(3) The authorised person may use reasonable force in complying with the direction to run the engine or when acting under the authority of section 40(8) to run the engine. (4) It is immaterial that the authorised person does not have the authority of the registered operator to run the engine. (5) The authorised person is, in complying with the direction to run the engine or when acting under the authority of section 40(8) to run the engine, exempt from any other road law to the extent that the other law would require him or her to be licensed or otherwise authorised to do so. 42Manner of giving directions under this Division (1) A direction under this Division may be given orally, in writing or in any other manner. (2) A direction not given in person may be sent or transmitted by post, telephone, facsimile, electronic mail, radio or in any other manner. 43Directions to state when to be complied with (1) If given orally, a direction under this Division must state whether it is to be complied with immediately or within a specified period. (2) If given in writing, a direction under this Division must specify the period within which it is to be complied with. Division 6Warrants44Warrants (1) This section applies where an officer believes on reasonable grounds that – (a) there may be at particular premises, then or within the next 72 hours, records, devices or other things that may provide evidence of an Australian road law offence; or (b) a vehicle or combination has been or may have been involved in an incident involving death or personal injury or damage to property and – (i) the vehicle or combination is or has been located at particular premises; or (ii) particular premises are or may be otherwise connected (directly or indirectly) with the vehicle or combination or any part of its equipment or load. (2) The officer may apply to a magistrate for a warrant authorising the officer to exercise a power to enter and search the premises under section 36 . (3) A search warrant authorises an officer – (a) to enter premises; and (b) to search premises in accordance with section 36 ; and (c) to seize any property found in the course of the search that the officer believes, on reasonable grounds, provides evidence of an Australian road law offence of the kind specified in the warrant. (4) Nothing in this section limits any other statutory law relating to search warrants. (5) Schedule 1 has effect in relation to the issue, execution, effect and expiry of warrants for the purposes of this section. Division 7Other provisions regarding inspections and searches45Use of assistants and equipment (1) An officer may exercise powers under this Part with the aid of such assistants and equipment as the officer considers reasonably necessary in the circumstances. (2) Powers that may be exercised by an officer under this Part may be exercised by an assistant authorised and supervised by the officer, but only if the officer considers that it is reasonably necessary in the circumstances that an assistant exercise the powers. 46Use of equipment to examine or process things (1) Without limiting section 45 (Use of assistants and equipment), an officer exercising a power under this Part may bring to, or on to, a vehicle, combination or premises any equipment reasonably necessary for the examination or processing of things found in, on or at the vehicle, combination or premises in order to determine whether they are things that may be seized. (2) If – (a) it is not practicable to examine or process the things at the vehicle, combination or premises; or (b) the occupier of the vehicle, combination or premises consents in writing – the things may be moved to another place so that the examination or processing can be carried out in order to determine whether they are things that may be seized. (3) The officer, or a person assisting the officer, may operate equipment already in, on or at the vehicle, combination or premises to carry out the examination or processing of a thing found in, on or at the vehicle, combination or premises in order to determine whether it is a thing that may be seized, if the officer or person assisting believes on reasonable grounds that – (a) the equipment is suitable for the examination or processing; and (b) the examination or processing can be carried out without damage to the equipment or the thing. 47Use or seizure of electronic equipment (1) If – (a) a thing found by an officer in, on or at a vehicle, combination or premises is, or includes, a disk, tape or other device for the storage of information; and (b) equipment in, on or at the vehicle, combination or premises may be used with the disk, tape or other storage device; and (c) the officer concerned believes on reasonable grounds that the information stored on the disk, tape or other storage device is relevant to determine whether an Australian road law or approved road transport compliance scheme has been contravened – the officer or a person assisting the officer may operate the equipment to access the information. (2) If the officer or a person assisting the officer finds that a disk, tape or other storage device in, on or at the vehicle, combination or premises contains information of a kind referred to in subsection (1)(c) , he or she may – (a) put the information in documentary form and seize the documents so produced; or (b) copy the information to another disk, tape or other storage device and remove that storage device from the vehicle, combination or premises; or (c) if it is not practicable to put the information in documentary form or to copy the information, seize the disk, tape or other storage device and the equipment that enables the information to be accessed. (3) An officer or a person assisting an officer must not operate or seize equipment for the purpose referred to in this section unless the officer or person assisting believes on reasonable grounds that the operation or seizure of the equipment can be carried out without damage to the equipment. Division 8Other provisions regarding seizure48Receipt for and access to seized materialIf a record, device or other thing is seized and removed under this Part, the officer concerned must – (a) give a receipt for it to the person from whom it is seized and removed; and (b) if practicable, allow the person who would normally be entitled to possession of it reasonable access to it. 49Embargo notices (1) This section applies where – (a) an officer is authorised to seize any record, device or other thing under this Part; and (b) the record, device or other thing cannot, or cannot readily, be physically seized and removed. (2) The officer may issue an embargo notice under this section. (3) An "embargo notice" is a notice forbidding the movement, sale, leasing, transfer, deletion of information from or other dealing with the record, device or other thing, or any part of it, without the written consent of the officer, the Authority or the Commissioner of Police. (4) The embargo notice – (a) must be in the form, or contain the particulars, required by the regulations; and (b) must list the activities that it forbids; and (c) must set out a copy of subsection (8) . (5) The officer may issue the embargo notice – (a) by causing a copy of the notice to be served on the occupier of the vehicle, combination or premises concerned; or (b) if that person cannot be located after all reasonable steps have been taken to do so, by affixing a copy of the notice to the record, device or other thing in a prominent position. (6) A person commits an offence if – (a) the person knows that an embargo notice relates to a record, device or other thing; and (b) the person – (i) does anything that is forbidden by the embargo notice under this section; or (ii) instructs any other person to do anything that is forbidden by the embargo notice under this section or to do anything that the person is forbidden to do by the notice. Penalty: In the case of –
(a) an individual, a fine not exceeding 80 penalty units; or (b) a body corporate, a fine not exceeding 400 penalty units. (7) It is a defence in proceedings for an offence against subsection (6) if the defendant establishes that he or she – (a) moved the record, device or other thing, or part of it, for the purpose of protecting or preserving it; and (b) notified the officer who issued the embargo notice of the move, and of the new location of the record, device or other thing or part of it, within 48 hours after the move. (8) A person commits an offence if – (a) an embargo notice has been served on the person; and (b) the person fails to take reasonable steps to prevent any other person from doing anything forbidden by the notice. Penalty: In the case of –
