FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| HICKSON & GREEN | [2017] FamCA 1124 |
| FAMILY LAW – CHILDREN – Parenting orders – Variation – Where child and family psychiatrist raises serious concerns in single expert report, yet to be tested, about the capacity of the mother and recommends the mother have no contact with the children for six months – Where the applicant father sought a variation of interim parenting orders to suspend the children’s supervised time and telephone communication with the mother – Where the children enjoy spending time with their mother – Where the telephone communication can be problematic and difficult – Concluded the supervised visits for the children take place in a safe, supervised setting – Concluded the suspension of telephone calls eliminates the risk of the mother negatively impacting the children – Ordered the suspension of all telephone communication between the mother and the children – Ordered the mother may provide her treating psychiatrist a copy of the single expert report |
| APPLICANT: | Mr Hickson |
| RESPONDENT: | Ms Green |
| INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: | Hannaway Lawyers |
| FILE NUMBER: | NCC | 2356 | of | 2015 |
| DATE DELIVERED: | 14 December 2017 |
| PLACE DELIVERED: | Newcastle |
| PLACE HEARD: | Newcastle |
| JUDGMENT OF: | Cleary J |
| HEARING DATE: | 13 December 2017 |
REPRESENTATION
| COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT: | N/A |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: | Priest Legal |
| COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: | N/A |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT: | Georgia Flynn Solicitors |
| COUNSEL FOR THE INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: | N/A |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: | Hannaway Lawyers |
Orders
Order 1.6 [as set out herein] of the orders made 10 February 2017 is suspended:
1.6By telephone every Tuesday with the mother to initiate the call between 6.00 pm and 6.30 pm and the father to make the children available to speak with the mother, commencing after the first contact visit the children have with the mother at [G Group].
The mother is restrained from contacting the children, or any of them, by telephone or permitting third parties to contact the children on her behalf.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT
The Independent Children’s Lawyer to provide a copy of these orders to G Group Contact Centre.
By consent, the mother has leave to provide to her treating psychiatrist Dr J a copy of the report dated 13 October 2017 of Dr K, child and family psychiatrist.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Hickson & Green has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for Judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 17.02 Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth).
| FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT NEWCASTLE |
FILE NUMBER: NCC2356/2015
| Mr Hickson |
Applicant
And
| Ms Green |
Respondent
And
| Independent Children’s Lawyer |
EX-TEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Introduction
This…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Hickson and Green and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2017] FamCA 1124
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine whether to suspend an existing order for telephone contact between the mother and the children, and whether to restrain the mother from contacting the children directly or indirectly through third parties. The court also considered the role of the Independent Children's Lawyer in disseminating the orders and the mother's access to her treating psychiatrist.
Cleary J ordered that the existing telephone contact arrangement, whereby the mother was to initiate calls every Tuesday between 6:00 pm and 6:30 pm, be suspended. This suspension was to commence after the children's first contact visit with the mother at the G Group Contact Centre. Furthermore, the mother was restrained from contacting the children by telephone or by permitting third parties to contact them on her behalf. The Independent Children's Lawyer was directed to provide a copy of these orders to the G Group Contact Centre. By consent, the mother was granted leave to provide a specific report to her treating psychiatrist.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
Order 1.6 [as set out herein] of the orders made 10 February 2017 is suspended:
1.6 By telephone every Tuesday with the mother to initiate the call between 6.00 pm and 6.30 pm and the father to make the children available to speak with the mother, commencing after the first contact visit the children have with the mother at [G Group].
2.
The mother is restrained from contacting the children, or any of them, by telephone or permitting third parties to contact the children on her behalf.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT
3.
The Independent Children’s Lawyer to provide a copy of these orders to G Group Contact Centre.
4.
By consent, the mother has leave to provide to her treating psychiatrist Dr J a copy of the report dated 13 October 2017 of Dr K, child and family psychiatrist.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.