FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| HEWETT & JOHNSON & ANOR | [2012] FMCAfam 1079 |
| CHILD SUPPORT – Application – overpayment of child support – whether a gift to the payee – whether payer intended overpayment to be credited against ongoing liability for child support – declaratory relief – delay – whether excessive and unwarranted delay – discretion of the court. |
| Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988, ss.30, 67, 74, 75 |
| Applicant: | MR HEWETT |
| First Respondent: | MS JOHNSON |
| Second Respondent: | CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR |
| File Number: | SYC 2549 of 2010 |
| Judgment of: | Scarlett FM |
| Hearing dates: | 13 March, 5 June 2012 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 5 June 2012 |
| Delivered at: | Sydney |
| Delivered on: | 9 October 2012 |
REPRESENTATION
| Solicitor for the Applicant: | Mr Benetatos |
| Solicitors for the Applicant: | Benetatos White |
| Counsel for the first Respondent: | In person |
| Solicitors for the first Respondent: | No solicitor |
| Counsel for the second Respondent: | Mr Kaplan |
| Solicitors for the second Respondent: | Sparke Helmore |
ORDERS
Order 1 made on 7 December 2010 is discharged.
The Second Respondent Child Support Registrar reduce the amount of child support calculated as being due and payable by the Applicant by the sum of $12,985.43 with effect from 2 December 2004.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Hewett & Johnson & Anor is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
| FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY |
SYC 2549 of 2010
| MR HEWETT |
Applicant
And
| MS JOHNSON |
First Respondent
| CHILD SUPPORT REGISTRAR |
Second Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Application
This is an Application by the payer of child support to reduce the amount calculated as owing by an amount of $12,985.43. The Application is opposed by the First Respondent, the payee, and the Second Respondent, the Child Support Registrar. The child support relates to the daughter of the Applicant and the First Respondent, who was born [in] 1997 and is now 15 years of age.
On 7th December 2010 orders in respect of arrears of child support and late payment penalties were stayed to the extent of $19,560.34.
Background
On 27th April 2010 the Child Support Registrar filed a summons against the Applicant, claiming that he was indebted to the Commonwealth under s.30 of the Child Support (Registration and Collection) Act 1988 for an amount of $25,845.59 by way of arrears of child support payments and an amount of $8,129.02 by way of late payment penalties under s.67 of the Act.
On 7th June 2010 the Applicant and the Child Support Registrar entered into consent orders:
a)declaring that the Applicant (who is the Respondent in the summons brought by the Child Support Registrar) owed the sum of $35,571.34 consisting of arrears of $26,956.43 and late payment penalties of $8,614.91;
b)the Applicant…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Hewett and Johnson and Anor and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2012] FMCAfam 1079
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was whether the Child Support Registrar's calculation of the child support liability was correct or if there were errors that warranted a reduction in the amount deemed payable. Specifically, the Applicant argued that the Registrar had incorrectly calculated the income of the Second Respondent, leading to an overestimation of the child support liability. The court had to assess the evidence and arguments presented by both parties to determine the accuracy of the Registrar's assessment and the appropriate adjustments, if any, to the child support amount.
The court examined the evidence and submissions from both parties, focusing on the income details of the Second Respondent and the corresponding child support calculations. It found that there were errors in the Registrar's assessment, leading to an overestimation of the child support liability. Consequently, the court ruled that the amount of child support calculated as being due and payable by the Applicant should be reduced by $12,985.43, effective from 2 December 2004. The court also discharged Order 1 made on 7 December 2010, reflecting its determination.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
Order 1 made on 7 December 2010 is discharged.
2.
The Second Respondent Child Support Registrar reduce the amount of child support calculated as being due and payable by the Applicant by the sum of $12,985.43 with effect from 2 December 2004.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.