(a) an individual, a fine not exceeding 80 penalty units; or (b) a body corporate, a fine not exceeding 400 penalty units. (9) Despite anything in any other Act, a sale, lease or transfer or other dealing with a record, device or other thing, or part of it, in contravention of this section is void. (10) Subject to subsection (7) , an offence against this section is an offence of strict liability. Division 9Miscellaneous50Power to use force against persons to be exercised only by police officersA provision of this Part that authorises a person to use reasonable force does not authorise a person who is not a police officer to use force against a person. 51Consent (1) Before obtaining the consent of a person for the purposes of a provision of this Part, the officer concerned must inform the person that he or she may refuse to give consent. (2) An entry by or the exercise of any other power under this Part by an officer by virtue of the consent of a person is not lawful unless the person voluntarily consented to the entry. (3) Consent may be withdrawn after it has been given, and if it is withdrawn the power concerned must no longer be exercised by virtue of the consent. 52Directions may be given under more than one provision (1) An officer may, on the same occasion, give directions under one or more provisions of this Part. (2) Without limiting the above, an officer may, in the course of exercising powers under a provision of this Part, give – (a) further directions under the provision; or (b) directions under one or more other provisions of this Part – or both. 53Restoring vehicle, combination or premises to original condition after action takenIf – (a) an officer or a person authorised by the officer takes any action in the exercise or purported exercise of any power under this Part in relation to a vehicle or combination or its equipment or load or in relation to any premises; and (b) damage is caused by the unreasonable exercise of the power or by the use of force that was not authorised under this Part – the officer must take reasonable steps to return the vehicle, combination, equipment, load or premises to the condition it was in immediately before the action was taken. 54Self-incrimination no excuse (1) Subject to subsections (2) and (3) – (a) a person is not excused from producing a record, or a device or other thing that contains or may contain a record, under section 38 (Direction to produce records, devices or other things) on the ground that it (or the information in it) might incriminate the person; and (b) a person is not excused from providing any information under section 39 (Direction to provide information) on the ground that the information might incriminate the person; and (c) a person is not excused from providing any assistance under section 40 (Direction to provide reasonable assistance for powers of inspection and search) on the ground that the assistance may result in information being provided that might incriminate the person. (2) It is a defence in proceedings for an offence of failing to comply with a direction under section 39 or 40 if the defendant establishes that – (a) the defendant, in complying with the direction, would have been required to answer a question; and (b) the defendant objected to complying with the direction on the ground that the answer might incriminate the defendant; and (c) there were reasonable grounds for the objection. (3) It is a defence in proceedings for an offence of failing to comply with a direction under section 38 , 39 or 40 if the defendant establishes that – (a) the defendant, in complying with the direction, would have been required – (i) to locate, identify or reveal the whereabouts of a record; or (ii) to explain the contents of a record; and (b) the defendant had objected to complying with the direction on the ground that the record (or the information in it) might incriminate the defendant; and (c) there were reasonable grounds for the objection. (4) Subsection (2) does not apply – (a) to a body corporate; or (b) in relation to – (i) a record that is required to be kept by law; or (ii) any information in such a record – whether or not the record has been kept properly or has been kept at all. (5) Subsection (3) does not apply – (a) to a body corporate; or (b) in relation to – (i) a record that is required to be kept by law; or (ii) any information in such a record – whether or not the record has been kept properly or has been kept at all; or (c) in relation to locating, identifying or revealing the whereabouts of a record, or a record of a class, that was specifically identified in the direction concerned. 55Providing evidence to other authorities (1) Any records, devices or other things seized under this Act, or any information obtained under this Act, may, for the purposes of law enforcement, be given to any public authority of any jurisdiction (including any corresponding Authority) considered appropriate by the Authority or the Commissioner of Police, but only after consultation with the public authority concerned. (2) This section has effect subject to the Personal Information Protection Act 2004 . 56Obstructing or hindering officers (1) Subject to subsection (2) , a person commits an offence if – (a) an officer is exercising a power under this Act; and (b) the person obstructs or hinders the officer in the exercise of the power. Penalty: In the case of –
(a) an individual, a fine not exceeding 80 penalty units; or (b) a body corporate, a fine not exceeding 400 penalty units. (2) An offence is not committed under this section in relation to a power under Division 4 unless it is established that the power – (a) was being exercised lawfully; and (b) without limiting paragraph (a) , was – (i) exercisable without consent; or (ii) being exercised under the authority of a warrant. (3) The onus of proof of a matter set out in subsection (2) lies on the prosecution in proceedings for an offence under this section. (4) An offence against subsection (1) is an offence of strict liability. 57Impersonating authorised officers (1) A person commits an offence if the person impersonates an authorised officer.Penalty: Fine not exceeding 100 penalty units.
(2) An offence against subsection (1) is an offence of strict liability. PART 4Mass, Dimension and Load Restraint RequirementsDivision 1Preliminary58Purpose and operation of this Part (1) The principal purpose of this Part is to make provision for compliance with, and enforcement of, Australian road laws in circumstances where a load is or may be a factor in a breach or apprehended breach of a mass, dimension or load restraint requirement. (2) Except where expressly provided, nothing in this Part limits the operation of other Parts of this Act, or any other road laws, in relation to a breach or apprehended breach of a mass, dimension or load restraint requirement. Note A laden vehicle or combination could also be subject to compliance and enforcement provisions of other road laws because the vehicle or combination might contravene legislative provisions regarding mass or dimension even when the load is disregarded. 59DefinitionsFor the purposes of this Part – container weight declaration means a declaration referred to in Division 7 of Part 4 , and includes a copy of such a declaration or a version of such a declaration in electronic or other form; minor risk breach of a mass, dimension or load restraint requirement – see section 61 ; reasonable steps defence – see sections 69 and 70 ; severe risk breach of a mass, dimension or load restraint requirement – see section 61 ; substantial risk breach of a mass, dimension or load restraint requirement – see section 61 . 60Determining whether a breach involves riskFor the purposes of this Part, in determining whether or not a breach of a mass, dimension or load restraint requirement involves an appreciable risk of harm to public safety, the environment, road infrastructure or public amenity, regard is to be had to – (a) the nature and severity of the breach; and (b) the consequences or likely consequences of the breach; and (c) any other relevant factors. Division 2Categorisation of breaches61Meaning of minor, substantial or severe risk breachesFor the purposes of this Act, a breach of a mass, dimension or load restraint requirement is a – (a) minor risk breach if the breach is categorised as a minor risk breach under the regulations; or (b) substantial risk breach if the breach is categorised as a substantial risk breach under the regulations; or (c) severe risk breach if the breach is categorised as a severe risk breach under the regulations. Division 3Enforcement powers Note The enforcement powers provided by this Division vary according to the risk category involved. The principal features are as follows: Minor risk breaches The officer may authorise the driver to continue the journey (conditionally or unconditionally), but in particular circumstances the officer may direct the driver to rectify breaches then and there or to move the vehicle or combination to a suitable location (within a limited distance) and not proceed until breaches are rectified. Substantial risk breaches The officer must direct the driver not to proceed until breaches are rectified, but in particular circumstances (or acting under particular instructions) the officer may direct the driver to move the vehicle or combination to the nearest suitable location and not proceed until breaches are rectified. Severe risk breaches The officer must direct the driver not to proceed until breaches are rectified, but in limited particular circumstances (or acting under particular instructions) the officer may direct the driver to move the vehicle or combination to the nearest safe location and not proceed until breaches are rectified.Directions may instead be given to the operator of the vehicle or combination, who is required to ensure that the direction is carried out. 62Minor risk breaches (1) This section applies to a vehicle or combination, where an officer believes on reasonable grounds that – (a) the vehicle or combination is the subject of one or more minor risk breaches of mass, dimension or load restraint requirements; and (b) the vehicle or combination is not the subject of a substantial risk breach or a severe risk breach. (2) The officer may – (a) if the