Hickson and Green

Link copied
Case Copied 11 min read

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

HICKSON & GREEN [2017] FamCA 1124
FAMILY LAW – CHILDREN – Parenting orders – Variation – Where child and family psychiatrist raises serious concerns in single expert report, yet to be tested, about the capacity of the mother and recommends the mother have no contact with the children for six months – Where the applicant father sought a variation of interim parenting orders to suspend the children’s supervised time and telephone communication with the mother – Where the children enjoy spending time with their mother – Where the telephone communication can be problematic and difficult – Concluded the supervised visits for the children take place in a safe, supervised setting – Concluded the suspension of telephone calls eliminates the risk of the mother negatively impacting the children – Ordered the suspension of all telephone communication between the mother and the children – Ordered the mother may provide her treating psychiatrist a copy of the single expert  report
APPLICANT: Mr Hickson
RESPONDENT: Ms Green
INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: Hannaway Lawyers
FILE NUMBER: NCC 2356 of 2015
DATE DELIVERED: 14 December 2017
PLACE DELIVERED: Newcastle
PLACE HEARD: Newcastle
JUDGMENT OF: Cleary J
HEARING DATE: 13 December 2017

REPRESENTATION

COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT: N/A
SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: Priest Legal
COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: N/A
SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT: Georgia Flynn Solicitors
COUNSEL FOR THE INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: N/A
SOLICITOR FOR THE INDEPENDENT CHILDREN’S LAWYER: Hannaway Lawyers

Orders

  1. Order 1.6 [as set out herein] of the orders made 10 February 2017 is suspended:

    1.6By telephone every Tuesday with the mother to initiate the call between 6.00 pm and 6.30 pm and the father to make the children available to speak with the mother, commencing after the first contact visit the children have with the mother at [G Group].

  2. The mother is restrained from contacting the children, or any of them, by telephone or permitting third parties to contact the children on her behalf.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT

  1. The Independent Children’s Lawyer to provide a copy of these orders to G Group Contact Centre.

  2. By consent, the mother has leave to provide to her treating psychiatrist Dr J a copy of the report dated 13 October 2017 of Dr K, child and family psychiatrist.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Hickson & Green has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for Judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 17.02 Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth).

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT NEWCASTLE

FILE NUMBER:  NCC2356/2015

Mr Hickson

Applicant

And

Ms Green

Respondent

And

Independent Children’s Lawyer

EX-TEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

Introduction

  1. This…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Hickson and Green and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2017] FamCA 1124
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This matter concerned an application before Cleary J in the Federal Circuit Court of Australia, brought by the father of two children against the mother. The dispute revolved around the mother's contact with the children, specifically concerning telephone contact arrangements and the mother's ability to permit third-party contact.

The court was required to determine whether to suspend an existing order for telephone contact between the mother and the children, and whether to restrain the mother from contacting the children directly or indirectly through third parties. The court also considered the role of the Independent Children's Lawyer in disseminating the orders and the mother's access to her treating psychiatrist.

Cleary J ordered that the existing telephone contact arrangement, whereby the mother was to initiate calls every Tuesday between 6:00 pm and 6:30 pm, be suspended. This suspension was to commence after the children's first contact visit with the mother at the G Group Contact Centre. Furthermore, the mother was restrained from contacting the children by telephone or by permitting third parties to contact them on her behalf. The Independent Children's Lawyer was directed to provide a copy of these orders to the G Group Contact Centre. By consent, the mother was granted leave to provide a specific report to her treating psychiatrist.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

Order 1.6 [as set out herein] of the orders made 10 February 2017 is suspended:

1.6 By telephone every Tuesday with the mother to initiate the call between 6.00 pm and 6.30 pm and the father to make the children available to speak with the mother, commencing after the first contact visit the children have with the mother at [G Group].

2.

The mother is restrained from contacting the children, or any of them, by telephone or permitting third parties to contact the children on her behalf.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT

3.

The Independent Children’s Lawyer to provide a copy of these orders to G Group Contact Centre.

4.

By consent, the mother has leave to provide to her treating psychiatrist Dr J a copy of the report dated 13 October 2017 of Dr K, child and family psychiatrist.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.