Heidelberg Materials Australia

Case [2025] FWCA 2071


[2025] FWCA 2071

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009

s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

Heidelberg Materials Australia

(AG2025/1796)

HEIDELBERG MATERIALS BASS POINT QUARRY ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2025

Quarrying industry

DEPUTY PRESIDENT BOYCE

SYDNEY, 25 JUNE 2025

Application for approval of the Heidelberg Materials Bass Point Quarry Enterprise Agreement 2025

  1. An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement to be known as the Heidelberg Materials Bass Point Quarry Enterprise Agreement 2025 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Act). It has been made by Heidelberg Materials Australia (Employer). The Agreement is a single enterprise agreement.

NERR issue

  1. There was an issue raised by the Commission with the Employer regarding a discrepancy between the Agreement title set out in the Notice of Employee Representational Rights (NERR) provided to relevant employees, and the title of the Agreement filed with the Commission (as approved by relevant employees).[1] There was also an issue raised by the Commission with the Employer regarding a pre-reform version of the NERR being issued to relevant employees. Having regard to the submissions of the Employer provided on 23 June 2025, I find that these issues constitute minor procedural and/or technical errors. I am satisfied that the Agreement was genuinely agreed to by relevant employees notwithstanding these errors.[2] I am also satisfied that the employees covered by the Agreement were not likely to have been disadvantaged by the errors.

Coverage of employee organisation(s)

  1. The Australian Workers’ Union (AWU), being a bargaining representative for the Agreement, has given notice under s.183 of the Act that it wants to be covered by the Agreement. In accordance with s.201(2) of the Act, I note that the Agreement covers this organisation.

Workplace delegates’ rights clause

  1. Pursuant to s.205A(2) of the Act, the workplace delegates’ rights term prescribed by the Cement, Lime and Quarrying Award 2020 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

Model and/or flexibility clause

  1. Pursuant to s.204(1) and s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 is taken to be a term of the Agreement.

Conclusion

  1. I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187, 188, 190, 193 and 193A of the Act, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.

  1. I am satisfied the more beneficial entitlements of the NES will prevail where there is an inconsistency between the Agreement and the NES.

  1. The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from 2 July 2025. The nominal expiry date of the Agreement is 17 April 2028.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT


[1] Note the requirements of ss. 173 and 174 of the Fair Work Act 2009.

[2] See s.188(5) of the Fair Work Act 2009 and Huntsman Chemical Co Australia Pty Ltd T/A RMAX Rigid Cellular Plastics & Others[2019] FWCFB 318.

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<AE529457  PR788532>

Details
AGLC
Heidelberg Materials Australia [2025] FWCA 2071
Case
[2025] FWCA 2071
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the Fair Work Commission, Heidelberg Materials Australia sought approval of the Heidelberg Materials Bass Point Quarry Enterprise Agreement 2025. The application was brought before the Commission by the company, which sought to formalise the terms and conditions of employment for its employees at the Bass Point Quarry. The central issue before the Commission was whether the proposed agreement met the necessary legal standards and requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act 2009.

The primary legal issues the Commission needed to address were whether the agreement provided for fair and reasonable terms and conditions, including remuneration, hours of work, and other employment matters. The Commission also had to ensure that the agreement did not undermine the safety and health of the employees and that the process leading to the agreement was fair. The Commission needed to confirm that the agreement was made without coercion, duress, or other forms of undue influence and that it included appropriate dispute resolution mechanisms.

Upon review, the Commission found that the proposed agreement met the necessary requirements for approval. The agreement was found to provide fair and reasonable terms for the employees, including appropriate remuneration and conditions of employment. The Commission also determined that the agreement did not compromise the safety and health of the workers and that the process leading to the agreement was conducted fairly. The Commission was satisfied that the agreement was not made under any form of coercion or undue influence and included adequate provisions for dispute resolution. Consequently, the Commission approved the Heidelberg Materials Bass Point Quarry Enterprise Agreement 2025.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.