officer does not give a direction under paragraph (b) , authorise the driver of the vehicle or combination to continue its journey under section 65 (Authorisation to continue journey where only minor risk breaches); or (b) if the officer believes on reasonable grounds that particular circumstances exist warranting the giving of a direction under this paragraph, direct the driver or operator of the vehicle or combination – (i) to rectify specified breaches of mass, dimension or load restraint requirements then and there; or (ii) if the officer also believes on reasonable grounds that the vehicle or combination should be moved to another location, to move it or cause it to be moved to a specified suitable location that is within the prescribed distance, and not to proceed from there until specified breaches of mass, dimension or load restraint requirements are rectified. Note Section 65 enables the officer to permit the vehicle or combination to continue its journey (conditionally or unconditionally) if only minor risk breaches exist and no direction to rectify the breaches has been given or remains in force. (3) Without limiting the above, particular circumstances warranting the giving of a direction exist where – (a) rectification is reasonable and can be carried out easily; or (b) rectification is necessary in the public interest to avoid potential risk of harm to public safety, the environment, road infrastructure or public amenity. (4) A direction may be given under this section unconditionally or subject to conditions imposed by the officer. (5) A person commits an offence if – (a) the person is subject to a direction under subsection (2) ; and (b) the person engages in conduct that results in a contravention of the direction. Penalty: In the case of –
(a) an individual – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 30 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine not less than 12 penalty units and not exceeding 60 penalty units; or (b) a body corporate – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 150 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine not less than 12 penalty units and not exceeding 300 penalty units. (6) A person commits an offence if – (a) the person is subject to a direction under subsection (2) ; and (b) the direction is subject to a condition; and (c) the person engages in conduct that results in a contravention of the condition. Penalty: In the case of –
(a) an individual – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 30 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine not less than 12 penalty units and not exceeding 60 penalty units; or (b) a body corporate – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 150 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine not less than 12 penalty units and not exceeding 300 penalty units. (7) An offence against this section is an offence of strict liability. 63Substantial risk breaches (1) This section applies to a vehicle or combination, where an officer believes on reasonable grounds that – (a) the vehicle or combination is the subject of one or more substantial risk breaches; and (b) the vehicle or combination is not the subject of a severe risk breach. (2) The officer must – (a) direct the driver or operator of the vehicle or combination not to proceed until specified breaches of mass, dimension or load restraint requirements are rectified; or (b) if the officer believes on reasonable grounds that – (i) particular circumstances exist warranting the moving of the vehicle or combination to another location; or (ii) particular instructions have been given authorising or requiring the moving of the vehicle or combination to another location – direct the driver or operator of the vehicle or combination to move it or cause it to be moved to the nearest suitable location as specified by the officer, and not to proceed from there until specified breaches of mass, dimension or load restraint requirements are rectified. (3) Without limiting the above, particular circumstances warranting the moving of a vehicle or combination exist where moving the vehicle or combination is necessary in the public interest to avoid potential risk of harm to public safety, the environment, road infrastructure or public amenity. (4) Particular instructions authorising or requiring the moving of a vehicle or combination are specific instructions or standing instructions given by the Authority (orally or in writing, or by telephone, facsimile, electronic mail or radio, or in any other manner) authorising or requiring the moving of the vehicle or combination in the relevant circumstances. (5) A direction may be given under this section unconditionally or subject to conditions imposed by the officer. (6) A person commits an offence if – (a) the person is subject to a direction under subsection (2) ; and (b) the person engages in conduct that results in a contravention of the direction. Penalty: In the case of –
(a) an individual – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 30 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine not less than 12 penalty units and not exceeding 60 penalty units; or (b) a body corporate – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 150 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine not less than 12 penalty units and not exceeding 300 penalty units. (7) A person commits an offence if – (a) the person is subject to a direction under subsection (2) ; and (b) the direction is subject to a condition; and (c) the person engages in conduct that results in a contravention of the condition. Penalty: In the case of –
(a) an individual – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 30 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine not less than 12 penalty units and not exceeding 60 penalty units; or (b) a body corporate – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 150 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine not less than 12 penalty units and not exceeding 300 penalty units. (8) An offence against this section is an offence of strict liability. 64Severe risk breaches (1) This section applies to a vehicle or combination, where an officer believes on reasonable grounds that the vehicle or combination is the subject of one or more severe risk breaches. (2) The officer must – (a) direct the driver or operator of the vehicle or combination not to proceed until specified breaches of mass, dimension or load restraint requirements are rectified; or (b) if the officer believes on reasonable grounds that – (i) particular circumstances exist warranting the moving of the vehicle or combination to another location; or (ii) particular instructions have been given authorising or requiring the moving of the vehicle or combination to another location – direct the driver or operator of the vehicle or combination to move it or cause it to be moved to the nearest safe location as specified by the officer, and not to proceed from there until specified breaches of mass, dimension or load restraint requirements are rectified. (3) Particular circumstances warranting the moving of a vehicle or combination exist only – (a) where there is an appreciable risk of harm to public safety, the environment, road infrastructure or public amenity; or (b) where there is a risk to the welfare of people or live animals in or on the vehicle or combination. (4) Particular instructions authorising or requiring the moving of a vehicle or combination are specific instructions or standing instructions given by the Authority (orally or in writing, or by telephone, facsimile, electronic mail or radio, or in any other manner) authorising or requiring the moving of the vehicle or combination in the relevant circumstances. (5) A direction may be given under this section unconditionally or subject to conditions imposed by the officer. (6) A person commits an offence if – (a) the person is subject to a direction under subsection (2) ; and (b) the person engages in conduct that results in a contravention of the direction. Penalty: In the case of –
(a) an individual – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 30 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine not less than 12 penalty units and not exceeding 60 penalty units; or (b) a body corporate – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 150 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine not less than 12 penalty units and not exceeding 300 penalty units. (7) A person commits an offence if – (a) the person is subject to a direction under subsection (2) ; and (b) the direction is subject to a condition; and (c) the person engages in conduct that results in a contravention of the condition. Penalty: In the case of –
