Henson & Marlin (No 5)

Link copied
Case Copied 20 min read

FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

(DIVISION 1)

Henson & Marlin (No 5) [2024] FedCFamC1F 908

File number(s): BRC 10186 of 2020
Judgment of: HOGAN J
Date of judgment: 20 December 2024
Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Where the applicant sought a stay of final orders pending hearing of his appeal – Where compliance with the final order has the real risk of rendering the appeal nugatory –Where a conditional stay is granted pending appeal – Where orders are made for the applicant to ensure the removal of unlawful occupants from a property subject of the final orders, and for the applicant to secure the property and provide proof of that to the respondent’s legal representatives – Where the applicant is to pay the respondent weekly spousal maintenance – Where the applicant is restrained from dealing with property  
Legislation:

Family Law Act 1975 (Cth)

Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth)

Cases cited: Aldridge & Keaton [2009] FamCAFC 106
Division: First Instance
Number of paragraphs: 38
Date of hearing: 20 December 2024
Place: Brisbane
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr Hackett of Counsel
Solicitor for the Applicant: Hirst & Co
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr Drysdale of King’s Counsel
Solicitor for the Respondent: KLM Solicitors

ORDERS

BRC 10186 of 2020

FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA (DIVISION 1)

BETWEEN:

MR MARLIN

Applicant

AND:

MS HENSON

Respondent

ORDER MADE BY:

HOGAN J

DATE OF ORDER:

20 DECEMBER 2024

THE COURT ORDERS UNTIL FURTHER ORDER THAT:

1.Orders, 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 11, 12 and 14 of the Final Orders made on 25 October 2024 are stayed pending the determination of the Amended Notice of Appeal filed by Mr Marlin on 18 December 2024, on the conditions that:

(a)within forty-eight (48) hours, Mr Marlin take all necessary steps to:

(i)ensure the removal of all unlawful occupants of the real property situated at 2 DD Street, Suburb FF; and thereafter

(ii)secure the real property at 2 DD Street, Suburb FF; and

(iii)provide Ms Henson’s legal representatives with confirmation, by way of photographs, that this has occurred.

(b)Mr Marlin pay Ms Henson the sum of $553 per week by way of periodic spousal maintenance, with the first payment to be made on 21 December 2024 into an account nominated by Ms Henson and with such sum to be paid each Saturday thereafter; and

(c)Mr Marlin be restrained and an injunction issue restraining him from:

(i)encumbering any real property/ies owned by him personally, or taking any steps to cause any corporate entity under his control to encumber any real property, without the prior written consent of the respondent; and

(i)giving any notice or seeking or consenting to any order, either in his personal capacity or in his capacity as a director of any entity (either in relation to that entity itself or in its capacity as corporate trustee of any trust), that affects any real property/ies; and

(ii)making any agreement, either in his personal capacity or…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Henson & Marlin (No 5) and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2024] FedCFamC1F 908
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia heard an application by Mr Marlin for a stay of final orders made against him in a family law matter. The final orders, made on 25 October 2024, related to the division of property, spousal maintenance, and the removal of unlawful occupants from a property. Mr Marlin sought the stay pending the determination of his appeal against those orders. The court was required to decide whether a stay of the final orders was warranted and, if so, what conditions should accompany such a stay.

The court considered the risk that compliance with the final orders would render the appeal nugatory. Hogan J concluded that the appeal had a real prospect of success and that compliance with the final orders would indeed risk rendering the appeal ineffective. The court found that a conditional stay was appropriate to protect Mr Marlin's interests while ensuring that Ms Henson was not unduly prejudiced. The court imposed conditions for the stay, including the removal of unlawful occupants from the property, securing the property, and providing photographic evidence of these actions to Ms Henson's legal representatives. Additionally, Mr Marlin was required to pay spousal maintenance to Ms Henson and was restrained from dealing with any real property owned by him or any corporate entity under his control without Ms Henson's consent.

The court ordered that specific final orders were to be stayed until the appeal was determined, subject to the conditions outlined above. The court also provided detailed procedures for any future applications for costs related to the appeal. The orders ensured that the interests of both parties were protected while the appeal was being heard.

In summary, the court granted a conditional stay of certain final orders pending the outcome of Mr Marlin's appeal, with specific conditions to protect Ms Henson's interests. The court's decision balanced the need to preserve the appeal's potential success with the necessity to ensure that Ms Henson was not unduly prejudiced during the appeal process.

Orders

Orders of the court

BRC 10186 of 2020

FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA (DIVISION 1)

BETWEEN:

MR MARLIN

Applicant

AND:

MS HENSON

Respondent

ORDER MADE BY:

HOGAN J

DATE OF ORDER:

20 DECEMBER 2024

THE COURT ORDERS UNTIL FURTHER ORDER THAT:

1. Orders, 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 11, 12 and 14 of the Final Orders made on 25 October 2024 are stayed pending the determination of the Amended Notice of Appeal filed by Mr Marlin on 18 December 2024, on the conditions that:

(a) within forty-eight (48) hours, Mr Marlin take all necessary steps to:

(i) ensure the removal of all unlawful occupants of the real property situated at 2 DD Street, Suburb FF; and thereafter

(ii) secure the real property at 2 DD Street, Suburb FF; and

(iii) provide Ms Henson’s legal representatives with confirmation, by way of photographs, that this has occurred.

(b) Mr Marlin pay Ms Henson the sum of $553 per week by way of periodic spousal maintenance, with the first payment to be made on 21 December 2024 into an account nominated by Ms Henson and with such sum to be paid each Saturday thereafter; and

(c) Mr Marlin be restrained and an injunction issue restraining him from:

(i) encumbering any real property/ies owned by him personally, or taking any steps to cause any corporate entity under his control to encumber any real property, without the prior written consent of the respondent; and

(i) giving any notice or seeking or consenting to any order, either in his personal capacity or in his capacity as a director of any entity (either in relation to that entity itself or in its capacity as corporate trustee of any trust), that affects any real property/ies; and

(ii) making any agreement, either in his personal capacity or in his capacity as a director of any entity (either in relation to that entity itself or in its capacity as corporate trustee of any trust), affecting real property/ies; and

(iii) otherwise dealing with any real property/ies, either in his personal capacity or causing any corporate entity (whether for that entity itself or in its capacity as corporate trustee of any trust) to deal with any real property/ies in any way.

2. In the event that any party seeks an order that another party pay the costs of and incidental to the Application in a Proceeding sealed 5 December 2024:

(a) any such party shall, within twenty-eight (28) days of the finalisation of the appeal, file and serve:

(i) any affidavit necessary to support such application; and

(ii) written submissions in support of such application for costs; and

(b) the party against whom an order for costs is sought shall, within a further fourteen (14) days thereafter, file and serve:

(i) any affidavit necessary for the determination of any such application for costs; and

(ii) any written submissions in answer to the submissions filed and served by the party seeking an order for costs; and

(c) the party seeking an order for costs shall, within seven (7) days of being served with the submissions relied on by the party against whom an order for costs is sought, file and serve any further written submissions, strictly in reply, to the submissions served by the party against whom an order for costs is sought,

and any such application for costs shall be considered in Chambers.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.