(Para 1)
…lting from injury to the claimant alleged in the claim satisfies the threshold level’.[9] [8] Wingfoot Australia Partners Pty Ltd v Kocak (2013) 252 CLR 480, [47] ( Wingfoot ); Colquhoun v Capitol Radiology Pty Ltd (2013) 39 VR 296, [14]–[16], [18] ( Colquhoun ); Maimonis v Bourke [2019] VSCA 302, [51](1). [9]Wrongs…
-
Colquhoun v Capitol Radiology Pty Ltd
[2013] VSCA 58
Citation 8
(Para 1)
…ed in the claim satisfies the threshold level’.[9] [8] Wingfoot Australia Partners Pty Ltd v Kocak (2013) 252 CLR 480, [47] ( Wingfoot ); Colquhoun v Capitol Radiology Pty Ltd (2013) 39 VR 296, [14]–[16], [18] ( Colquhoun ); Maimonis v Bourke [2019] VSCA 302, [51](1). [9]Wrongs Act, s 28LB (definition of ‘medical question’).…
-
Gamble v Emerald Hill Electrical Pty Ltd
[2012] VSCA 322
Citation 9
(Para 1)
…asons given would not amount to an error with legal consequences.[17] [15]Administrative Law Act, s 10. [16] Gamble v Emerald Hill Electrical Pty Ltd (2012) 38 VR 45, [9], [20]; Dundar v Bas [2019] VSCA 315, [51]. [17] Colquhoun , [45]; cf Wingfoot , [55], in relation to the duty to provide reasons imposed by s 68…
-
East Melbourne Group Inc v Minister for Planning
[2008] VSCA 217
Citation 10
(Para 1)
…hat purpose if the stated reasons were able to be replaced by different reasons.’[20] [18] East Melbourne Group Inc v Minister for Planning (2008) 23 VR 605, [308], [310] (Ashley and Redlich JJA) ( East Melbourne Group ). [19] East Melbourne Group , [309] (Ashley and Redlich JJA). [20] East Melbourne Group , [310]…
-
Applicant A91 of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs
[2003] FCA 1388
Citation 11
(Para 1)
…[37] ( Schmael ); Wei v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2015) 257 CLR 22, [49] (Nettle J); Prasad v Minister for Ethnic Affairs (1985) 6 FCR 155, 169–170 ( Prasad ).…
-
Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang
[1996] HCA 6
Citation 12
(Para 1)
…a statement of its reasons for a determination, if requested to do so by any person affected by the determination: Masters v McCubbery [1996] 1 VR 635, 651 (Winneke P); Ingle v Australia Pacific Airports (Melbourne) Pty Ltd [2021] VSC 50, [24].…
-
Prasad v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs
[1985] FCA 46
Citation 13
(Para 1)
…47]; Schmael v Leach [2020] VSC 562, [37] ( Schmael ); Wei v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2015) 257 CLR 22, [49] (Nettle J); Prasad v Minister for Ethnic Affairs (1985) 6 FCR 155, 169–170 ( Prasad ).…
-
Addison-Radford v State of Victoria
[2023] VSC 457
Citation 14
(Para 1)
…trictions related to diffuse breast pain, as this was plain from Chapter 13 of the AMA Guides. [45]Referring to Addison‑Radford v State of Victoria [2023] VSC 457, [77]–[79].…
-
La'Brooy v Jensen
[2021] VSC 89
Citation 15
(Para 1)
…2. It withdrew that contention at trial: Transcript, 16 February 2024, 41:27–42:2. [37]Referring to Karabinis , [69]; La’Brooy v Jensen [2021] VSC 89, [56] ( La’Brooy ).…
-
Ingle v Australia Pacific Airports (Melbourne) Pty Ltd
[2021] VSC 50
Citation 16
(Para 1)
…n affected by the determination: Masters v McCubbery [1996] 1 VR 635, 651 (Winneke P); Ingle v Australia Pacific Airports (Melbourne) Pty Ltd [2021] VSC 50, [24].…
-
Schmael v Leach
[2020] VSC 562
Citation 17
(Para 1)
…as not the main contributing factor to any impairment or restriction of her daily activities. [46]Referring to Wingfoot , [47]; Schmael v Leach [2020] VSC 562, [37] ( Schmael ); Wei v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2015) 257 CLR 22, [49] (Nettle J); Prasad v Minister for Ethnic Affairs (1985) 6 F…
-
City of Melbourne v Neppessen
[2019] VSC 84
Citation 18
(Para 1)
…t in Ms Hillier’s right and left breast impairment, which had to be disregarded under s 28LL(3). [24]Referring to City of Melbourne v Neppessen [2019] VSC 84, [122]–[123].…
-
Adams v Wadesley
[2018] VSC 304
Citation 19
(Para 1)
…e not so limited, and included scarring and other disorders below the surface of the skin. [50]Referring to Wrongs Act, s 28LL(1); Adams v Wadesley [2018] VSC 304, [80]–[105]; Melbourne Health v Lloyd [2009] VSC 370, [9].…
-
Karabinis v Bendrups
[2017] VSC 648
Citation 20
(Para 1)
…ory taking.[35] Rather, she had identified two specific errors, one of which had been conceded by Monash. [35]Referring to Karabinis v Bendrups [2017] VSC 648, [82] ( Karabinis ).…
-
Omerasevic v Kotzman
[2016] VSC 383
Citation 21
(Para 1)
…determine what information should be provided.[42] [41]Referring to Masters v McCubbery [1996] 1 VR 635; Wingfoot , [47]; Omerasevic v Kotzman [2016] VSC 383, [58]–[73]. [42]Referring to Chang , [52]–[53].…
-
Deitrich v Pulse Pharmacy Northcote Pty Ltd
[2014] VSC 307
Citation 22
…(a) it was an error of fact made within the Panel’s exercise of its jurisdiction;[27] [27]Referring to Deitrich v Pulse Pharmacy Northcote Pty Ltd [2014] VSC 307, [74]–[75] ( Deitrich ).…
-
Melbourne Health v Lloyd
[2009] VSC 370
Citation 23
(Para 1)
…ders below the surface of the skin. [50]Referring to Wrongs Act, s 28LL(1); Adams v Wadesley [2018] VSC 304, [80]–[105]; Melbourne Health v Lloyd [2009] VSC 370, [9].…
-
Vegco Pty Ltd v Gibbons
[2008] VSC 363
Citation 24
(Para 1)
…e submitted there would be an appearance of unfairness if the same Panel members were to conduct a fresh assessment. [51] Vegco Pty Ltd v Gibbons [2008] VSC 363, [33]…