(a) an individual – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 30 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine not less than 12 penalty units and not exceeding 60 penalty units; or (b) a body corporate – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 150 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine not less than 12 penalty units and not exceeding 300 penalty units. (8) An offence against this section is an offence of strict liability. (9) In this section – risk of harm to public safety does not (subject to subsection (10) ) include risk of harm to the safety of the vehicle or combination or any load in or on it; safe location means a location that the officer believes on reasonable grounds poses a reduced risk or no appreciable risk of harm to public safety, the environment, road infrastructure or public amenity. Note Subsection (10) ensures that the officer may take excluded matters into account in particular circumstances. (10) Nothing in the definition of "risk of harm to public safety" in subsection (9) , or in any other provision of this section, prevents the officer from taking into account the safety of the vehicle or combination or any load in or on it if the officer believes on reasonable grounds he or she can do so without prejudicing the safety of other property or of people, the environment, road infrastructure or public amenity. 65Authorisation to continue journey where only minor risk breaches (1) This section applies to a vehicle or combination, where an officer believes on reasonable grounds that – (a) the vehicle or combination is the subject of one or more minor risk breaches of mass, dimension or load restraint requirements; and (b) the vehicle or combination is not or is no longer the subject of a substantial risk breach or a severe risk breach; and (c) the driver is not or is no longer the subject of a direction for the rectification of the minor risk breach or any of the minor risk breaches. (2) The officer may authorise the driver of the vehicle or combination to continue its journey. (3) An authorisation may be granted under this section unconditionally or subject to conditions imposed by the officer. (4) A person commits an offence if – (a) the person is granted an authorisation under this section; and (b) the authorisation is subject to a condition; and (c) the person engages in conduct that results in a contravention of the condition. Penalty: In the case of –
(a) an individual – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 30 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine not less than 12 penalty units and not exceeding 60 penalty units; or (b) a body corporate – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 150 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine not less than 12 penalty units and not exceeding 300 penalty units. (5) An offence against subsection (4) is an offence of strict liability. 66Operation of directions in relation to combinations (1) This section applies where a direction is given under this Division in relation to a combination. (2) Subject to subsection (3) , nothing in this Division prevents a component vehicle of the combination from being separately driven or moved if – (a) the component vehicle is not itself the subject of a breach of a mass, dimension or load restraint requirement; and (b) it is not otherwise unlawful for the component vehicle to be driven or moved. (3) Subsection (2) does not apply where a condition of the direction prevents the component vehicle from being separately driven or moved. (4) In this section – component vehicle of a combination means a towing vehicle or trailer of the combination. 67Directions and authorisations to be in writingA direction or authorisation under this Division is to be in writing, except – (a) in the case of a direction to move a vehicle or combination, where the moving is carried out in the presence of, or under the supervision of, an officer; or (b) in other circumstances prescribed by the regulations. 68Application of Division in relation to other directionsThis Division applies to a vehicle or combination regardless of whether or not the vehicle or combination is, has been or becomes the subject of a direction under Part 3 . Division 4Reasonable steps defence69Reasonable steps defence (1) If a provision of this Part states that a person has the benefit of the "reasonable steps defence" for an offence, it is a defence to a charge for the offence concerned if the person charged establishes that – (a) the person did not know, and could not reasonably be expected to have known, of the contravention concerned; and (b) either – (i) the person had taken all reasonable steps to prevent the contravention; or (ii) there were no steps that the person could reasonably be expected to have taken to prevent the contravention. (2) Without limiting the above, in determining whether things done or omitted to be done by the person charged constitute reasonable steps, a court may have regard to – (a) the circumstances of the alleged offence, including (where relevant) the risk category to which the breach concerned belongs; and (b) without limiting paragraph (a) , the measures available and measures taken for any or all of the following: (i) to accurately and safely weigh or measure the vehicle or combination or its load or to safely restrain the load in or on the vehicle or combination; (ii) to provide and obtain sufficient and reliable evidence from which the weight or measurement of the vehicle or combination or its load might be calculated; (iii) to manage, reduce or eliminate a potential breach arising from the location of the vehicle or combination, or from the location of the load in or on the vehicle or combination, or from the location of goods in the load; (iv) to manage, reduce or eliminate a potential breach arising from weather and climatic conditions, or from potential weather and climatic conditions, affecting or potentially affecting the weight or measurement of the load; (v) to exercise supervision or control over other persons involved in activities leading to the breach; and (c) the measures available and measures taken for any or all of the following: (i) to include compliance assurance conditions in relevant commercial arrangements with other responsible persons; (ii) to provide information, instruction, training and supervision to employees to enable compliance with relevant laws; (iii) to maintain equipment and work systems to enable compliance with relevant laws; (iv) to address and remedy similar compliance problems that may have occurred in the past; and (d) whether the person charged had, either personally or through an agent or employee, custody or control of the vehicle or combination, or of its load, or of any of the goods included or to be included in the load; and (e) the personal expertise and experience that the person charged had or ought to have had or that an agent or employee of the person charged had or ought to have had. (3) In this section – risk category means one of the following categories of offences: (a) minor risk breach; (b) substantial risk breach; (c) severe risk breach. 70Reasonable steps defence – reliance on container weight declaration (1) This section applies where the operator or driver of a vehicle or combination is charged with an offence involving a breach of a mass requirement and is seeking to establish the reasonable steps defence in relation to the offence. (2) To the extent that the weight of a freight container together with its contents is relevant to the offence, the person charged may rely on the weight stated in the relevant container weight declaration, unless it is established that the person knew or ought reasonably to have known that – (a) the stated weight was lower than the actual weight; or (b) the distributed weight of the container and its contents, together with – (i) the mass or location of any other load; or (ii) the mass of the vehicle or combination or any part of it – would cause one or more breaches of mass requirements. Division 5Liability for breaches of mass, dimension or load restraint requirements71Liability of consignor (1) A person commits an offence if – (a) a breach of a mass, dimension or load restraint requirement occurs; and (b) the person is the consignor of any goods that are in or on the vehicle or combination concerned. Penalty: In the case of –
(a) a minor risk breach of a mass requirement, Level 1 penalty; or (b) a substantial risk breach of a mass requirement, Level 2 penalty; or (c) a severe risk breach of a mass requirement, Level 3 penalty; or (d) a minor risk breach of a dimension or load restraint requirement, Level 4 penalty; or (e) a substantial risk breach of a dimension or load restraint requirement, Level 5 penalty; or (f) a severe risk breach of a dimension or load restraint requirement, Level 6 penalty. (2) A person commits an offence if – (a) the weight of a freight container containing goods consigned for road transport exceeds the maximum gross weight as marked on the container or on the container’s safety approval plate; and (b) the person is the consignor of any of the goods contained in the freight container. Penalty: In the case of –
(a) an individual – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 50 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine not less than 20 penalty units and not exceeding 100 penalty units; or (b) a body corporate – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 250 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine not less than 20 penalty units and not exceeding 500 penalty units. (3) Subject to subsection (4) , an offence against this section is an offence of absolute liability. (4) A person charged under this section has the benefit of the reasonable steps defence for an offence under this section. 72Liability of packer (1) A person commits an offence if – (a) a breach of a mass, dimension or load restraint requirement occurs; and (b) the person is the packer of any goods that are in or on the vehicle or combination concerned. Penalty: In the case of –
