HFG

Case [2013] QCAT 327


CITATION: HFG [2013] QCAT 327
PARTIES: HFG
APPLICATION NUMBER: GAA3080-13 GAA3081-13
GAA4274-13 GAA4275-13
MATTER TYPE: Guardianship and administration matters for adults
HEARING DATE: 18 June 2013
HEARD AT: Rockhampton
DECISION OF: Philippa Beckinsale, Member
DELIVERED ON: 3 July 2013
DELIVERED AT: Brisbane
ORDERS MADE:

Guardianship:
1. DDL is appointed as guardian for HFG born  August 1995 upon HFG turning 18 years, for decisions about the following personal matters:

(a)  health care;

(b)  provision of services;

(c)  whether HFG works and, if so, the kind and place of work and employer;

(d)  what education or training HFG undertakes.

2. This appointment remains current until  
    August 2014.

Administration:
3. The Public Trustee of Queensland is
    appointed as administrator for HFG born   August 1995 upon HFG turning 18 years, for all financial matters.
4. The Tribunal dispenses with the
    requirement for the administrator to
    provide a financial management plan.
5. The Tribunal directs the administrator to
     provide accounts to the administrator
     when requested.
6. This appointment remains current until
    August 2014.

CATCHWORDS:

GUARDIANSHIP - whether appropriate appointment – where conflict between parents.
ADMINISTRATION - who is most appropriate appointment – where conflict between parents.

Guardianship and Administration Act 2000 ss 13, 14, 15.

APPEARANCES and REPRESENTATION (if any):
The adult’s mother DL attended and was represented by Ms Katherine Lord, solicitor from Grant and Simpson. The adult’s father VG and brother EG attended.

REASONS FOR DECISION

  1. HG is a young man who will be eighteen years old in August 2013. He has an intellectual disability as a result of having Down syndrome. He is the youngest of five children born to his parents DL and VG. H’s parents separated when he was five years old. He lived with his mother and siblings and spent weekend and holiday time with his father until February 2011 when Mr G insisted, against Ms L’s wishes, that H, then aged fifteen, live week about between the parents’ households. It was a year before the dispute over the arrangements for H was heard by the Federal Magistrate’s Court and the Court ordered that the week about living arrangement continue. The Court also ordered that the parents have shared parental responsibility for decisions relating to H other than decisions relating to health, education and vocational training, for which Ms L was ordered to have sole responsibility.

  2. Ms L and Mr G have each applied to the Tribunal to be appointed in advance sole guardian and sole administrator for H upon his attaining eighteen years of age.[1]

    CAPACITY

    [1]        Guardianship and Administration Act 2000 s 13.

  3. The first matter to be considered is whether H is likely to have impaired capacity[2] to make personal and financial decisions when he turns eighteen[3].

    [2] Ibid, Schedule 4.

    [3] Ibid, s 13(1)(a).

  4. A report has been provided by H’s GP Dr George Belonogoff that H has Down syndrome resulting in an intellectual disability which is congenital and stable. In the doctor’s view H is able to make only simple personal health care decisions.

Continue reading HFG

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
HFG [2013] QCAT 327
Case
[2013] QCAT 327
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The matter in the Queensland Civil and Administrative Tribunal involved a dispute over the guardianship and administration of a minor, HFG, born in August 1995. The primary issue was to determine the most appropriate person to be appointed as guardian and administrator for HFG, considering the conflict between the parents. The parents, DDL and the other parent, had differing views on who should be responsible for making decisions regarding HFG's personal and financial matters.

The Tribunal had to decide whether it was appropriate to appoint DDL as the guardian for HFG's personal matters, given the conflict with the other parent. Additionally, the Tribunal needed to determine the most suitable person to be appointed as the administrator for HFG's financial matters. The decision involved weighing the welfare of HFG against the conflicting interests of the parents. The Tribunal concluded that DDL was the most appropriate appointment for guardianship, while the Public Trustee of Queensland was the appropriate choice for administration.

The Tribunal found that appointing DDL as guardian for HFG's personal matters was in the best interest of HFG, considering the circumstances and the conflict between the parents. DDL was appointed as guardian for decisions related to health care, provision of services, employment, and education or training. The Tribunal also determined that the Public Trustee of Queensland was the most suitable person to be appointed as administrator for HFG's financial matters. The Tribunal's decision ensured that HFG's welfare was prioritised while taking into account the conflicting interests of the parents.

The final orders appointed DDL as the guardian for HFG's personal matters until August 2014, and the Public Trustee of Queensland as the administrator for HFG's financial matters until the same date. The Tribunal also directed the administrator to provide accounts when requested and dispensed with the requirement for the administrator to provide a financial management plan. This decision aimed to provide stability and clarity in HFG's personal and financial matters, considering the conflict between the parents.

Orders

Orders of the court

Guardianship:

1. DDL is appointed as guardian for HFG born August 1995 upon HFG turning 18 years, for decisions about the following personal matters:

(a) health care;

(b) provision of services;

(c) whether HFG works and, if so, the kind and place of work and employer;

(d) what education or training HFG undertakes.

2. This appointment remains current until

August 2014.

Administration:

3. The Public Trustee of Queensland is

appointed as administrator for HFG born August 1995 upon HFG turning 18 years, for all financial matters.

4. The Tribunal dispenses with the

requirement for the administrator to

provide a financial management plan.

5. The Tribunal directs the administrator to

provide accounts to the administrator

when requested.

6. This appointment remains current until

August 2014.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.