Henry Richard Dimer & Ors on behalf of Marlinyu Ghoorlie v Leo Glenn Fleming and Others
[2024] NNTTA 75
•26 September 2024
NATIONAL NATIVE TITLE TRIBUNAL
Henry Richard Dimer & Ors on behalf of Marlinyu Ghoorlie v Leo Glenn Fleming and Others [2024] NNTTA 75 (26 September 2024)
Application No: | WO2024/0421; WO2024/0422; WO2024/0426 |
IN THE MATTER of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth)
- and -
IN THE MATTER of an inquiry into expedited procedure objection applications
Henry Richard Dimer & Ors on behalf of Marlinyu Ghoorlie (WC2017/007)
(native title party)
- and -
See attached Schedule
(grantee parties)
- and -
State of Western Australia
(Government party)
DECISION TO DISMISS OBJECTION APPLICATIONS
Tribunal: | Ms Nerida Cooley |
Place: | Brisbane |
Date: | 26 September 2024 |
Catchwords: | Native title – future acts – proposed grant of prospecting licences – expedited procedure objection applications – failure to comply with directions – expedited procedure objection applications dismissed |
Legislation: | Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) ss 32, 139, 148 |
| Representative of the native title party: | Parsa Ardestani, Houston Legal |
| Representatives of the grantee parties: | Leo Fleming (for WO2024/0421-0422); and Derek Bonney (for WO2024/0426) |
| Representative of the Government party: | Paola O’Neill, Department of Energy, Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety |
REASONS FOR DECISION
This is a decision to dismiss three expedited procedure objection applications made by the registered native title claimant for native title determination application WAD647/2017 (Marlinyu Ghoorlie). I am dealing with these matters together because the facts are similar.
Each objection application listed in the Schedule relates to the grant of the corresponding prospecting licence, which the State of Western Australia asserts is an act attracting the expedited procedure under the Native Title Act1993 (Cth). The Tribunal’s role is to conduct an inquiry and determine whether or not the expedited procedure applies: ss 32(4) and 139 Native Title Act.
At conferences on 11 July 2024, I made directions for the conduct of the Tribunal’s inquiry in each matter, under which Marlinyu Ghoorlie’s materials were due by 2 September 2024. However, as has repeatedly been the case, Marlinyu Ghoorlie neither complied by the due date nor sought an extension of time. About a week after Marlinyu Ghoorlie’s compliance date, the Tribunal advised the parties in each matter that the application was at risk of dismissal. Marlinyu Ghoorlie was afforded a further week to provide reasons for its failure to comply and request any further time. It did not respond.
The Tribunal may dismiss an objection application at any stage of the inquiry in circumstances where the native title party fails within a reasonable time to proceed with the application or to comply with a direction of the Tribunal: s 148(b) Native Title Act. On the facts of these matters, I am satisfied that Marlinyu Ghoorlie’s applications should be dismissed.
Decision
The expedited procedure objection applications listed in the attached Schedule are dismissed under s 148(b) of the Native Title Act.
Ms Nerida Cooley
Member
26 September 2024
SCHEDULE
| Objection Application No. | Prospecting Licence No. | Grantee Party |
| WO2024/0421 | P 24/5722 | Leo Glenn Fleming |
| WO2024/0422 | P 25/2794 | Leo Glenn Fleming |
| WO2024/0426 | P 24/5713 | Derek Neil Bonney |
0
0
0