(a) a minor risk breach of a mass requirement, Level 1 penalty; or (b) a substantial risk breach of a mass requirement, Level 2 penalty; or (c) a severe risk breach of a mass requirement, Level 3 penalty; or (d) a minor risk breach of a dimension or load restraint requirement, Level 4 penalty; or (e) a substantial risk breach of a dimension or load restraint requirement, Level 5 penalty; or (f) a severe risk breach of a dimension or load restraint requirement, Level 6 penalty. (2) A person commits an offence if – (a) the weight of a freight container containing goods consigned for road transport exceeds the maximum gross weight as marked on the container or on the container’s safety approval plate; and (b) the person is the packer of any of the goods contained in the freight container. Penalty: In the case of –
(a) an individual – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 50 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine not less than 20 penalty units and not exceeding 100 penalty units; or (b) a body corporate – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 250 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine not less than 20 penalty units and not exceeding 500 penalty units. (3) Subject to subsection (4) , an offence against this section is an offence of absolute liability. (4) A person charged under this section has the benefit of the reasonable steps defence for an offence under this section. 73Liability of loader (1) A person commits an offence if – (a) a breach of a mass, dimension or load restraint requirement occurs; and (b) the person is the loader of any goods that are in or on the vehicle or combination concerned. Penalty: In the case of –
(a) a minor risk breach of a mass requirement, Level 1 penalty; or (b) a substantial risk breach of a mass requirement, Level 2 penalty; or (c) a severe risk breach of a mass requirement, Level 3 penalty; or (d) a minor risk breach of a dimension or load restraint requirement, Level 4 penalty; or (e) a substantial risk breach of a dimension or load restraint requirement, Level 5 penalty; or (f) a severe risk breach of a dimension or load restraint requirement, Level 6 penalty. (2) Subject to subsection (3) , an offence against this section is an offence of absolute liability. (3) The person charged has the benefit of the reasonable steps defence for an offence under this section. 74Liability of operator (1) A person commits an offence if – (a) a breach of a mass, dimension or load restraint requirement occurs; and (b) the person is the operator of the vehicle or combination concerned. Penalty: In the case of –
(a) a minor risk breach of a mass requirement, Level 1 penalty; or (b) a substantial risk breach of a mass requirement, Level 2 penalty; or (c) a severe risk breach of a mass requirement, Level 3 penalty; or (d) a minor risk breach of a dimension or load restraint requirement, Level 4 penalty; or (e) a substantial risk breach of a dimension or load restraint requirement, Level 5 penalty; or (f) a severe risk breach of a dimension or load restraint requirement, Level 6 penalty. (2) Subject to subsections (3) and (4) , an offence against this section is an offence of absolute liability. (3) If the breach concerned is a minor risk breach, the person charged has the benefit of the reasonable steps defence for an offence under this section. (4) If the breach concerned is a substantial risk breach or a severe risk breach, the person charged has the benefit of the reasonable steps defence for an offence under this section, but only so far as it relates to reliance on the weight stated in a container weight declaration. 75Liability of driver (1) A person commits an offence if – (a) a breach of a mass, dimension or load restraint requirement occurs; and (b) the person is the driver of the vehicle or combination concerned. Penalty: In the case of –
(a) a minor risk breach of a mass requirement, Level 1 penalty; or (b) a substantial risk breach of a mass requirement, Level 2 penalty; or (c) a severe risk breach of a mass requirement, Level 3 penalty; or (d) a minor risk breach of a dimension or load restraint requirement, Level 4 penalty; or (e) a substantial risk breach of a dimension or load restraint requirement, Level 5 penalty; or (f) a severe risk breach of a dimension or load restraint requirement, Level 6 penalty. (2) Subject to subsections (3) and (4) , an offence against this section is an offence of absolute liability. (3) If the breach concerned is a minor risk breach, the person charged has the benefit of the reasonable steps defence for an offence under this section. (4) If the breach concerned is a substantial risk breach or a severe risk breach, the person charged has the benefit of the reasonable steps defence for an offence under this section, but only so far as it relates to reliance on the weight stated in a container weight declaration. 76Liability of consignee (1) A person who is a consignee of goods consigned for road transport commits an offence if – (a) the person engages in conduct; and (b) that conduct results or is likely to result in inducing or rewarding a breach of a relevant mass, dimension or load restraint requirement; and (c) the person intends that result. Penalty: In the case of –
(a) an individual – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 50 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine not less than 20 penalty units and not exceeding 100 penalty units; or (b) a body corporate – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 250 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine not less than 20 penalty units and not exceeding 500 penalty units. Note Section 87 (Liability of consignee – knowledge of matters relating to container weight declaration) provides that a consignee is taken to have intended the result referred to in subsection (1) if the consignee knew or ought reasonably to have known that a container weight declaration was not provided as required or that a container weight declaration contained false or misleading information about the weight of a freight container. (2) A person who is a consignee of goods consigned for road transport commits an offence if – (a) the person engages in conduct; and (b) that conduct results or is likely to result in inducing or rewarding a breach of a relevant mass, dimension or load restraint requirement; and (c) the person is reckless as to the matter referred to in paragraph (b) . Penalty: In the case of –
(a) an individual – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 50 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine not less than 20 penalty units and not exceeding 100 penalty units; or (b) a body corporate – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 250 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine not less than 20 penalty units and not exceeding 500 penalty units. (3) A person who is a consignee of goods consigned for road transport commits an offence if – (a) the person engages in conduct; and (b) that conduct results or is likely to result in inducing or rewarding a breach of a relevant mass, dimension or load restraint requirement; and (c) the person is negligent as to the matter referred to in paragraph (b) . Penalty: In the case of –
(a) an individual – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 50 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine not less than 20 penalty units and not exceeding 100 penalty units; or (b) a body corporate – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 250 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine not less than 20 penalty units and not exceeding 500 penalty units. 77Penalty levels (1) For the purposes of this Division, a reference in a penalty provision to a level is a reference to the level of the penalty as described in this section. (2) Level 1 means, in the case of – (a) an individual – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 10 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine not less than 3 penalty units and not exceeding 20 penalty units; or (b) a body corporate – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 50 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine not less than 4 penalty units and not exceeding 100 penalty units. (3) Level 2 means, in the case of – (a) an individual – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 20 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine not less than 6 penalty units and not exceeding 40 penalty units; or (b) a body corporate – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 100 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine not less than 6 penalty units and not exceeding 200 penalty units. (4) Level 3 means, in the case of – (a) an individual for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 50 penalty units plus a maximum of 5 penalty units for each additional 1% over 120% overload; or (b) an individual for a subsequent offence – (i) a fine not less than 20 penalty units plus a maximum of 2 penalty units for each additional 1% over 120% overload; and (ii) a fine not exceeding 100 penalty units plus a maximum of 10 penalty units for each additional 1% over 120% overload; or (c) a body corporate for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 250 penalty units plus a maximum of 25 penalty units for each additional 1% over 120% overload; or (d) a body corporate for a subsequent offence – (i) a fine not less than 20 penalty units plus a maximum of 2 penalty units for each additional 1% over 120% overload; and (ii) a fine not exceeding 500 penalty units plus a maximum of 50 penalty units for