Legal Research
Cases
Hicks v Quattro Capital Group Pty Ltd (No 2)

Hicks v Quattro Capital Group Pty Ltd (No 2)

Case [2022] VCC 1594

No judgment structure available for this case.

Type to search within this case.

This content is currently unavailable.

Details

AGLC: Hicks v Quattro Capital Group Pty Ltd (No 2) [2022] VCC 1594
Case: [2022] VCC 1594
Decision Date: 28 September 2022

CaseChat Overview and Summary

AI summary not yet generated for this case.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.

Actions

Citations

Hicks v Quattro Capital Group Pty Ltd (No 2) [2022] VCC 1594

Cases Citing This Decision

Cases Cited

Statutory Material Cited

Paragreen v Lim Group Holdings Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] VSCA 97
Citation 1

…13 BPR 24; [2007] NSWCA 306; Bostik Australia Pty Ltd v Liddiard (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 304; Paragreen v Lim Group Holdings Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] VSCA 97; Stanley v Philips (1966) 115 CLR 470 Judgment:The plaintiff must pay the defendant’s costs of the proceeding to be assessed on a standard basis in default of agre…
Bostik Australia Pty Ltd v Liddiard (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 304
Citation 2

…95] QB 137, 154; Yazgi v Permanent Custodians Ltd (No 2) (2007) 13 BPR 24; [2007] NSWCA 306; Bostik Australia Pty Ltd v Liddiard (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 304; Paragreen v Lim Group Holdings Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] VSCA 97; Stanley v Philips (1966) 115 CLR 470 Judgment:The plaintiff must pay the defendant’s costs of the pr…
Sabah Yazgi v Permanent Custodians Limited (No 2) [2007] NSWCA 306
Citation 3

…up Pty Ltd [2022] VCC 1255; Beoco Ltd v Alfa Laval Co Ltd [1995] QB 137, 154; Yazgi v Permanent Custodians Ltd (No 2) (2007) 13 BPR 24; [2007] NSWCA 306; Bostik Australia Pty Ltd v Liddiard (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 304; Paragreen v Lim Group Holdings Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] VSCA 97; Stanley v Philips (1966) 115 CLR 470 Ju…
Yazgi v Permanent Custodians Ltd [2007] NSWCA 240
Citation 4

…Subject:COSTS Catchwords: Costs application to enforce adjudication by Australian Financial Complaints Authority unsuccessful – costs order on standard basis in favour of defendant – defendant’s success not to be regarded as a result of a “late amendment” – plaintiff’s success on some points did not…
Moratic Pty Ltd v Gordon [2007] NSWSC 5
Citation 5

…uattro Capital Group Pty Ltd [2022] VCC 1255; Beoco Ltd v Alfa Laval Co Ltd [1995] QB 137, 154; Yazgi v Permanent Custodians Ltd (No 2) (2007) 13 BPR 24; [2007] NSWCA 306; Bostik Australia Pty Ltd v Liddiard (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 304; Paragreen v Lim Group Holdings Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] VSCA 97; Stanley v Philips (19…
Stanley v Phillips [1966] HCA 24
Citation 6

…k Australia Pty Ltd v Liddiard (No 2) [2009] NSWCA 304; Paragreen v Lim Group Holdings Pty Ltd (No 2) [2020] VSCA 97; Stanley v Philips (1966) 115 CLR 470 Judgment:The plaintiff must pay the defendant’s costs of the proceeding to be assessed on a standard basis in default of agreement.…
Hicks v Quattro Capital Group Pty Ltd [2022] VCC 1255
Citation 7

…follow the event Legislation Cited: R 63A.31 County Court Civil Procedure Rules 2018 Cases Cited: Hicks v Quattro Capital Group Pty Ltd [2022] VCC 1255; Beoco Ltd v Alfa Laval Co Ltd [1995] QB 137, 154; Yazgi v Permanent Custodians Ltd (No 2) (2007) 13 BPR 24; [2007] NSWCA 306; Bostik Australia Pty Ltd v Liddiard…

AI Chat coming soon