FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| HIGGINS & TURNER & ANOR | [2014] FCCA 2635 |
| Catchwords: CHILD SUPPORT – Reasons for judgment. |
| Legislation: Family Law Act 1975 |
| Applicant: | MR HIGGINS |
| First Respondent: | MS TURNER |
| Second Respondent: | CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR |
| File Number: | MLC 8649 of 2012 |
| Judgment of: | Judge Burchardt |
| Hearing date: | 29 September 2014 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 29 September 2014 |
| Delivered at: | Melbourne |
| Delivered on: | 29 September 2014 |
REPRESENTATION
| Counsel for the Applicant: | Mr Hutchins |
| Solicitors for the Applicant: | McBain Lawyers |
| First Respondent: | No appearance |
| Counsel for the Second Respondent: | Mr Maat |
| Solicitors for the Second Respondent: | Australian Government Solicitor |
ORDERS
The Registrar of the Child Support Agency be joined as a party to these proceedings.
The arrears of Child Support (including any assessed late payment penalties) said to be owed by the Applicant to the Respondent regarding the child X born (omitted) 2001 (Child Support case reference number (omitted)) be discharged and revoked, the Court having found no arrears exist.
The Child Support Registrar be stayed from enforcing and collecting any Child Support arrears (“any associated late payment penalties”) pending further order of this Court.
The further hearing of this matter be adjourned not before 13 May 2019.
This is a provisional order pursuant to Regulation 36, 38 and 38A of the Family Law Regulations and Article 11 of the Child Support (Reciprocal Agreement with Australia) Order 2000.
The Child Support Registrar credit the Applicant with the payments for arrears already made by him against his ongoing Child Support liability.
NOTATION
(A)The Applicant is still obliged to pay his ongoing Child Support liability assessed from time to time but subject to Order 6.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Higgins & Turner & Anor is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
.
| FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT AT MELBOURNE |
MLC 8649 of 2012
| MR HIGGINS |
Applicant
And
| MS TURNER |
First Respondent
| CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR |
Second Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
On 29 September 2014 I made interim orders in a complicated child support matter. Although the transcript of the hearing shows that I gave some indication as to why it was that I was making the orders that I did make, no one asked me for extensive reasons. I understand the matter is now the subject of an appeal. The Registrar of this Court has requested that I forward reasons for judgment.
I have been careful not to read the Notice of Appeal (although a copy was emailed to me for information) lest I fall into the trap of seeking retrospectively to justify myself rather than indicating the thought process that actually led me to make the judgment. In order to understand the interim orders made, it is necessary to examine the Court file and the way the matter progressed in some detail.
On 17 October 2011 the applicant’s then solicitors filed an Application…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Higgins and Turner and Anor and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2014] FCCA 2635
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was the existence and enforceability of the claimed child support arrears. The court was tasked with examining the evidence to ascertain if any outstanding child support payments were due and payable by the applicant.
Judge Burchardt found that no arrears of child support existed. Consequently, the court ordered that the alleged arrears and any associated late payment penalties be discharged and revoked. The Registrar of the Child Support Agency was joined as a party to the proceedings and was stayed from enforcing or collecting any purported arrears pending further order. The applicant was to be credited with any payments already made towards these discharged arrears against his ongoing child support liability. The matter was adjourned for a further hearing.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
The Registrar of the Child Support Agency be joined as a party to these proceedings.
2.
The arrears of Child Support (including any assessed late payment penalties) said to be owed by the Applicant to the Respondent regarding the child X born (omitted) 2001 (Child Support case reference number (omitted)) be discharged and revoked, the Court having found no arrears exist.
3.
The Child Support Registrar be stayed from enforcing and collecting any Child Support arrears (“any associated late payment penalties”) pending further order of this Court.
4.
The further hearing of this matter be adjourned not before 13 May 2019.
5.
This is a provisional order pursuant to Regulation 36, 38 and 38A of the Family Law Regulations and Article 11 of the Child Support (Reciprocal Agreement with Australia) Order 2000.
6.
The Child Support Registrar credit the Applicant with the payments for arrears already made by him against his ongoing Child Support liability.
NOTATION
(A) The Applicant is still obliged to pay his ongoing Child Support liability assessed from time to time but subject to Order 6.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.