each additional 1% over 120% overload. (5) Level 4 means, in the case of – (a) an individual – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 7.5 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine of not less than 2.5 penalty units and not exceeding 15 penalty units; or (b) a body corporate – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 37.5 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine of not less than 2.5 penalty units and not exceeding 75 penalty units. (6) Level 5 means, in the case of – (a) an individual – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 15 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine not less than 5 penalty units and not exceeding 30 penalty units; or (b) a body corporate – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 75 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine of not less than 5 penalty units and not exceeding 150 penalty units. (7) Level 6 means, in the case of – (a) an individual – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 50 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine of not less than 20 penalty units and not exceeding 100 penalty units; or (b) a body corporate – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 250 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine of not less than 20 penalty units and not exceeding 500 penalty units. Division 6Sanctions78Matters to be taken into consideration by courts (1) The purpose of this section is to bring to the attention of courts the general implications and consequences of breaches of mass, dimension or load restraint requirements when determining the kinds and levels of sanctions to be imposed. (2) In determining the sanctions (including the level of fine) that are to be imposed in respect of breaches of mass, dimension or load restraint requirements, courts are to take into consideration the following matters: (a) minor risk breaches involve either or both of the following: (i) an appreciable risk of accelerated road wear; (ii) an appreciable risk of unfair commercial advantage; (b) substantial risk breaches involve one or more of the following: (i) a substantial risk of accelerated road wear; (ii) an appreciable risk of damage to road infrastructure; (iii) an appreciable risk of increased traffic congestion; (iv) an appreciable risk of diminished public amenity; (v) a substantial risk of unfair commercial advantage; (c) severe risk breaches involve one or more of the following: (i) an appreciable risk of harm to public safety or the environment; (ii) a serious risk of accelerated road wear; (iii) a serious risk of harm to road infrastructure; (iv) a serious risk of increased traffic congestion; (v) a serious risk of diminished public amenity; (vi) a serious risk of unfair commercial advantage. (3) Nothing in this section affects any other matters that may or must be taken into consideration by a court. (4) Nothing in this section authorises or requires a court to assign the breach to a different category of breach. (5) Nothing in this section requires evidence to be adduced in relation to the matters that are to be taken into consideration by a court pursuant to this section. 79Default categorisation (1) If a court is satisfied that there has been a breach of a mass, dimension or load restraint requirement but is not satisfied that the breach is a substantial risk breach or a severe risk breach, it may treat the breach as a minor risk breach. (2) If a court is satisfied that there has been a breach of a mass, dimension or load restraint requirement and that the breach is at least a substantial risk breach but is not satisfied that the breach is a severe risk breach, it may treat the breach as a substantial risk breach. Division 7Container weight declarations80Application of DivisionThis Division applies to a freight container that is consigned for transport by road, either for the whole of its journey or for part of its journey. 81DefinitionFor the purposes of this Division – responsible entity, in relation to a freight container, means – (a) the person who consigned the container for transport by road in this jurisdiction if the person was in Australia at the time of consignment; or (b) if there is no person as described in paragraph (a) , the person who in Australia, on behalf of the consignor, arranged for the transport by road of the container in this jurisdiction; or (c) if there is no person as described in paragraph (a) or (b) , the person who in Australia physically offered the container for transport by road in this jurisdiction. 82Container weight declarations (1) A container weight declaration for a freight container is a declaration that states or purports to state the weight of the freight container and its contents. (2) A container weight declaration – (a) may be comprised in one or more documents or other formats, including in electronic form; or (b) may be as prescribed; or (c) without limiting the above, may be comprised wholly or partly in a placard attached or affixed to the freight container. 83Complying container weight declarations (1) A container weight declaration for a freight container complies with this Division (known as a "complying container weight declaration") if it contains the following additional information: (a) the number and other particulars of the freight container necessary to identify the container; (b) the name, home address or business address in Australia of the responsible entity; (c) the date of the declaration; (d) any other information required by the regulations. (2) However, a container weight declaration does not comply with this Division if – (a) the contents of the container weight declaration are not readily available to an officer who seeks to ascertain its contents, there and then in the presence of the freight container (whether by examining documents located in or on the vehicle or combination or by obtaining the information by radio or mobile telephone or by any other means); or (b) it is not in a form that can be used or adapted for evidentiary purposes; or (c) it is not in a form that satisfies requirements prescribed by the regulations. 84Duty of responsible entity (1) This section applies where a responsible entity offers a freight container to an operator for transport in this jurisdiction by a vehicle or combination. (2) The responsible entity must ensure that the operator or driver of the vehicle or combination is provided, before the start of the transport of the freight container in this jurisdiction, with a complying container weight declaration relating to the freight container. (3) The responsible entity is guilty of an offence if the responsible entity engages in conduct that contravenes subsection (2) .Penalty: In the case of –
(a) an individual, a fine not exceeding 40 penalty units; or (b) a body corporate, a fine not exceeding 200 penalty units. (4) Subject to subsection (5) , an offence against this section is an offence of absolute liability. (5) The person charged with an offence under this section has the benefit of the reasonable steps defence. 85Duty of operator (1) This section applies where an operator arranges for a freight container to be transported in this jurisdiction by a vehicle or combination. (2) The operator must ensure that the driver of the vehicle or combination is provided, before the start of the driver’s journey in the course of the transport of the freight container in this jurisdiction, with a complying container weight declaration relating to the freight container. (3) If the freight container is to be transported by another road or rail carrier, the operator must ensure that the other carrier is provided with a complying container weight declaration relating to the freight container (or with the prescribed particulars contained in the declaration) by the time the other carrier receives the freight container. (4) If the driver does not have a complying container weight declaration (or the prescribed particulars contained in the declaration), the operator is taken to have contravened subsection (2) unless the operator establishes that the driver was provided with the declaration (or the prescribed particulars). (5) The operator is guilty of an offence if the operator engages in conduct that contravenes subsection (2) or (3) .Penalty: In the case of –
(a) an individual, a fine not exceeding 60 penalty units; or (b) a body corporate, a fine not exceeding 300 penalty units. (6) Subject to subsection (7) , an offence against this section is an offence of absolute liability. (7) The person charged with an offence under this section has the benefit of the reasonable steps defence. (8) Any or all of subsections (2) , (3) and (4) do not apply in circumstances prescribed by the regulations. 86Duty of driver (1) A person must not drive a vehicle or combination loaded with a freight container on a public street in this jurisdiction without first having been provided with the relevant container weight declaration. (2) If a container weight declaration relating to a freight container is provided to a driver of a vehicle or combination with the container, the driver must, during the course of a journey in this jurisdiction, keep the declaration in or about the vehicle or combination or in a manner that enables it to be readily accessed from the vehicle or combination. (3) The driver is guilty of an offence if the driver engages in conduct that contravenes subsection (1) or (2) .Penalty: Fine not exceeding 60 penalty units.
