Actions
Cases Citing This Decision
5
-
GRC Project Pty Ltd trading as GRC Property Management v Lai
[2023] NSWDC 63
Citation 1
(Para 28)
…tations were conveyed, the problem of their correct determination in serious harm trials (see High Quality Jewellers Pty Ltd & Ors v Ramaihi (Ruling) [2022] VCC 2240 at [10]-[13] per Clayton J, referring to Zimmerman v Perkiss at [9]-[11], where I had also made this point) did not need to be considered.…
-
Scott v Bodley (No 2)
[2022] NSWDC 651
Citation 2
(Para 5)
…wed that ruling, Clayton J held that the plaintiffs failed to establish serious harm: High Quality Jewellers Pty Ltd & Ors v Ramaihi (Ruling) [2022] VCC 2240) (“ High Quality Jewellers ”)).…
-
Supaphien v Chaiyabarn
[2023] ACTSC 240
Citation 3
…36 CLR 214 Banks v Cadwalladr [2022] EWHC 1417 (QB) Bazzi v Dutton [2022] FCAFC 84; 289 FCR 1 High Quality Jewellers Pty Ltd & Ors v Ramaihi (Ruling) [2022] VCC 2240…
-
Mann v Sharma (Ruling)
[2025] VCC 1170
Citation 4
…de News Pty Ltd (No 3) [2024] QSC 192; Mond v The Age Company Pty Limited [2025] FCA 442; High Quality Jewellers Pty Ltd v Ramaihi (Ruling) [2022] VCC 2240; Baker & Anor v Mutton [2014] VSCA 302; Harmonious Blend Building Corporation v Keene (No 2) [2015] VSC 276; James v Faddoul [2007] NSWSC 821 Ruling: Applicati…
-
Ibrahim v Ye
[2025] VCC 106
Citation 5
…ee for example Scott v Bodley (No 2) [2022] NSWDC 651 at 34; High Quality Jewellers Pty Ltd & Ors v Ramaihi [2022] VCC 2240 at 21. 66I am not satisfied that Dr Ibrahim has established that the reviews have been read by a substantial number of people. 67There is no platform of facts upon which I can draw an inferen…
Statutory Material Cited
0
-
Zimmerman v Perkiss
[2022] NSWDC 448
Citation 1
…ation – Google review published on plaintiffs’ Google business page Legislation Cited: Defamation Act 2005 (Vic) Cases Cited: Zimmerman v Perkiss [2022] NSWDC 448; Newman v Whittington [2022] NSWSC 249; High Quality Jewellers Pty Ltd (ACN 119 428 394) & Ors v Ramaihi (Ruling) [2022] VCC 1924; Rader v Haines [2022]…
-
Rader v Haines
[2022] NSWCA 198
Citation 2
…Newman v Whittington [2022] NSWSC 249; High Quality Jewellers Pty Ltd (ACN 119 428 394) & Ors v Ramaihi (Ruling) [2022] VCC 1924; Rader v Haines [2022] NSWCA 198; Dhir v Saddler [2017] EWHC 3155 (QB); [2018] 4 W.L.R.1 [55]; George v Cannell and another [2021] EWHC 2988 (QB) [118] Ruling: The second, third and four…
-
Newman v Whittington
[2022] NSWSC 249
Citation 3
…ntiffs’ Google business page Legislation Cited: Defamation Act 2005 (Vic) Cases Cited: Zimmerman v Perkiss [2022] NSWDC 448; Newman v Whittington [2022] NSWSC 249; High Quality Jewellers Pty Ltd (ACN 119 428 394) & Ors v Ramaihi (Ruling) [2022] VCC 1924; Rader v Haines [2022] NSWCA 198; Dhir v Saddler [2017] EWHC 3…
-
Lorbek v King
[2022] VSC 218
Citation 4
…inference can be drawn as to the extent of the publication.”[9] [8][2022] VSC 218 [9](Supra) [71] 30Given the nature of the platform upon which publication occurred, being a review on a Google business page that appears as part of a search engine function, I cannot be satisfied that all of those who visited the…
-
High Quality Jewellers Pty Ltd (ACN 119 428 394) v Ramaihi (Ruling)
[2022] VCC 1924
Citation 5
…rman v Perkiss [2022] NSWDC 448; Newman v Whittington [2022] NSWSC 249; High Quality Jewellers Pty Ltd (ACN 119 428 394) & Ors v Ramaihi (Ruling) [2022] VCC 1924; Rader v Haines [2022] NSWCA 198; Dhir v Saddler [2017] EWHC 3155 (QB); [2018] 4 W.L.R.1 [55]; George v Cannell and another [2021] EWHC 2988 (QB) [118] R…