Higgins and Turner and Anor

Link copied
Case Copied 11 min read

FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA

HIGGINS & TURNER & ANOR [2014] FCCA 2635
Catchwords:
CHILD SUPPORT – Reasons for judgment.

Legislation:  

Family Law Act 1975
Family Law Regulations 1984, regs.36, 38, 38A
Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988

Applicant: MR HIGGINS
First Respondent: MS TURNER
Second Respondent: CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR
File Number: MLC 8649 of 2012
Judgment of: Judge Burchardt
Hearing date: 29 September 2014
Date of Last Submission: 29 September 2014
Delivered at: Melbourne
Delivered on: 29 September 2014

REPRESENTATION

Counsel for the Applicant: Mr Hutchins
Solicitors for the Applicant: McBain Lawyers
First Respondent: No appearance
Counsel for the Second Respondent: Mr Maat
Solicitors for the Second Respondent: Australian Government Solicitor

ORDERS

  1. The Registrar of the Child Support Agency be joined as a party to these proceedings. 

  2. The arrears of Child Support (including any assessed late payment penalties) said to be owed by the Applicant to the Respondent regarding the child X born (omitted) 2001 (Child Support case reference number (omitted)) be discharged and revoked, the Court having found no arrears exist. 

  3. The Child Support Registrar be stayed from enforcing and collecting any Child Support arrears (“any associated late payment penalties”) pending further order of this Court. 

  4. The further hearing of this matter be adjourned not before 13 May 2019. 

  5. This is a provisional order pursuant to Regulation 36, 38 and 38A of the Family Law Regulations and Article 11 of the Child Support (Reciprocal Agreement with Australia) Order 2000.

  6. The Child Support Registrar credit the Applicant with the payments for arrears already made by him against his ongoing Child Support liability.

NOTATION

(A)The Applicant is still obliged to pay his ongoing Child Support liability assessed from time to time but subject to Order 6.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Higgins & Turner & Anor is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

.

FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT
OF AUSTRALIA

AT MELBOURNE

MLC 8649 of 2012

MR HIGGINS

Applicant

And

MS TURNER

First Respondent

CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR

Second Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

  1. On 29 September 2014 I made interim orders in a complicated child support matter.  Although the transcript of the hearing shows that I gave some indication as to why it was that I was making the orders that I did make, no one asked me for extensive reasons.  I understand the matter is now the subject of an appeal.  The Registrar of this Court has requested that I forward reasons for judgment.

  2. I have been careful not to read the Notice of Appeal (although a copy was emailed to me for information) lest I fall into the trap of seeking retrospectively to justify myself rather than indicating the thought process that actually led me to make the judgment.  In order to understand the interim orders made, it is necessary to examine the Court file and the way the matter progressed in some detail.

  3. On 17 October 2011 the applicant’s then solicitors filed an Application…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Higgins and Turner and Anor and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2014] FCCA 2635
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of *Higgins and Turner and Anor*, heard by Judge Burchardt, the proceedings concerned a dispute regarding alleged arrears of child support owed by the applicant to the respondent in relation to a child born in 2001. The court was required to determine whether these arrears, including any associated late payment penalties, were in fact owed and, if so, to what extent.

The central legal issue before the court was the existence and enforceability of the claimed child support arrears. The court was tasked with examining the evidence to ascertain if any outstanding child support payments were due and payable by the applicant.

Judge Burchardt found that no arrears of child support existed. Consequently, the court ordered that the alleged arrears and any associated late payment penalties be discharged and revoked. The Registrar of the Child Support Agency was joined as a party to the proceedings and was stayed from enforcing or collecting any purported arrears pending further order. The applicant was to be credited with any payments already made towards these discharged arrears against his ongoing child support liability. The matter was adjourned for a further hearing.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

The Registrar of the Child Support Agency be joined as a party to these proceedings.

2.

The arrears of Child Support (including any assessed late payment penalties) said to be owed by the Applicant to the Respondent regarding the child X born (omitted) 2001 (Child Support case reference number (omitted)) be discharged and revoked, the Court having found no arrears exist.

3.

The Child Support Registrar be stayed from enforcing and collecting any Child Support arrears (“any associated late payment penalties”) pending further order of this Court.

4.

The further hearing of this matter be adjourned not before 13 May 2019.

5.

This is a provisional order pursuant to Regulation 36, 38 and 38A of the Family Law Regulations and Article 11 of the Child Support (Reciprocal Agreement with Australia) Order 2000.

6.

The Child Support Registrar credit the Applicant with the payments for arrears already made by him against his ongoing Child Support liability.

NOTATION

(A) The Applicant is still obliged to pay his ongoing Child Support liability assessed from time to time but subject to Order 6.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.