(4) Subject to subsection (5) , an offence against this section is an offence of absolute liability. (5) The person charged with an offence under this section has the benefit of the reasonable steps defence. 87Liability of consignee – knowledge of matters relating to container weight declarationWithout limiting section 76 (Liability of consignee), a consignee of goods is taken to have intended the result referred to in section 76(1)(b) if – (a) the conduct concerned related to a freight container; and (b) the person knew or ought reasonably to have known that – (i) a container weight declaration for the container was not provided as required by this Act; or (ii) a container weight declaration provided for the container contained information about the weight of the container and its contents that was false or misleading in a material particular. Note Section 76(1) provides that a person who is a consignee of goods consigned for road transport is guilty of an offence if the person engages in conduct that results or is likely to result in inducing or rewarding a breach of a relevant mass, dimension or load restraint requirement and the person intends that result. Division 8Recovery of losses resulting from non-provision of or inaccurate container weight declarations88Recovery of losses for non-provision of container weight declaration (1) This section applies where – (a) a container weight declaration has not been provided as required; and (b) a person suffered loss as a result of the non-provision of the declaration. (2) Any person (the "plaintiff") has a right to recover under this Act, from the responsible entity for a freight container, the monetary value of any loss incurred by the plaintiff and consequent on the non-provision of the container weight declaration relating to that freight container. (3) Losses that may be recovered include any or all of the following: (a) any loss incurred from delays in the delivery of the freight container or any goods contained in it or of other goods; (b) any loss incurred from the spoilingof or damage to the goods; (c) any loss incurred from the need to provide another vehicle or combination, and any loss incurred from any delay in the provision of another vehicle or combination; (d) any costs or expenses incurred in weighing the freight container or any of its contents or both. (4) The plaintiff may enforce that right by bringing proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction for an order for payment of the monetary value of the loss. 89Recovery of losses for provision of inaccurate container weight declaration (1) This section applies where – (a) a container weight declaration has been provided as required; and (b) the declaration contains information about a freight container – (i) that is false or misleading in a material particular by understating the weight of the container; or (ii) that is otherwise false or misleading in a material particular by indicating that the weight of the container is lower than its actual weight; and (c) a breach of a mass requirement occurred as a result of the reliance, by an operator or driver of a vehicle or combination, on the information in the declaration when transporting the container by road (whether or not enforcement action has been or may be taken in relation to the breach); and (d) the operator or driver of the vehicle or combination – (i) had at the time a reasonable belief that the vehicle or combination concerned was not in breach of a mass requirement; and (ii) did not know, and could not reasonably have known, at the time that the minimum weight stated in the declaration was lower than the actual weight of the container; and (e) a person suffered loss as a result of the provision of the declaration. (2) Any person (the "plaintiff") has a right to recover under this Act, from the responsible entity for the freight container, the monetary value of any loss incurred by the plaintiff and consequent on the provision of the container weight declaration. (3) Losses that may be recovered include any or all of the following: (a) any fine, infringement penalty or other penalty imposed on the plaintiff under an Australian road law; (b) any fine, infringement penalty or other penalty imposed on an agent or employee of the plaintiff under an Australian road law and reimbursed by the plaintiff; (c) any loss incurred from delays in the delivery of the freight container or any goods contained in it or of other goods; (d) any loss incurred from the spoiling of or damage to the goods; (e) any loss incurred from the need to provide another vehicle or combination, and any loss incurred from any delay in the provision of another vehicle or combination; (f) any costs or expenses incurred in weighing the freight container or any of its contents or both. (4) The plaintiff may enforce that right by bringing proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction for an order for payment of the monetary value of the loss. 90Recovery of amount by responsible entity (1) This section applies where an order under section 89 (Recovery of losses for provision of inaccurate container weight declaration) has been made or is being sought against a responsible entity for payment of the monetary value of any loss incurred by a person. (2) The responsible entity has a right to recover under this Act, from a person (the "information provider") who provided the responsible entity with all or any of the information that was false or misleading, so much (the "attributable amount") of the monetary value paid or payable by the responsible entity under the order as is attributable to that information. (3) The responsible entity may enforce that right by – (a) joining or seeking the joinder of the information provider in the proceedings for the order under section 89 and applying to the court for an order for payment of the attributable amount to be made when the order is made under that section; or (b) bringing separate proceedings in a court of competent jurisdiction for an order for payment of the attributable amount. 91Assessment of monetary value or attributable amount (1) In making an order under this Division, a court may assess – (a) the monetary value of any loss, as referred to in – (i) section 88 (Recovery of losses for non-provision of container weight declaration); or (ii) section 89 (Recovery of losses for provision of inaccurate container weight declaration); or (b) the attributable amount, as referred to in section 90 (Recovery of amount by responsible entity) – in such manner as the court considers appropriate. (2) In making such an assessment, the court may take into account such matters as it considers relevant, including any evidence adduced in connection with any prosecution brought for a breach referred to in section 89 . 92Costs (1) A court may award costs in relation to the proceedings for an order under this Division. (2) A court may, in proceedings for an order under this Division, order payment of any costs or expenses incurred in weighing a freight container or any of its contents, or both, where – (a) the minimum weight stated in the container weight declaration concerned was lower than the actual weight; or (b) a container weight declaration was not provided. (3) An order under subsection (2) may be made in favour of a party to the proceedings, an Australian Authority or a public authority of this or any other jurisdiction. Division 9Transport documentation93False or misleading transport documentation: liability of consignor, packer, loader, receiver and others (1) This section applies where – (a) goods are consigned for transport by road, or for transport partly by road and partly by some other means; and (b) all or any part of the transport by road occurs or is to occur in this jurisdiction. (2) A person is guilty of an offence if – (a) the transport documentation relating to the consignment is false or misleading in a material particular relating to the mass, dimension or load restraint of any or all of the goods consigned; and (b) the person is the consignor of the goods. Penalty: In the case of –
(a) an individual – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 50 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine not less than 20 penalty units and not exceeding 100 penalty units; or (b) a body corporate – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 250 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine not less than 20 penalty units and not exceeding 500 penalty units. (3) A person is guilty of an offence if – (a) the goods are packed in Australia in a freight container or other container or in a package or on a pallet for transport by road; and (b) the transport documentation relating to the consignment is false or misleading in a material particular relating to the mass, dimension or load restraint of any or all of the goods consigned; and (c) the person is the packer of the goods. Penalty: In the case of –
(a) an individual – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 50 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine not less than 20 penalty units and not exceeding 100 penalty units; or (b) a body corporate – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 250 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine not less than 20 penalty units and not exceeding 500 penalty units. (4) A person is guilty of an offence if – (a) the goods are loaded on a vehicle or combination for transport by road; and (b) the transport documentation relating to the consignment is false or misleading in a material particular relating to the mass, dimension or load restraint of any or all of the goods consigned; and (c) the person is the loader of the goods. Penalty: In the case of –
(a) an individual – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 50 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine not less than 20 penalty units and not exceeding 100 penalty units; or (b) a body corporate – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 250 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine not less than 20 penalty units and not exceeding 500 penalty units. (5) A person is guilty of an offence if – (a) the goods are packed outside Australia in a freight container or other container or in a package or on a pallet for transport by road; and (b) the transport documentation relating to the consignment is false or misleading in a material particular relating to the mass, dimension or load restraint of any or all of the goods consigned; and (c) the person is the receiver of the goods in Australia. Penalty: In the case of –
(a) an individual – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 50 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine not less than 20 penalty units and not exceeding 1 000 penalty units; or (b) a body corporate – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 250 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine not less than 20 penalty units and not exceeding 500 penalty units. (6) A person is guilty of an offence if – (a) a container weight declaration provided to an operator of a vehicle or combination contains information that is false or misleading in a material particular; and (b) the person is the responsible entity who offered the freight container concerned to the operator for transport. Penalty: In the case of –
(a) an individual – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 50 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine not less than 20 penalty units and not exceeding 100 penalty units; or (b) a body corporate – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 250 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine not less than 20 penalty units and not exceeding 500 penalty units. (7) A person is guilty of an offence if – (a) a container weight declaration provided to a driver of a vehicle or combination contains information that is false or misleading in a material particular; and (b) the person is the operator of the vehicle or combination who arranged for the freight container concerned to be transported in this jurisdiction. Penalty: In the case of –
(a) an individual – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 50 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine not less than 20 penalty units and not exceeding 100 penalty units; or (b) a body corporate – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 250 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine not less than 20 penalty units and not exceeding 500 penalty units. (8) Information in a container weight declaration is not false or misleading for the purposes of this Act merely because it overstates the actual weight of the freight container and its contents. (9) Subject to subsection (10) , an offence against this section is an offence of absolute liability. (10) A person charged with an offence under this section has the benefit of the reasonable steps defence. Note Section 70 (Reasonable steps defence – reliance on container weight declaration) makes provision for reliance on a container weight declaration where an operator or driver is charged with an offence involving a breach of a mass requirement and is seeking to rely on the reasonable steps defence. (11) In this section – receiver of goods in Australia means – (a) the person who first receives them in Australia, otherwise than the person who merely unloads them; or (b) the person who unpacks the goods after they are first unloaded in Australia – but does not include a class of persons declared by the regulations to be excluded from this definition. Division 10Concessions94DefinitionsIn this Division – condition of a mass, dimension or load restraint concession means a term or condition specified in or otherwise applicable to the concession, being – (a) a term or condition that imposes a different requirement in place of a requirement contained in the provision of a road law from which the holder of the concession is exempted; or (b) any other term or condition subject to which the concession has effect; mass, dimension or load restraint concession means a permit, authorisation, approval, exemption, notice or anything else that is granted or issued in writing under a road law and that exempts a person from a provision of a road law in relation to a mass, dimension or load restraint requirement. 95Offence of contravening conditionA person is guilty of an offence if – (a) the person holds a mass, dimension or load restraint concession; and (b) the person engages in conduct that results in the contravention of a condition of that mass, dimension or load restraint concession. Penalty: In the case of –
(a) an individual – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 30 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine not less than 12 penalty units and not exceeding 60 penalty units; or (b) a body corporate – (i) for a first offence, a fine not exceeding 150 penalty units; or (ii) for a subsequent offence, a fine not less than 12 penalty units and not exceeding 300 penalty units. 96Effect of contravening condition – prosecutions or other action (1) If a person engages in conduct that contravenes a condition of a mass, dimension or load restraint concession – (a) the concession does not, while the contravention continues, operate in the person’s favour; and (b) accordingly, the concession is to be disregarded in determining whether there has been a breach of a mass, dimension or load restraint requirement and in determining the risk category to which the breach belongs. (2) Where, by virtue of subsection (1) , a person is guilty of an offence against the provision of a road law from which the person was exempted by the concession concerned, the person may be proceeded against either for that offence or for the offence under section 95 (Offence of contravening condition) of engaging in conduct that contravenes a condition of the concession. 97Operation of DivisionThis Division has effect subject to the provisions of the road law under which the mass, dimension or load restraint concession concerned was granted or issued and to the terms of the concession itself. PART 5General Administrative Sanctions Note In addition to the sanctions under this Part, an infringement notice may be issued for an offence under this Act if that offence is a prescribed offence under Part IVB of the Traffic Act 1925 . Division 1Improvement notices98DefinitionIn this Division – approved officer means – (a) an authorised officer, or an authorised officer of a class, for the time being nominated by the Authority as an approved officer or class of approved officers for the purposes of this Division; or (b) a police officer, or a police officer of a class, for the time being nominated by the Commissioner of Police (or by a police officer authorised by the Commissioner to make nominations for the purposes of this section) as an approved officer or class of approved officers for the purposes of this Division. 99Improvement notices (1) This section applies where an approved officer is of the opinion that any person has contravened, is contravening or is likely to contravene any provision of an Australian road law. (2) The approved officer may serve on the person an improvement notice requiring the person to remedy the contravention or likely contravention, or the matters or activities occasioning the contravention or likely contravention, within the period specified in the notice. (3) The period within which the person is required by the improvement notice to comply with the notice must be at least 7 days after service of the notice. (4) However, the approved officer may specify a shorter period if satisfied that it is reasonably practicable for the person to comply with the notice by the end of the shorter period. (5) The improvement notice must – (a) state that the approved officer is of the opinion referred to in subsection (1) ; and (b) state the reasons for that opinion; and (c) specify the provisions of the Australian road laws in respect of which that opinion is held; and (d) include information about obtaining a review of the notice; and (e) state that it is issued under this section. (6) The improvement notice may but need not specify the method by which the alleged contravention or likely contravention, or the matters or activities occasioning the alleged contravention or likely contravention, are to be remedied. 100Contravention of improvement notice (1) A person commits an offence if – (a) the person is subject to an improvement notice; and (b) the person engages in conduct that results in a contravention of a requirement of the improvement notice. Penalty: In the case of –
(a) an individual, a fine not exceeding 100 penalty units; or (b) a body corporate, a fine not exceeding 500 penalty units. (2) It is a defence in proceedings for an offence under subsection (1) if the defendant establishes that he or she has a reasonable excuse. (3) It is a defence in proceedings for an offence under subsection (1) if the defendant establishes that – (a) the alleged contravention or likely contravention; or (b) the matters or activities occasioning the alleged contravention or likely contravention – were remedied within the period specified in the notice, though by a method different from that specified in the improvement notice. (4) Subject to subsections (2) and (3) , an offence against subsection (1) is an offence of strict liability. 101Amendment of improvement notices (1) An improvement notice served by an approved officer who is an authorised officer may be amended by any approved officer who is an authorised officer. (2) An improvement notice served by an approved officer who is a police officer may be amended by any approved officer who is a police officer. (3) An amendment of an improvement notice is effected by service on the person affected of a notice stating the terms of the amendment. (4) An amendment of an improvement notice is ineffective if it purports to deal with a contravention of a different provision of an Australian road law from that dealt with in the improvement notice as first served. (5) A notice of an amendment of an improvement notice must – (a) state the reasons for the amendment; and (b) include information about obtaining a review of the notice; and (c) state that it is issued under this section. 102Cancellation of improvement notices (1) An improvement notice served by an approved officer who is an authorised officer may be cancelled by – (a) the Authority; or (b) an approved officer who is an authorised officer and who is senior in rank to the approved officer who served the notice. (2) An improvement notice served by an approved officer who is a police officer may be cancelled by – (a) the Commissioner of Police; or (b) an approved officer who is a police officer and who is senior in rank to the approved officer who served the notice. (3) Notice of cancellation of an improvement notice is required to be served on the person affected. (4) The regulations may make provision for or with respect to identifying or determining the seniority in rank of approved officers for the purposes of this section. 103Clearance certificates (1) An approved officer may issue a clearance certificate to the effect that all or any specified requirements of an improvement notice have been complied with. (2) A requirement of an improvement notice ceases to be operative on receipt, by the person on whom the notice was served, of a clearance certificate to the effect that –